The Guillotine is the ultimate expression of law… it is not neutral, nor does it allow us to remain neutral. He who sees it shudders with an inexplicable dismay. All social questions achieve their finality around that blade. The “French Revolution” can be regarded as one of the bloodiest revolutions in history. It was responsible for many deaths and massacres, which have since been chanted endlessly throughout history’s revelations.
This essay will analyse the origins of violence in the ‘French Revolution’. Although the cause of French revolutionary violence can be lost in a complex web of opinions among Historians, cause and timing of revolutionary violence do not necessarily compliment each other. In order to understand the cause of the violence, an explanation of the historical circumstances leading to the revolution are necessary. These are elaborated under three subheadings; o Longstanding Causes o Midway to Initial Causes o Initial Causes Each of these played a role to the lead up to the ‘French Revolution’. However, this essay will briefly outline the first two, and attempt to explain the start of violence by associating it with the ‘initial causes’ of the ‘French Revolution’. Aya’s study on ‘Theories of Revolution’s ugg ests that “[o]fte n enough…
The Essay on Turning Points Neolithic Revolution French Revolution And The Industrial Revolution
Political, social, and economic conditions have often led to revolutions that have changed the course of history for nations and peoples. These revolutions had such a significant impact that they can fittingly be labeled turning points. Two of these turning points, the Neolithic and French Revolutions, have drastically altered the world today. During the Paleolithic Period, which lasted from the ...
such violent outbreaks can be understood only if attention is paid to long-term shifts of power balances in the society concerned which, to be sure, take place in small steps over a long time.” Longstanding Causes. These can be associated with problematic features of the ‘ancien regime.’ “It is clear that ever since the death of Louis XIV the idea of absolute monarchy had blocked all efforts at revamping the political system”, especially if the monarch were to be weak (as Louis XVI was).
Other major problematic features can be seen within the division of population between three estates. The first and second estates were made up of the aristocracy and considered privileged and the ‘third estate,’ holding the majority, were under privileged. Longstanding problems also consisted of economic difficulties that led to financial problems, and discontentment from peasants. Midway to Initial Causes.
These consist of the failure to initiate tax reform, in which the aristocrats were exempt from paying, and military expenses associated with a ‘revenge’ war against the British in America at a time when the national economy was in a strong decline. As Guerin stated, “they shifted the heavy burden of military expenditure on to the shoulders of the people.” Initial Causes. The initial lead up to the causes of violence in the ‘French Revolution’ can be seen in the year 1788. France suffered serious financial problems and a conflict within its division of classes.
De Tocqueville noted that: [T]he cleavages between the various classes… weakened the whole fabric of society, and particularly on the hostility of the nobles towards the royal administration. All estates seemed unsatisfied with the ‘ancien regime’, and Louis XVI neither had the initiative, nor the will to win the support of his people, especially within the third estate which incorporated a majority of the population. Eventually the introduction of reform took place. However, “Its biggest attempt at reform, the establishment of provincial assemblies…
The Business plan on Challenges of Management of Public Residential Estate in Ebony State
Chapter one 1.Introduction Although residential estate is one of the most stable and profitable investment opportunities available it is the Virtual Residential estate that is the new gold rush. The revolution is happening right under our eyes with new millionaires being created every minute even as you read this article. It is just the beginning of the new wave of wealth creation. Such unique ...
had the effect of throwing the administration into disorder.” It was “truly observed that the moment when a bad government tries to reform itself is always the most dangerous.” We have come to realise that many of the greatest revolutions were not started by people who were slummed in adversary without hope or vision but rather they seem to begin when people start to prosper and understand how much they still have left to achieve. As De Tocqueville stated: It is not always by going from bad to worse that a society falls into a revolution. It happens most often that a people, which has supported without complaint, as if they were not felt, the most oppressive laws, violently throws them off as soon as their weight is lightened. These occurrences placed Louis under considerable pressure. On the 8 th of August 1788, Louis summoned the ‘States General’.
Louis knew: [I]f the estates were organised, as in 1614, with an equal number of representatives, and if each order voted separately, the clergy and the nobility would be able to enforce their will on the third estate. However, as a result of the ‘States General’ further hate developed against the ‘ancien regime’, and on the 17 th of June 1789, the ‘Third Estate’, made up of the majority of the population and consisting of the bourgeoisie, wage earners and peasantry, declared themselves (against King Louis Beliefs) ‘The Representative Body of France’ (The National Assembly).
This was to go against King Louis opinions. Orders were given to the Grand Master of Ceremonies to make the necessary preparations and to close the main assembly hall used by the deputies of the third estate. However, they were not to be intimidated and instead this led them to the infamous, ‘Tennis Court Oath’. Here it was resolved by acclamation that the members of the National Assembly should take a solemn oath, to be confirmed by their signatures, not to separate until the constitution had been established on firm foundations.
The Essay on National Constituent Assembly France People Reforms
To what extent did the reforms of the Constituent Assembly create discontent? The National Constituent Assembly solved some of Frances short term problems, but caused significant discontent due to its inability to resolve long term problems, that had been destroying France economically, politically and socially. There were some groups of society that were quite content with the reforms of the ...
It is further important to note that; “[t]his celebrated oath was historically significant as the first act of formal disobedience to the king.” The ‘National Assembly’ gained a rise in support and soon Louis was forced to recognise it. Absolute Monarchy had ended and Constitutional Monarchy had begun. The ‘National Assembly’ was regarded as the parliament of France and the Bourgeoisie were soon recognised as having the most powerful stake. On 13 th July, the act of violence was conceived when rioters burglarized from the monastery of St Lazare. This convent was unpopular because it was used as a prison and was also suspected of being a centre for the storage of grains and an arms depot.
On July 14 th, 1789 the peasants stormed the Bastille. This signified the first use of violence to achieve Revolutionary aims. “The assault was not primarily to liberate the prisoners… but to get arms… [T]he Bastille was a symbol of despotism.” In 1789, the ‘French Revolution’ was a Revolution against feudalism.
It turned peasants to being free landowners and essentially laid down the foundation towards Capitalism. [T]his essential achievement of the years 1789 to 1792… [saw] the middle class [become] a privileged oligarchy in place of the hitherto privileged, the feudal aristocracy. The Revolution arguably achieved its purpose in history. De Tocqueville would suggest that his “aim was to show [violence in] the Revolution as the natural conclusion to the long-term evolution of the ancien regime. While Marx suggests that: The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society, has not done away with class antagonisms.
It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones. The Revolution was complex in its guise, but demonstrated the French people’s desire / need for certain change. Be it through violence or oligarchy, change was inevitable and the will of the people and their efforts, beneath certain oppression and positive identifiable distractions achieved vast accomplishments. BIBLIOGRAPHY Aras se, Daniel, The Guillotine and the Terror, Penguin Books, England, 1991. Aya, Roderick, Theories of Revolution Reconsidered: Contrasting Models of Collective Violence, Theory and Society, 8, 1, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, (1979), pp. 39-79.
The Essay on Was The Industrial Revolution Good Or Bad For Society
Was The Industrial Revolution Good or Bad For Society. In my opinion I think this was the best thing that happened to Europe. Where do you really think England would be if the country did not Revolve? It would most likely be a third world country with out it. England was blessed with good harbors, natural resources, and a favorable climate. Who wouldn't take this opportunity to try and make the ...
Cobb an, Alfred, Historians and the Causes of the French Revolution, (3 rd ed), The Historical Association, (1965).
De Tocqueville, Alex, (Quote) in Lockwood, David, Lecture given, 5 th August 2002, History’s Killing Fields, Hist 1704. Elton, Lord, The Revolutionary Idea in France 1789-1871, AMS Press Inc, New York, (1971).
Fret, Francois, Interpreting the French Revolution, translated by El borg Forster, Cambridge University Press, (1981).
Gershon, Leo, The Era of the French Revolution, 1789-1799: Ten Years That Shook the World, D.
Van Nostrand Company, Canada, (1857).
Goodwin, A, The French Revolution, (5 th Ed. ), Hutchinson and Co, London, (1970).
Guerin, Daniel, Class Struggle in the First French Republic, Pluto Press, (1977).
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich, Bourgeois and Proletarians, in Davies, C, James (ed), When Men Revolt and Why, The Free Press, New York, (1971), pp. 100-107.
The Standard English Desk Dictionary, Bay Books, Sydney, (1976), (Vol. A-L), p. 26.
