Irony is a strategy writers use to set contrast between what is supposed to be true and what is reality, just as in verbal irony, an author might say or write one thing and at the same time mean the complete opposite. In the story by Frank R. Stockton “The Lady, or the Tiger?” the author used verbal irony to help us realize the absurdity of the king’s idea of judgment and the real intentions and ideas of other characters.
Several ironic statements are presented in the story. Sentence fragments such as “… did not the accused person have the whole matter in his own hands?” include verbal irony. Regardless of the fact that you may assume it to be true, that the accused person indeed is given option, that he during his trial can open either door, that he can decide his own path, concluding that he does have the matter in his own hands, still, even though he is given choice, his choice does not fully depend on his deeds in life, nor does it depend on the crime that was done by him, it is a chance that the accused is supposed to take. He cannot know what is hidden behind each of the doors (he only knows that behind one of the doors is a tiger, and behind the other is the lady.).
He may’ve not been in such situation at all if he really has had the alternative. Indeed, the king is forcing the accused to be judged this way.
Oedipus Irony Essay Dramatic Verbal Sophocles
Irony Oedipus the King Oedipus is self-confident, intelligent and strong willed. Ironically these are the very traits which bring about his demise. Sophocles makes liberal use of irony throughout "Oedipus the King." He creates various situations in which dramatic and verbal irony play key roles in the downfall of Oedipus. Dramatic irony depends on the audience's knowing something that the ...
May be if the king may’ve not been the judge in this matter, accused will rather prefer to be released, but he cannot decide that for himself. Furthermore, statement “… crime was punished or virtue rewarded, by the decrees of an impartial and incorruptible chance.” contains verbal irony also. By looking at the facts, you can see that a person is forced to be judged by this system, he is required to make his decision, although he may like neither solution. It is probable that the accused will not have any advantage over the others in the tribunal. In overall, the assumption is that the system is unjust and corrupt for the accused person. That person may’ve done nothing to be punished for, but he still may be torn to peaces if the tiger emerges from the door he’d selected. And, in another case, the one who’s guilty will be rewarded when he is supposed to be punished. This kind of verdict is neither fair, nor is it moral.
Statement “The decisions of the tribunal were not only fair, they were positively determinate….” proves that for those who gather in the arena it is thought to be more of an entertainment. The public thinks it to be fair and agrees with the king. They have the advantage. They are not accused, standing anxious and wondering whether luck would be on their side. Those people are amused by the problems of others. They are eager to see this judgment and once again be “surprised” by the outcome. Those and other ironic statements in the story “The Lady or the Tiger?” helps to build your opinion without the idea being stated by the author.
The irony is what makes us think and see the reality, to evaluate it, and to understand the contrast between the joke and truth. Even the events in your life have irony, when one may say one thing and mean the other. Irony is an important element in literature as well as in real life.
