To Believe or Not to Believe The short narrative “Salvation” portrays the life of Langston Hughes at an early age confronted with the decision to “come forward” and be saved. His aunt’s church,” held a special meeting for children, ‘to bring the young lambs to the fold'” (Hughes, 197).
Throughout the story, he sits in his seat, his aunt Reed sobbing the whole time, congregation pressuring him to “come and be saved,” and waiting to see Jesus. Yet nothing ever happens-no “bright light,” no Jesus, nothing. The church is full of “a mighty wail of moans and voices” (198) waiting for Langston to get up and see Jesus. So he does.
He cannot wait any longer and lies to the entire congregation, simply saying he was saved, but only to save from any further trouble. In the end, he never “sees” Jesus, keeps his lie a secret from his aunt, believes there isn’t even a Jesus, and is farther from the truth than ever. The story does have good logic. It is understandable if someone is completely turned off to the gospel because they were pressured or forced to accept Christianity. It is not that person’s fault if that do dislike the truth of the Bible. It is, however, the fault of whomever was doing the witnessing.
They either did a terrible job presenting the gospel message, or they didn’t have any Scripture to back up their words. In Hughes’ case, the gospel presentation was the worst I’d ever heard: going from “a wonderful rhythmical sermon, all moans and shouts and lonely cries and dire pictures of hell, and then he sang a song about the ninety and nine safe in the fold, but one little lamb was left out in the cold” (197).
The Essay on Understandings of Jesus
There are probably as many understandings of Jesus as there are people who write, think or speak about him. If there was one historical Jesus, we approach that Jesus through four gospels, which suggests that even without including other gospels (so called non-canonical) Christians accept some diversity of images of Jesus. One Jesus of history produced many Christs of faith. Inside and outside ...
What a smooth transition. In my aunt’s case, she, too, was completely turned off to the gospel. At her husband’s funeral, two or three nuns came up to her and attempted to witness to her.
Attempted mind you. What may or may not shock some people (however not surprising to me), was that they blatantly told my aunt that her husband went to hell. Again, this is at her funeral. I do not know if he did or did not believe in Christ as his Savior-I was too young at the time-but what an unfortunate way to let her know about the grace of God. It is no wonder she is still turned off to the gospel to this day. As to what the essay is missing, I would very much like to know what type of church it was.
From what I gathered, it was most likely a Charismatic or Free Methodist. If I knew for sure, it would definitely answer a few questions I have. Overall, and one could easily guess as much, I disagree with the essay. It is a good story: non-fiction, descriptive, and informative as to what a “normal” service at his church was like. However, the gospel presentation and technique was detestable, the Scripture used was taken out of context, there is no “bright light” as mentioned in the story, and the author himself seemed to be Biblically uneducated.
The internet article I found, “The Effects of Early Religious Training: Implications for Counseling and Development” states that there is a considerable amount of anxiety (pressure) in connection with their deity (God).
It also emphasizes the fact that there is an enormous amount of negative mental and psychological effects associated with God that are both subtle and unhealthy. “The religion of childhood is of a very special order” (Fred Hanna; Rick Myer, 1 of 8).
Indeed, whatever a child is taught when he is young, he will believe for the rest of his life.
In addition, the article describes God as “a rigidly authoritative creature filled with contradictions,”a creator god who is loving while at the same time is potentially psychologically and physically abusing,” and having a “dichotomous, authoritative nature” (3 of 8) The essay and the article both agree with each other in the fact that Hughes was definitely affected for the worse after his disastrous encounter with religion. On the other hand, he did not appear to be affected mentally or psychologically as the internet article suggests, but seems to be perfectly healthy. Hughes’ only bad effect was his repulsion to the gospel. Also, due to the tremendous volume of pressure on him to be saved, he shuns Jesus in the end and, as mentioned before, doesn’t even believe in Him anymore. I disagree with the article because of its one main point: the insane obsession with any psychological and / or mental effects of religious compulsion on children at an early age. The only effect of religion that should be recognized should be that of a spiritual nature.
The Essay on Urbanism And Child Mental Health Journal Review
How much of an effect does your environment have on your mental health? Plenty. Does it mean you're doomed if your environment is supposedly negative? Not necessarily. What can we attribute the high rate of social and psychological problems in cities to? And, are urban areas predestined to be a hub for high social and psychological problems. The latter two are questions David Quinton is attempting ...
If there is any mental or psychological “damage,” then whoever was doing the witnessing went too far with their urgency to spread the gospel. In response to the accusations made in the article, God can be both loving and authoritative, just the way a father is to his children. With regards to “physically abusing,” the myth that God throws lightning bolts is just that: a myth. Therefore, the article’s reasoning to me went beyond informative to complete nonsense. In closing, I have learned how radical people’s ideas are with regards to trying to find Jesus. Their ways are sometimes ridiculous and twisted.
It is almost sad and disappointing.
