Theory of Knowledge First Short Paper The skepticism of the existence of God has been a heavily discussed topic since the existence of man. Many philosophers have had many writings analyzing the facts and possibilities to prove this argument. Saint Thomas Aquinas is the philosopher whom best analyzes the facts in a way for me to understand that God exists. Saint Thomas Aquinas can prove the argument of the existence of God in five ways. I have chosen to discuss the first paragraph in his thesis due to the least amount of confusion. The first paragraph contains the following from Saint Thomas Aquinas: The first and more manifest way is the argument from motion. It is certain, and evident to our senses, that in the world some things are in motion.
Now whatever is moved is moved by another, for nothing can be moved except it is potentiality to that towards which it is moved; whereas a thing moves inasmuch as it is in act. For motion is nothing else that the reduction of something from potentiality to actuality. But nothing can be reduced from potentiality to actuality, except by something in the state of actuality. Thus that which is actually hot, as fire, makes wood, which is potentially hot, to be actually hot, and thereby moves and changes it. Now it is not possible that the same thing should be at once in actuality and potentiality in the same respect, but only in different respects. For what is actually hot cannot simultaneously be potentially hot; but it is simultaneously potentially cold.
The Essay on Do The Right Thing
The movie Do the Right Thing, a group of people in the district of Brooklyn, have had enough and tensions are growing in this black ghetto area. The only local businesses are a Korean grocery and Sal's Pizzeria. Mookie, Sal's delivery boy, manages to always be at the center of the action. The movie Do the Right Thing is a movie about a neighborhood that suffers from lack of diversity. On a hot ...
It is therefore impossible that in the same respect and in the same way a thing should be both mover and moved, i.e., that it should move itself. Therefore, whatever is moved must be moved by another. If that by which it is moved be itself moved, then this also must needs be moved by another, and that by another again. But this cannot go on to infinity, because then there would be no first mover, and consequently no other mover, seeing that subsequent movers move only inasmuch as they are moved by the first mover; as the staff moves only because it is moved by the hand. Therefore it is necessary to arrive at a first mover, moved by no other; and this everyone understands to be God. In the passage, several arguments are discussed to prove that God exists. The difficulty lies in the understanding of potentiality and actuality. Keeping in mind the focus is to prove that God exists was a good aid in translating some of Aquinas writing.
Saint Thomas Aquinas starts his argument discussing whatever is moved is moved by another. The movements all start with a first mover. The first mover moved another person that was potentially going to be moved by someone (the first mover).
Aquinas talks about the movement that could happen, did happen, and how it happened in terms of potentiality and actuality. For X which is in potential form, to become Y which is the actuality of potential X, then the only way for X to have become Y is from something that was already in actuality form. This explains the mover moving things. In the example of the wood and fire, potentiality and actuality play a key role in the understanding of the existence of God.
Aquinas says for wood to go from potentially to actually hot, something must be applied to the wood. In this case, fire would cause the wood to go from potentially hot to an actual hot state. It is impossible for the wood to be simultaneously in a potential hot state and an actual hot state. Although, the wood in the actual hot state could be simultaneously potentially cold when the fire is extinguished. The following statement may be an aid in understanding potentiality and actuality. If an object is potentially F, the only way for it to become actually F is for it to be affected by something in a state of actuality. In another sense, whatever is doing the moving can be the thing that is moved in motion. This demonstrates that this process can be looked at in the shape of a circle.
The Term Paper on God’s Existence
The issue that I shall be addressing is whether a certain objection to a theistic explanation of God’s existence can be sustained. In this paper, the objection in question is advanced mostly by naturalists, and the thrust of it is that theists cannot provide a satisfactory account of God’s existence based on causality because occasional philosophical questions arise concerning the truth of the ...
The process consists of change that started from some other change, and the change continues in a cycle. If an object undergoes change, then there must be a cause of that change. The cycle is potential capability of a thing experiencing a change to become the actual. Then the actual will experience a change to go from potential to actual again, a cycle. The entire process of wood becoming hot from fire starts with a first mover causing a chain reaction of movement. In conclusion, since there is no infinity of action and all moving takes place in a cycle, therefore the person that is the first mover has never itself been moved (God-YXZYX).
In the end, Aquinas proves the unmoved mover is God. God is actually in motion and he causes the second motion.
God is the capability of going to potentially hot to actually hot in the movement. God is simultaneously actually hot and cold. God started all the movement and he responsible for all actuality which makes him everything and great. Saint Thomas Aquinas argument is a very plausible argument to me. I have been raised all of my life in the Catholic religion and I do truly believe that God exists. It was rather difficult to think of the existence of God in the way of wood and fire. I had a problem understanding the possibility of the movements being the same all the time.
If God was the first mover, then all movements should be in his favor. This raises the question of why are there so many religions that do not consider God to be the main first mover or that he even exists. Where did the moving alter people to discover ways of believing different gods? It is obvious that this is not taken into consideration in Aquinas argument. In the end, after examining all the factors, Aquinas argument makes complete sense and I believe the main idea is completely true. God is the first mover and he is responsible for the beginning of all moving. Aquinas proves this by explaining the mover of potentiality and actuality and how God is the entire process. Saint Thomas Aquinas teachings are highly favored by the Roman Catholic Church.
The Church encourages the main message that God is everything and everywhere. Aquinas proves that God started the movement of the world and that God was the originator. The same movement that moved the potential to the actual state continues the same process today, spreading the actuality of God.
The Term Paper on God’s Foreknowledge and the Problem of Evil
In his essay[1] on the possibility of God’s having middle knowledge of the actions of free agents and the relationship of that knowledge, if it exists, to the problem of evil,[2] RM Adams discusses two questions: firstly, whether middle knowledge is possible, even for God, and secondly, whether God could have made free creatures who would always freely do right. These questions highlight the ...
Bibliography:
Rene Descartes. Discourse on Method.
