Slouka’s target audience seems to be the young adults in the United States because they are the group being affected by this shift in studies in colleges and universities, although our elders should be equally concerned with the rising problem at hand. Whilst I believe math and science to be extremely important in our modern world, I also agree with Slouka’s view stating humanities are essential to an individual’s development.
Proven to be vital to everyday life, math and science are the foundations on which our country needs to grow, but humanities such as english, history, and sociology(just to name a few), are also important in the development of individuals to be constructive members of our society. Slouka’s use of personal stories, personal experience, and passion towards the issue show a great deal of effective rhetoric, while his jealousy towards the issue tends to make his argument less effective.
In his essay, Slouka argues that humanity studies are starting to be brushed under the carpet more and more in today’s society. With the use of a personal story involving his mother-in-law, Slouka establishes an emotional credibility to his audience. When introduced, he is questioned about his field of study, with her asking “A doctor of philosophy? What are you going to do, open a philosophy store? ” With this personal story, Slouka immediately connects to his audience by showing his everyday struggle with people looking down on such fields of humanities.
The Essay on Mark Slouka, Crossing
A strong and trustful father-son relationship, I suppose, is any father’s greatest wish. But how do you get such a close relationship that binds the father and son faithfully together? With such a close relationship to each other, you will, when you turn into a grown-up man, really appreciate the family bond, and might have the desire to pass it on, to your own son. That is one of the main themes ...
This serves a great purpose at the beginning of his argument, by expressing his concern for the shadowing of such fields by mathematics and science, Slouka begins to express the everyday importance of these fields for communicating with one another. Humanities are required for the development of an individual’s creativity and expression, without these skills our society would be monotonous and bland. Our nation was built on the ideals of freedom and democracy, and although math and science help us to progress economically and technologically, they don’t help individuals to express themselves to be effectively represented by our government.
Furthermore, Slouka states that he is not taking away from the importance of math and science, he is merely stressing the equal importance of humanities. Despite the fact that Slouka seems jealous and mocking towards math and science at some parts in his essay, he does an equally effective job of stating their necessity to everyday life. While expressing his idea of what teaching is for, Slouka states “It’s about investing in our human capital… it’s about ensuring that the United States does not fall from its privileged perch in the global economy. Despite the fact businesses look for individuals who are experienced in such areas as math and science, they are also interested in the ability to problem solve and be creative, which cannot be taught by math and science alone. Slouka’s goal is for the United State’s education system to find an equilibrium between what he likes to call ‘mathandscience’ and the humanities. If an individual is an excellent problem solver but lacks the vocabulary or awareness to express them self, they are not helping society to their full potential. In addition, Slouka argues that math and science “don’t do democracy well. Slouka states “Not only are the sciences, with a few notable exceptions, politically neutral; their specialized languages tend to separate them from the wider population, making idealogical contagion difficult. ” He is stating that although math and science are important, the communication skills learned from humanities are crucial in the explanation and acceptance of such topics. I believe Slouka is alluding to the idea that although science is always changing with new discoveries and observations, math and science together tend to be more black and white, and the grey areas are the humanities.
The Essay on Sciences And The Human Science Humanities Social
1. What was Galileo's achievement? Galileo's achievement was to discredit, once and for all, the long - cherished view that the earth is the centre of a universe whose sole purpose is the sustaining of human life. The world, Galileo claimed is not always as we see it. He went on further to suggest that overnight we humans became bit - part players in a drama whose stage dwarfed us by its ...
In order for one to be represented efficiently in a democracy, they must be able to voice their opinion, aided by such subjects as english and history. Along with self expression, humanities are essential to society in teaching history as to not be repeated, showing cultural change and development over the years, and helping us to understand more about society as a whole. Slouka is very passionate throughout his argument about the equal importance of these different fields of study, and maintains that a well rounded society needs to focus not only on math and science, but also on the humanities.
Slouka’s use of social, political, emotional, and cultural appeals are effective in his argument that math and science should not overcome the importance of the humanities. This essay addresses the concerns of a whole nation, although it seemingly targets the young adults in our country that are attending colleges or universities. As our country continues to develop and progress as a whole, an equilibrium must be found between the various studies in our school systems. Slouka’s argument is not meant to discount the value of math and science, it is merely to stress the importance of furthered knowledge of humanity studies.
The concern brought about by Slouka’s essay is that our nation will lose sight of creativity and individuality, the basis of democracy, if it continues to steer away from the importance of humanities. In the grand scheme of things I do not believe that our country will ever lose sight of individuality since it plays such a large role in our freedom, but Slouka is correct in the sense that humanities are very important to the development and understanding of these aspects of society.
The use of emotional, logical, and ethical claims are effective in getting Slouka’s point across. I agree with Slouka’s argument that not enough importance is being put on these fields of study, and they are valuable to our nation’s development. Without such a extensive knowledge of rhetoric and vocabulary, Slouka would’ve had a tough time expressing his argument in such a well-informed way, which in itself stresses the need for humanity studies in today’s society.
The Term Paper on Arguments Of Today's Society
I. Benefits of Legalization Currently most everywhere in the United States, our legal system penalizes prostitutes and their customers for what they do as consenting adults. Money is still spent on law enforcement efforts to catch prostitutes and their customers. Once caught, justice departments have to process these people through very expensive systems. What are the end results? Police personnel ...
