Hamlet, Othello, Macbeth and King Lear are the four most prominent and revered works that William Shakespeare had ever produced, though the first three that I mentioned seem to be recognized as more superior to King Lear. The opinion of many critics and others who are familiar with the bards work, myself included, feel that King Lear is one of, if not, the greatest achievement in William Shakespeare’s repertoire. Many people, however, on the other side of the token, feel that King Lear is not his best play by far which puzzles me as a reader. To envision such a plot and story line filled with war, love, death, deceit, and madness was written in the early part of the 17 th century is virtually unimaginable and more likely to happen in the “anything goes” spectrum of today’s literature and television.
King Lear was written about 1605 and is very similar to its most recent predecessor, Othello (1604), in that both have the face of evil appear in its coldest and inhumane forms. Many of the intricacies in Othello seem to rub off in that of King Lear. I do wonder if the fact that both plays were written virtually one on top of the other that Shakespeare overlapped the two plots twisting and turning them just enough to maintain the separatism in both plays. Was Shakespeare writing both plays at the same time with his mind focused on a specific type of tragedy Was Shakespeare displeased with one or the other when he wrote them these are some of the questions that are raised in my mind when I read the similarities of the plays and comprehend how close together they were produced. In reading the texts on King Lear there seemed to be a vast amount of criticism concerning the play involving its adaptability for stage, its dramatic clearness, and its acceptability. The basis o King Lear’s unpopularity among the “fab’ four” seems to be due to the extreme painfulness of the catastrophe, its dramatic defects, and a failure to most readers to grasp peculiar effects that Shakespeare includes in the play.
The Essay on King Lear – Analytical Monologue
LEAR: It may be so, my lord. Hear, Nature, hear, dear goddess, hear!Suspend thy purpose if thou didst intend 270To make this creature fruitful. Into her womb convey sterility. Dry up in her the organs of increase,And from her derogate body never springA babe to honor her. If she must teem, 275Create her child of spleen, that it may liveAnd be a thwart disnatured torment to her. Let it stamp ...
Some feel that Shakespeare was a genius that had alternate meanings for many of his plot lines, including and especially King Lear. Lear’s insanity weakens his coherence and poetic imagination but it stimulates his time of reflection and moral perception. It is wonderful things like this that do make works such as King Lear one of the best works that William Shakespeare had ever produced.
