Nature or nurture? The video we watched in class regarding society’s take on sexuality roles provoked much food for thought. Before this video, I had formed my own opinions on the subject when reading zines and random online articles. It’s a popular subject that I see addressed over and over again, especially by teenagers my own age — which makes sense, I guess, this supposedly being the time where we come into our own by searching for that “identity.” Previously, I did think much of our ways stemmed from mainstream media, inherited behaviors, and the spoonfed ideas of “boys don’t cry”, etc. Concepts like what defined masculinity and femininity, I felt, had a lot to do with the way we were brought up and the ideas we unconsciously received from those around us while growing up. Because our behavior parrots what we see around us or think we see around us, it makes sense that we’d regard those behaviors as the norm. This video convinced me to approach the idea of gender role from a different angle, in that the aforementioned behaviors stem from something innate.
The experiments performed with the children were especially convincing. Despite the parents’ claims of raising the children “equally”, the girls continued to zip for the dolls and play house, and the boys still ran towards the trucks and launch into violent battles. Those who deviated from the popular result were deviations themselves: the girls with extra testosterone, etc. I found the woman rights activist, who was intent on denying all evidence that gender differences were biological, to be rather irritating in her stubbornness.
The Term Paper on Comprehensive Classroom Behavior Management Plan
... expectations to a group with differing ideas of what learning, school, science and good behavior are. By explicitly stating the ... interventions, supports, and consequences that will change inappropriate behaviors into desired behaviors. ABC data collection can make a teacher’s and ... specified period of time. Earn points for a class video. 15 minutes of free choice activity. Work with a ...
The entire study showed good evidence that in fact, women and men aren’t the same. It wasn’t being said that women were “lower” than men, or vice versa; just that the strengths and weaknesses of each gender differed, and for unchangeable reason. They are both biologically and physically different, things that have to be taken into consideration. If we were all the same, this reaction paper wouldn’t even exist. Still, the host of the video was a little condescending when denouncing her life’s work, so one really can’t blame her. She must ” ve felt that acquiescing to him would ” ve meant accepting that woman are weaker in general, which isn’t accurate a claim.
I don’t find it fair to lower the standards for women when considering jobs like that of a firefighter. It just seems obvious that while balancing the cons and pros, the prospect of lives at risk much outweigh a woman’s right to the job. If a woman can accomplish the same as the next man, and pass the physical test as well, then there is no reason she shouldn’t be accepted. But if she happens to fall short, well, that difference could mean someone’s life. And since when does a life matter that little?
