Neusner has presented support for his thesis with both logical and emotional elements, and the emotional elements help to persuade. Some of the author’s stronger arguments include, even thought students come to class late, are lazy, and are rude, the faculty stay calm and helps students to solve problems. For example, if students came late the faculty pretends like they do not care. Despite instructors failing to teach the students, the students are happy because, for them school is easy. Some students may argue or act rude toward the faculty, but the real world, after they are graduates, is not same as college.
That will make students failures in the real world, because students will act with coworkers and bosses same ways they acted with faculty or professors. In colleges, students drop classes without failure, but outside of college failure will become marked on their record. After graduating with good grades maybe benefit in the future, but in the real world, good grades do not protect students from doing wrong. College has spoiled students and has not prepared students for the real world that is why on graduation day is not the day that faculty should be proud.
In contrast, the author has been less effective using proof/logic in other examples. For instance, it is not always true that he said students’ failure leaves with no record, and if a student forgets their appointment, the faculty will change their schedule. The author might be correct that sometimes college spoils students and makes students too comfortable, as it is logical to see examples of that in other parts of life. Brown University is trying to make being a student easy, for reasons of professors want students to be happy, and like the faculty.
Public Schools Preparing Students for the Real World
Nation article, that even with a high school diploma, students find themselves unprepared for college’s academic challenges. He states that it is a tough lesson to learn the hard way “through experience” for many students now arriving on campus. To support his suggestion he includes a study that one in three students entering college have to enroll in remedial courses in order to continue with ...
And it is true this will make students fail in the real world, but it still happens in many colleges. The faculty knows it was not right, but they still did, because being a strict professor will make students chose to learn with another professor that is easier. And when students have easy professors, it is hard to improve and it will make college a retreat. And this is why the faculty does not feel pride on commencement day. In my opinion, I think students will like easy professors and they will feel unappreciated with easy professor when they are in the real world that acts different from college.
After I finished reading the article, I felt like the author was upset with the faculty system and is clearly emotional about this subject. This speech may affect students, but in my opinion this article should affect the professors more. This situation will not happen if college systems are stricter. It is true that students like easy professors, but if they have no choice because every professors are strict, they will prepare themselves more before coming to the class. This article feels like the author thinks this problem cannot be solved and that is why he is sarcastic with this tone.
One thing students want is a good grade, because that shows they are responsible and that will make them be the first choice for employment. I have an example that is related to this article. My classmate is an A student all the time, and one day the strict professor said grades were not important. The important thing is that we can bring the knowledge to adapt in the work situation. After the class, my classmate told me it was not true, because if she does not have good grades it is hard to find a job. After the end of semester, she told me she got A- from that class, and she does not like this professor.
The Term Paper on Online Communities Students Community College
... We say that students and professors are more willing to take risks in college online communities that ... interconnected telecommunication network that we use to make telephone calls in shariah and Dubai can ... the monitor screen, we don't interact with real people. Here goes the role of ... resource for students. It is easier to provide communication infrastructure for creating groups of students talking ...
Another class she got A, and she told me the professor was easy, however the teacher did not teach well, which made her have to study by herself. From my classmate example, I realized that being a good professor by being strict can make the students think the professor is bad, but being a lazy professor that gives good grades makes the students think the professor is good. The author makes a passionate argument by logically suggesting if colleges want to solve this problem, the leaders need to write the rules that make every professor go in the same direction. Unfortunately, Neusner offers no real solution plan for accomplishing this.
For instance, no professor wants to be the problem; if all professors do the same thing, no one makes a difference. But, this is problem applies equally to being “too easy” and being “too strict”. That will help their faculty or college get stronger. Schools need to teach students to be respectful to professors and their institutions, if this succeeds, students will be successful in college and in the real world. In conclusion, I believe the author makes a good argument when supporting his thesis. Then students will fail in the real world, because colleges do not prepare them to handle with real live.
