The Southern Pacific Railroad (SPRR) was a company with many far-flung field offices. Rather than relying on the Bell System to provide communication between offices, they ran their own communications cabling along their right-of-way (trackside)creating their own internal nationwide communications network. Recently however, they have explored sending information via emails. This required them to read through the emails of their employees even if these were official sites. Email or the transferring of messages electronically via computer networks proves to be very effective in the exchange of communication. Using email is like composing or reading a paper message, with several distinct differences: It’s faster.
Email is received almost immediately after it is sent, usually within minutes. It’s more conversational. Because of its immediacy, a whole series of e-mail messages may be exchanged within a very short time. As a result, email messages tend to be less formal and they are also usually shorter and more to the point. It’s easier to reference. The text of a previous email message can easily be included as part of a reply to that message. Thus, email correspondents are able to keep the replies in context for each message.
Including this context is not only polite, but also makes an email message more accurate and understandable. The email has truly bridged the gap between people in great distances. This progress proves beneficial to every individual especially to those whose schedules are hectic. Although the power of emailing offers peoples easy way to communication, it thus posits a horrendous reality: individuals who have special knowledge on computer technology may gain access to anyones emails. This alarming veracity may actually put someone in grave danger. Although many probably think that this kind of event only takes place in a large scope, thus, affecting only significant figures, reality speaks that this could also transpire in the very place where we are so familiar with. Yes! In our very own workplace! Whether employees like it or not, they found out that management sneaks in to an employees computer especially if there is an urgent communication that needed to be opened in an inbox.
The Term Paper on Communication People Employees Management
"Communication is not only the essence of being human, but also a vital property of life. ." Language was the first success he had for expressing his feelings and thoughts to others. Today, we are fighting the same struggle, but for the betterment of communication. The research topic these days is the media of communication. We have advanced to the level where communication between two distant ...
Whether it is official or just plain prurient curiosity, the issue of morality is thus hoisted. Employers can still pry open into personal mail of their employees. And the employees of SPRR are already reacting to this. Based on these accounts, one may considerably argue that checking on someones email in the absence of consent is deemed morally incorrect. Despite possible contention of employee-employer relationship, having the latter the ultimate right to direct and control an individual in the way he/she works both as to final results and as to the details of when, where, and how the work is to be performed.This clearly elucidates how the relationship should exist between the concerned individuals. That does not mention anything in specific regarding the monitoring of emails. Such uninvited act of monitoring emails, or anything personal, is not conventionally and socially acceptable. Although it is very hard to contest, when guided by the premise employer/employee relationship in analogy to the familial relationship, there is no rule however that the former may literally ransack the belongings of the latter, which in this case, refers to the email. If such actuation prevails in a workplace, the supposed ideal relationship between the employer/employee can be tarnished even if there is a tacit consent with most of the employees.
The former will never grow tired spying on his domain, while the latter, will refuse to disclose even significant data or information that might be beneficial to the company or agency. An air of disrespect will without doubt waft the air. An unwanted employer/employee relationship will crop up. The act of monitoring an email will show demeaning attributes of an employer resulting in future ill-effects. This would mean failure to build a strong pool of employees, discontinuity of good work, disruption of harmonious relationship among employees, quarrelsome and suspicious attitudes, absenteeism, malingering, poor performance and late attendance. Thus, the query if it is morally acceptable for employers to monitor email deviates from the conformity instilled by the culture and tradition that have existed for a long time.
The Term Paper on National Labor Relations Act Employees Employer
1. INTRO. (Page 360) Employment laws have been implemented to protect both employers and employees. Statutes that govern the relationship between the employer and the employee have been around for a long time. The early statutes, especially in England and the U. S. , were to control and restrict workers. The earliest statutes on wages were implemented to set maximum wages. Other statutes ...
Also, the act surely and clearly defies the laws of man that invading ones privacy is illegal and unacceptable. One, the employer for this matter, should learn how to value the importance of respect in so order for peaceful coexistence to prevail. Thus, in cases like these, prurient curiosity must be completely purged from impurities. REFERENCES Brandeis, Loius D. and Samuel Warren. The Right to Privacy. University of Loiuseville.
National Geographic: Show Real Asia. Accessed 22 April 2006 at: http://www.kantun.com/styleguide/book/advant.html Morality. Wikipedia. Accessed 22 April 2006 at: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality.
