For hundreds of years, the two party system has dominated the American culture, but many people are confused by what a two party system actually means. Although a two party system is defined as two parties that are bigger than the rest, third parties have greatly impacted elections for over a hundred years. Minor parties still continuously voice their opinions in issues, causing other candidates of either major party to adopt their philosophies. Furthermore, some parties, such as the Reform have actually been successful in obtaining a position, such as governor.
Finally, third party candidates have actually taken away votes from a number of nominees over the years. Third parties have become a necessity in this modern age with their ability to promote their beliefs onto other parties who advocate those policies in later elections. Therefore, it is obvious that the viewpoints of the Democratic and Republican parties have been affected by minor parties. Throughout American history, minor parties have adjusted and formed new parties concerning the issues, so the two major parties must switch their position as the issues change, allowing for the acceptance of many third party ideas. For example, the Socialist Party is supposed to be responsible for President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal, which greatly helped many Americans.
The Term Paper on Political Parties Party Federalist American
... is true that American political system is basically a two-party system, third-parties or minor parties have played a role in American politics. Third parties have risen and ... have been ideological parties such as the Socialist Workers Party. There have also been one issue parties such as the Prohibition Party, which opposed the ...
This shows that many Presidents reflect on the ideas of other parties and adopt them during their tenure in office. In addition to the New Deal, minor parties Eugene Debs, who ran four times fighting for the factory workers, and Ross Perot, who endeavored to eradicate the national debt, both inspired Presidents to accept their policies. Warren G. Harding approved the ideas of Eugene Debs while Clinton actually turned the national debt into a surplus before leaving office. Factional parties, such as the Bull Moose Party have also influenced the major parties to change their views. The Bull Moose Party called for more attention to not only business regulations but also party reform.
Theodore Roosevelt was nominated for President and the Republican Party was forced to make a strong reform in their usual policy. These various examples, throughout the years, prove how strong the minor parties were in impacting the presidential elections through other parties. A third party has never seen the Oval Office, but they have held office a number of times as a senator, governor, and mayor. All of these positions influence the people to consider the presidential minor parties, thus having an impact on the presidential elections. When a party wins a local office as a minor party, the name of whatever the minor party is spreads around all the way around the United States. Not only does winning a local office help the victor, but it also helps the member of the same party who runs for President.
The most recent example of a third party winning an office is the Independent Senator, Jim Jeffords of Vermont. Jeffords, who was once a Republican, became an Independent because he felt he no longer supported the policies of George W. Bush’s Republican Party. With Jeffords’ transformation to the Independent Party, he has promoted the Independent Party over the last three years and continues to be a prominent figure in the modern Independent world. In terms of governor, Jesse Ventura was elected as the Reform Party’s Governor of Minnesota where he advocated and endorsed the typical Reform beliefs. Ventura shocked the world with the exception of other minor party candidates, who believed any party could win with a strong campaign.
The Essay on Electoral College Votes Election Vote
The Affects Of The Electoral College On The Significance And Legitimacy Of American Voting In the 1996 United States presidential election, only 49 percent of the voting age population cast a ballot (Federal Election Committee). Only 56 percent of whites voted, followed by 50 percent of African American, and only 27 percent of Hispanics (Federal Election Committee). With such low voter turnout, ...
Ventura has been credited with being one of the first few people to employ the Internet in a political campaign. The Green party in 2002 saw its greatest year of elections in its history with 71 new offices obtained. The Green Party then had a total of 170 officeholders around the United States, showing its continual growth as a political party. It has become less and less astonishing when a minor party wins nowadays, which causes more and more awareness of the party affecting the presidential elections.
It is very clear that minor parties have impacted elections in a positive matter, but they have also negatively hindered presidential elections in the past. The greatest example of this is the election of 2000, when George W. Bush defeated Al Gore by a very slim margin. Ralph Nader, who represented the Green Party, got 2. 74 percent of the vote and 2. 8 million in total votes.
These votes could have been exchanged with votes for Gore. In the past, those who voted for the Green Party, usually supported the Democratic Party when compared to the Republican Party. It is logical to say that Gore would have won both Florida and New Hampshire in 2000 if Nader never won. Bush won Florida by 0. 01% and New Hampshire by 1. 27%.
A poll was taken of a large number of Nader supporters. When posed the question, who would they vote for if Nader didn’t run: 46 percent would have favored Gore, 23 percent would have favored Bush, and 31 percent would have not voted. Obviously, Nader single handed ly impacted the 2000 Presidential Election. One more example of a minor party affecting the presidential election was in the 1912 Election where the previously mentioned Bull Moose Party attained four million of the popular vote. Even though Theodore Roosevelt only got 88 Electoral votes, the four million votes would have most likely been given to the traditional Republican Party if Roosevelt never ran.
The republicans had a 16 year rule in office broken by their split, showing the huge impact of third parties. Woodrow Wilson, along with the Democratic Party was elated after such a dramatic split occurred. Unfortunately, for the Republican and Bull Moose Party, the country split their vote as well with the Republicans receiving more than 3. 4 million votes, only a 700, 000 difference than the Bull Moose Party. The Socialist Party received a million votes which would have greatly impacted the election if the Republicans stuck together. This election, with the great split, showed both parties how essential it was to stick together because third parties can break off and take a large number of votes away from one of the major parties.
The Term Paper on Electoral College Reform Vote Election Votes
Since the fiasco that was the Presidential Election in the year 2000, many Americans have been calling for a reform of the Electoral College. Most of these people were Gore supporters; disillusioned by the fact that Bush won the office of the President while, in fact, he lost the popular vote. The American people did not elect George W. Bush; the Electoral College did. Last year's circumstance was ...
The last example shows the split of the Democratic Party that cost them the election in 1860. Republican, Abraham Lincoln defeated Northern Democrat, Stephen A. Douglass and Southern Democrat, John Breckinridge. The Democrats received a total of 2.
35 million votes combined, while Lincoln received about 1. 85 million of the popular vote. This shows how a split only causes losses while sticking together allows for victory according to statistics. Lincoln won only approximately 40 percent of the popular vote but still won presidency.
Obviously, third parties have changed many presidential elections in our nation’s history. Third parties have shown their mark on presidential elections throughout the United States’ history. Whether it was through other candidates adopting their policies, with their local success, or with their impact on elections, third party candidates have caused major change on various presidential elections. Minor parties will continue to impact other candidates and the rest of the country into adopting their views on certain issues. According to Nader, “The only difference between the Republican and Democratic parties is the velocities with which their knees hit the floor when corporations knock on their door.” Obviously third party candidates will continue to run and impact elections for years to come. web third parties.
html web.
