Do UFO’s Exist or Not For half a century the subject of UFO has been discussed by scientists, ecologists, politicians, and common people around the world. It seems paradoxical, but the main question of their discussion concerns existence or non-existence of UFO itself, so many people is not sure that the very subject of their debate really exists. I share the opinion of those who do not believe in UFO saying that this phenomenon has not been scientifically proved, and everything its adherents operates is conjecture and fantasy, and disconnected stories of those who allegedly have seen UFO are far from scientific explanation of the event. On the one hand, the very name UFO, which stands for Unidentified Flying Object uncovers the truth. Eyewitnesses do not know what exactly they have seen.
In most cases they cannot identify the object on the sky and call it UFO. It was proved that many such false “witnesses” see nothing but a plane or a planet on the sky. All of us know that UFO means, but we tend to forget that all that means is that the observers do not understand what they are looking at. The scientists explain that atmospheric phenomena like sun dogs, storm phenomena like ball lightning and stratospheric discharge, astronomical phenomena like auroras, meteorite storms and are all things that many of common people are not familiar with. The use of man made objects like weather balloons, test aircraft, reentry vehicles from space not to mention practical jokes also deceive many people (Vallee, 1990).
The Term Paper on UFO – Unidentified Flying Object
The Oxford English Dictionary defines a UFO as “An unidentified flying object; a ‘flying saucer’.” The word was first used in print by Donald Keyhoe in 1953.[1] The acronym “UFO” was coined by Capt. Edward J. Ruppelt, who headed Project Blue Book, then the USAF’s official investigation of UFOs. He wrote, “Obviously the term ‘flying saucer’ is ...
For instance, between 1950 and 1971, there were 14, 813 sightings reported to authorities, and 10, 625 of them (95%) have been identified and explained by natural phenomena or man-made influences. The fact that people do not know what something is that they see in the sky, does not automatically mean that there is an alien involved, and in fact it is obvious that most of the time it is a case of the observer simply not being informed about the world around them (Floyd, 1993).
Another important fact against trust to all evidence is that most people who “contacted” UFO had a loss of memory in the aftermath. These are cases in which a person reports some ostensibly paranormal experience outside the confines of a controlled, laboratory situation.
These include “telepathic and precognitive impressions, out-of-body experiences, memories of past lives, poltergeist cases, and apparitions” (Bullard, 1987).
Some scientists and psychologists specialized in the study of past-life memories in children, and carefully studied the use of interviews with witnesses as the main method of researching these cases, deny the true nature of such evidences. Taking into account the psychological explanation of this problem, it is possible to summarize that many of the persons who “witnesses” UFO live in the world of dreams and have some psychological problems, and the desire to be an extraordinary one push them to believe that witnessed UFO (Thompson, 2005).
In reality, many scientists were skeptical of both UFOs and of alien life in general; they contended that interstellar travel would be easy for advanced civilizations, so the lack of overt contact disproved alien existence. Yet most UFO opponents do believe alien life exists out in the universe, just not here.
So they defend the near impossibility of interstellar travel, which contradicts a considerable portion of the scientific community (Thompson, 1990).
The Essay on UFOs Fact or Myth
"Deep Throat: A military UFO? Mr. Mulder, why are those like yourself, who believe in the existence of extra terrestrial life on this Earth, not dissuaded by all the evidence to the contrary? Mulder: Because, all the evidence to the contrary, is not entirely dissuasive. Deep Throat: Precisely. Mulder: They're here, aren't they? Deep Throat: Mr. Mulder, they've been here for a long, long time." ...
“This fact allows reject evidence that would otherwise confirm the presence of a solid object under intelligent control with propulsion ir reproducible by human technology” (Thompson, 1990).
For instance, when a certain degree of physical substance for an airplane is obtained for an unconventional disk-shaped vehicle, this degree of evidence is accepted for the airplane but rejected for the anomalous vehicle (National UFO reported Center, 2005).
The problem is that people don’t have enough information to defend a low probability, and second of all, this approach guarantees automatic rejection of normal avenues of evidence. Effectively, what the scientists are saying is that radar evidence is too ‘ordinary’ to suffice for an ‘extraordinary’ claim.
They succeed in eliminating from review all types of indirect and direct evidence, except for physical proof (Vallee, 1990).
No matter how directly the observations indicate anomalous mechanisms of nonhuman origin, scientists suppose that a simple explanation must be adopted unless physical proof is obtained. “Normal standards of science would require meeting the evidential threshold for each of the above conditions necessary to establish extraterrestrial origin; yet the same degree of evidence for physical substance is rejected for anomalous vehicles when it would otherwise be accepted for observations of more conventional vehicles” (Thompson, 1990).
The most important feature is that people who reject the UFO existence are primarily scientists, and those who try to prove it is just an average populists who are interested in some scientific areas, but do not involved in any of them on the professional level. The other important fact proved that UFO does not exist is official governments rejection of this phenomenon. Many opponents try to use this very fact as the main argument, supposing that it is a secret because it exists, but if people think this way our society would live in chaos of surmises, fears and total distrust.
It should be noted that any government does everything in order to protect its citizens. And in this very case it is just a good prove for those who cannot confirm the existence of UFO. It is possible to conclude that UFO does not exist because for half a century no scientific evidence has been found in order to prove it. In the world there are a lot of objects which is difficult to identify by a common person, and that is why to explain unknown flying objects they invented the notion of UFO. In reality, except a small group of people, “ufologists”, any other institution on the governments level or independent scientific community cannot prove the facts of UFO existence based on the evidence provided by its “supporters.” References 1. Bullard, Thomas Edward.
The Term Paper on Ozone People Fact Scientist
The Ozone a Hole in the Theory The protective ozone layer around our world undergoes much thought and debate. The 'Hole', however, only exists in the minds of environmental, self-serving scientists and politicians. It interests many to find all the faults in the publics consensus of the 'ozone depletion.' Most scientists do not believe in this 'depletion', they think it is a natural phenomenon. ...
UFO Abductions: The Measure of a Mystery. Vol. 1: Comparative Study of Abduction Reports. Bloomington, IND, 1987. 2. Floyd, E.
Randall Ghost lights, and other encounters with the unknown. First Edition. Little Rock: August House Publishers, 1993. 3. National UFO reported Center.
2005, Available at: web Thompson, K. Angels and Aliens: UFOs and the Mythic Imagination, New York: Ballantine Books, 1990. 5. Thompson, R. Alien Identities. 2005, Available at: web Vallee, J.
Confrontations: A Scientist’s Search for Alien Contact, Ballantine Books, New York, 1990.
