.” … how can I deny the truth?” Although Bertrande is well-intentioned, her actions bring misery to everyone. Discuss. The notion of Bertrande de Rols in The Wife of Martin Guerre as having good intentions suggests not only that she was mindful of her own feelings in her pursuit of the truth, but also of the feelings of others. However, Bertrande’s intentions were to cleanse her soul and absolve herself from sin by indicting the impostor, Arnaud du Tilh. Yet, she undertakes this task considering the despair it would inflict upon the meanie.
These actions also are detrimental to Bertrande in causing her perhaps the most anguish and grief of all. Bertrande intends to uphold the status quo, yet she has due knowledge that pathway to the greater good will be harmful to her and the Mesnie. Bertrande’s intentions are to free her soul from the binds of the sin she committed by being the wife of Arnaud du Tilh. Bertrande’s loyalty to Martin shapes her response to being ‘imposed upon, deceived, betrayed into adultery’ and as she came to the inescapable conclusion that Arnaud was indeed an impostor, her first thoughts were to ‘rid herself of him’ and dissolve her guilt. As the epiphany occurs, the ‘spindle’ drops to the floor, unravelling the truth ‘finally, coldly, inescapably.’ This is immediately followed by the repetition of ‘I’ in Bertrande’s inner thoughts, Lewis using this pronoun to suggest the action Bertrande would take part in to condemn Arnaud du Tilh would be primarily based on her own personal escape from his treachery.
The Essay on Natalie Davis Martin Bertrande Arnaud
It seems as though in today's society, suspicion lies in every corner. No one trusts anyone anymore, everyone lies, everyone steals, everyone pretends to be someone they are not. However true or false these statements might be, there is a need in today's society to be able to explain everything, coming up with every possible lie or predicament within every story. Natalie Davis is from today's ...
Bertrande’s intentions are fundamentally to promote self preservation and to put her mind at ease. Nevertheless, Bertrande knows these self-centred intentions, when put into action, will ultimately be reflected by the displeasure and distress of her children and the Mesnie. ‘I am destroying the happiness of my family. And why? … to free myself from the deceit which was consuming and killing me.’ Bertrande’s strong desire to free herself from the cunning of Arnaud du Tilh inevitably brought considerations of the Mesnie and her children to mind. ‘Her affection for her kindred rose about her in a wall implacable as stone’ as she was ‘condemned to solitude’ knowing the hurt her accusations against Arnaud inflicted upon the meanie.
Furthermore, the drawn out process of the trial brought ‘heart-breaking uncertainty,’ with Lewis clearly indicating through this use of language Bertrande’s awareness of the affect of her actions upon others. The joy brought to the meanie by Arnaud, was knowingly dissembled by Bertrande to purge his perpetual deception. Because of this resentment shown towards Bertrande by the meanie, her actions indirectly bring about her own suffering. The very cohesive system which she innately supports does not return that support when their blind happiness is jeopardized. Bertrande is thereby thrust into isolation and can no longer take joy in anything as her structured world crumbles around her. The immediate aftermath of the Rieu x decision blatantly demonstrates the extent of Bertrande’s agony.
She returned to what was once a household with a foundation of ‘peace and contentment’ to a household which blames her, by ‘word and gesture’ for the evident ‘destruction’ her actions had caused. This rift is perhaps most overtly shown as her beloved son, San xi, ironically sides with Arnaud, observing his mother ‘with frightened, incredulous eyes’ upon her return. Bertrande, in intending to remove this impostor from the meanie, is met by the meanie and her son “without exultation… without merriment” and instead by suspicion and resentment.
The Term Paper on Affirmative Action 27
How Affirmative Action Effects Us All The roots of affirmative action can be traced back to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act where legislation redefined public and private behavior. The act states that to discriminate in private is legal, but anything regarding business or public discrimination is illegal ("Affirmative" 13). There are two instances when opposing affirmative action might ...
This becomes the foundation in generating Bertrande’s unspeakable suffering. Essentially, Bertrande de Rols’ intending to simply free herself from Arnaud’s imposture, invariably inflicted misery upon her kindred and upon herself. Ironically, the very action she takes in intending to release herself from the unhappiness of du Tilh’s deception, brings about the greatest unhappiness in that she loses all that matters to her.
