How Passivity and Submissiveness lead to madness by Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Henrik Ibsen ” He told me all his opinions, so I had the same ones too; or if they were different I hid them, since he wouldn’t have cared for that” (Ibsen 109).
As this quote suggests Charlotte Perkins Gilman, in “The Yellow Wall-Paper” and Henrik Ibsen, in A Doll House dramatize that, for woman, silent passivity and submissiveness can lead to madness. The narrator of “The Yellow Wall-Paper” is driven to madness after she withdraws into herself. “I am alone” (Gilman 44), she tells us.
Desperately trying to express her feelings to John, she says “I told him that I really was not gaining here and that I wish he would take me away” (Gilman 46), but “I stopped short; for he sat up straight and looked at me with such a stern reproachful look that I could not say another word.” Instead the narrator “keeps quiet.” She settles into quiet submission: I “am much more quiet than I was. John is so pleased” (Gilman 48).
She is “afraid” to “irritate” John or “to make him uncomfortable” (Gilman 42).
She makes herself believe that as a “physician” he knows what’s best for her and, therefore, acts passively, letting John control her even though she gets “unreasonably angry with” him (Gilman 40).
Writing in her journal is the only thing that keeps her sane; yet John takes that away from her: “I must put this away-he hates to have me write” (Gilman 41).
The Term Paper on Dramatist Henrik Ibsen
Henrik Johan Ibsen was a modern realistic dramatist. He is though of, by many authors and playwrights as the “father of modern drama”. Ibsen was considered a great national treasure by the Norwegians. Henrik Ibsen wrote many controversial plays which dealt with gender discrimination. The plays highlighted the struggles Victorian women went through to find respect and equality. Ibsen’s work gave ...
The narrator yearns to confess to John how she really feels, but she prefers to keep her feelings bottled up: “I think sometimes that if I were to write a little it would relieve the pressure of ideas and rest me” (Gilman 42).
Instead, she is passive and hides her emotions. “I cry at nothing and cry most of the time. Of course I don’t when John is here, or anybody else,” only “when I am alone” (Gilman 44).
She tells us that “John doesn’t know how much I really suffer” (Gilman 41).
Even when the narrator tries to communicate with him, he immediately dismisses her: “I tried to have a real earnest reasonable talk with him,” but “John wouldn’t hear of it” (Gilman 40).
Instead of speaking her mind and standing up for herself, she withdraws and does “not say another word” (Gilman 47).
Convincing herself that John is always “right,” she obeys whatever “John says,” which only causes her condition to “worsen” despite the fact the her husband insists that she is “gaining”, and her condition is “better” (Gilman 46).
The narrator believes “that congenial work with excitement and change would do [her] good” (Gilman 39), but she subordinates her own feelings and adheres to John’s directions, which only “makes [her] feel badly” (Gilman 40).
She tells John that she wants to visit Henry and Julia, her cousins, but he tells her that “she wasn’t able to” (Gilman 45).
She is left feeling helpless: “what is one to do?” (Gilman 39).
By suppressing her feelings, the narrator slowly “creeps” (Gilman 52) towards insanity. The narrator’s feelings of inferiority and powerlessness parallels the female figure she sees trapped behind the pattern in the wall-paper adorning her room. She gradually withdraws from both John and reality by locking herself in the room and ultimately merging with the figure. Through the changing image of the pattern from a “fait figure” (Gilman 46) to a “woman stooping” (Gilman 46) behind the paper and “shaking the bars” (Gilman 46) as if she wanted “to get out” (Gilman 46), we can see her becoming one with the figure: “I pulled and she shook, I shook and she pulled, and before morning we had peeled off yards of that paper.” (51) Her collapse into madness as reflected in her behavior with the “bedstead [that] is fairly gnawed” (Gilman 51) and her “creeping all around” (Gilman 50) is a direct result of her passive submissiveness to John’s control of her life. In comparison to “The Yellow Wall-Paper,” Henrik Ibsen also brilliantly dramatizes the link between silent passivity and madness through the characterization of Nora Helmer, the wife of a banker who is driven to the edge of madness after trying to hide her “big secret” (Ibsen 55) from her husband Torvald.
The Term Paper on Gilmans The Yellow Wallpaper John Narrator Wife
Doctor Knows Best Often human illness calls for medical attention to acquire both soundness of body and mind. Opinions from medical professionals are sought after by those individuals seeking reassurance and peace of mind in knowing they will receive the best possible treatment. In her short story The Yellow Wallpaper, Charlotte Perkins Gilman presents a situation where a respected professional, ...
Terrified that her husband might find out that she had forged her father’s signature to secure a loan, even though it was done with the intention of saving his life, she is a prisoner to her own secret, which keeps her in silence. She must pretend that everything is normal when she is around him. As she tells her friend Kristine: “Nobody must know. Not for anything in the world” (Ibsen 53).
Nora can not let anyone find out about the crime she had committed because it will “ruin” her marriage and her “beautiful, happy home” (Ibsen 54) as well as her husbands reputation. She carries the burden of the secret with her everyday, struggling to find ways to pay the money back to Krogstad, the lawyer from whom she borrowed the money for the loan. Rather than accept her “punishment” (Ibsen 70) and tell Torvald the truth, she puts on a “mask” (Ibsen 70) and pretends that everything is “wonderful” (Ibsen 47).
She acts submissive and like a “doll-wife” (Ibsen 110) around him, playing the role of his object and pretending to be helpless and innocent. She wants Torvald to think that she “is incapable of anything serious” (Ibsen 52).
She leads him to believe that she is “a sweet little thing” who “can’t get anywhere without [his] help” (Ibsen 91) when, in reality, she is “a wife with a little business sense, a wife who knows how to manage” (Ibsen 53).
The Term Paper on Mrs Linde Nora Torvald Money
Ever since 'A Doll House' first came to the stage in the 1880's, critics have argued vehemently about the Ibsen's intentions while writing the play, and the ambivalence over the play confused not only the plays but also the audience: while some patrons praised the play, others stormed the stages in protest of Nora's abandonment of her family. The difference of opinion ranged so far as to incite ...
But weighed down by “that sort of guilt” that causes her to “lie and cheat and deceive all sides, [and]… to wear a mask even with the nearest and dearest,” (Ibsen 70) Nora wishes to be “invisible” (Ibsen 103).
She considers taking drastic measures in act II after Krogstad threatens to blackmail her, including running away and suicide. The silence that engulfs her nearly causes her, as she tells Kristine, to “go out of [her] mind” (Ibsen 89).
Nora is so “terribly frightened” (Ibsen 91) because, if Torvald finds out her secret, she believes it will “ruin” their relationship and destroy their “beautiful, happy home” (Ibsen 54).
She only desires “to please” him (Ibsen 47).
Holding everything inside, her erotic behavior as she dances the tarantella wildly leads Torvald to declare, “This is pure madness” (Ibsen 93).
Nora dances to the tarantella in a “violent” (Ibsen 91) manner as a way to secretly release the “weight” she has been carrying around trying to keep her secret hidden. Dancing in her own way, other than by Torvald’s “instruction” (Ibsen 92) the way he had taught her to previously, prepares us for her liberation. At the end of the play, Nora is able to save herself from going “insane” (Ibsen 110) when Torvald discovers the secret she has been fiercely guarding.
She is finally set “free” (Ibsen 53).
Nora has a “serious talk” (Gilman 109) with Torvald during which she tells him how he’s “wronged” her (Ibsen 109), that she no longer is in love with him, and that she must “try to educate” herself and “stand completely alone” (Ibsen 110).
She realizes that she had been raised to be a doll, first by her Papa, then by Torvald: “He used to call me his doll-child, and he played with me the way I played with my dolls… I went from Papa’s hands into yours.
You arranged everything to your own taste, and so I got the same taste as you-or I pretended to… Now when I look back it seems I have lived here like a beggar-just from hand to mouth” (Ibsen 109).
The Term Paper on Begins To Realize Nora Torvald Christine
A Doll's House: Nora Perceived by Other Characters Nancy Landis Ms. Holmes, p. 1 English 12 12 February 1995 In the Victorian age many woman were thought of as mere objects. Most woman has no real social status and were not allowed to express themselves freely. A Doll's House, a play by Henrik Ibsen, has brought controversy to the conclusion in which Nora leaves her family. Nora perceived in many ...
Rather than be “sheltered” (Ibsen 108) by him unlike Gilman’s character, Nora is able to speak up for herself and confront her past. Both Nora and the narrator of “The Yellow Wall-Paper” suffer from their silent passivity and submissiveness. Nora Helmer, who nearly “lost [her] mind” (Ibsen), is able to save herself by being assertive and speaking out, confronting Torvald, her past, and her need to educate herself in the ways of the world. Unfortunately Gilman’s character keeps her feelings inside, and, as a result withdraws into herself and becomes insane.
The narrator asserts her disjunction from reality as she tells John: “I’ve got out at last… in spite of you and Jane… and you can’t put me back” (Gilman 53), sloughing off the person she once was, “Jane” to become the “woman” in the paper.
