There are times in history that something will happen and it will defy all logic. It was one of those times when a few Greek city / states joined together and defeated the invasion force of the massive Persian Empire. The Greeks were able to win the Greco-Persian War because of their naval victories over the Persians, a few key strategic victories on land, as well as the cause for which they were fighting. The naval victories were the most important contribution to the overall success against the Persians. The Persian fleet was protecting the land forces from being outflanked and after they were defeated the longer had that protection. While the Greeks had very few overall victories in battle they did have some strategic victories.
The Battle of Thermopylae is an example of a strategic success for the Greeks. The morale of the Persian army was extremely affected by the stout resistance put up by King Leonidas and his fellow Spartans. The Greeks fought so hard against overwhelming odds because of what they were fighting for. They were fighting for their country and their freedom. They fought so hard because they did not want to let down the man next to them in the formation. Several things contributed to the Greeks success against the Persian invasion that happened during the Second Greco-Persian War.
The main reason that the Greeks were able to win the Second Greco-Persian War was the fact that their victory on the sea dealt a crippling blow to the land army. The Greeks owe their naval success to a man named Themistocles. If it had not been for him then Athens would have not used some newly found silver to build 200 new ships for their navy. These ships were later used in the war against the Persians. The two forces were working in unison and they were dependent upon each other for victory.
The Term Paper on Greek victory over the Persians in 490 to 480/479 BC
Assess the reasons for the Greek victory over the Persians in 490 to 480/479 BC. Make a judgement based on outcome, results and values. The reasons for the Greek victory against the Persians in 490 to 480/479 BC was a mixture of exceptional leadership, skilful tactics and strategy, superior weapons and soldiers, and Greek unity. Strong leadership was the most important aspect of the Greek defence, ...
The Persian naval forces were there in order to protect the flank of the army’s advance. If the Persian navy were not present then the Greeks would have been able to get on ships and sail to a spot behind the Persian lines and outflank them. They also delivered supplies to the armies that were necessary for its survival. The deathblow was dealt at the Battle of Salamis.
It was a culmination of misfortune for the Persian navy. The Persians lost many ships to bad weather conditions. That is the only thing that allowed the Greeks a chance to win. If it had not been for those losses in the storms then the Greeks would been up against two ships for each one of theirs. A large Persian contingent of about 200 ships was destroyed while on maneuver to get behind the Greek navy. More tragedy would strike the Persians when stormy weather struck and damaged their ships during the Battle of Artemisium.
The Battle of Salamis was the icing on the cake for the Greeks. They were able to defeat the larger Persian fleet by dictating the terms of the battle. They choose a location that favored their smaller swifter ships instead of the much larger, heavier Persian ones. The Greeks were able to maneuver and ram the Persians at will and had most of the Persian fleet in check by nightfall.
The funny thing about it is that Xerxes had a throne set up for him on the island of Salamis to watch the battle. After the Greeks victory here they had control of the seas. This restricted the Persian fleet from keeping the army supplied and protected. Xerxes took the remaining elements of his fleet and headed back to Asia after the battle. The victory that sealed the deal for the Greeks was the Battle of Plataea. It took place the following spring after the Persian general Mardonius wintered in Thessaly with the Persian army.
Hoplite’s from Athens and Pelopennesia combined to make the largest army in Greek history. A Spartan king, Pausanias, who routed the Persian army and killed their general, led them. The Greek ground forces achieved some strategic success as well. They were able to affect the will of the non-regular soldiers to fight. One example in particular is the great Greek stand at Thermopylae.
The Essay on Alexander Iii Persian Greek Horse
Alexander III According to Plutarch, Alexander was born on the sixth of Hecatomb aeon (July) in the year 356 B. C. He was the son of Philip, king of Macedon, and Olympias. Supposedly on the day he was born the temple of Artemis burnt down, signifying his future glory. Not much is known of the youth of Alexander. Itis known that he was taught by Aristotle and had a love of the Greek epic poems. One ...
King Leonidas of Sparta led the forces at Thermopylae. He and his forces, which numbered about 7, 000, were greatly outnumbered by the Persian army, which consisted of about 250, 000 soldiers made up from many different nations. The Greeks were able to hold out for two days of unrelenting attacks from Xerxes’ troops. On one certain occasion he even sent his Immortals against the Spartans and their allies. The Immortals were professionally trained soldiers just like the Spartans.
The Persian Immortals were not able to turn the tide against the defenders. The rest of the Persian army was greatly affected by someone repelling the Immortals, as it was the first time that it had been done. The Spartans would probably have been able to hold off a little while longer had a traitor not told Xerxes about a goat path the bypassed the main Greek force. It was also a victory because the Greeks inflicted large losses on the Persians. Xerxes buried all of his dead so that people would not be able to see the casualties inflicted during the battle. This lost had to have quite an affect on his army, to be beat back by so few troops when such a large army is at your disposal.
Granted it was a very defendable position, but still they should have been able to overwhelm them. Xerxes is said to have gotten up from his throne several times over the concern for his army. It is no wonder why the exiled Spartan king Demaratus spoke so highly of his people’s will to fight. There was also action happening on the Aegean Sea during the Battle of Thermopylae as the Greek navy took on a separated Persian fleet.
The Greeks also had strategic success in the Battle of Artemisium on the Aegean Sea. This battle lasted as many days as the Battle of Thermopylae. It started off with both fleets sizing each other up, but what was really happening was that 200 Persian ships were sailing around the island in order to outflank them. The Greeks took up the tactic of attacking small groups of the Persian fleet because they were so spread out. This worked to the advantage to the Greeks with their smaller ships as the were able to attack the scattered Persian’s and get out before the majority of the Persian ships could be brought into the fight.
The Term Paper on The Battle Of D Day
The Battle of D-Day Introduction I. What were the events that happened before D-Day? A. When would the invasion happen? B. The build up of men, boats, and planes in England. C. The invasion was postponed. II. The invasion begins. A. When and where did the invasion happen? B. What happened at the five landing sites? C. What went wrong? III. The invasion ends. A. How long did it take? B. How many ...
After the first day the Greeks were able to capture 30 Persian ships. The Greeks again caught a lucky break when the before mentioned squadron of ships struck disaster of the coast of Euboea when they were smashed against rocks. Some reinforcements arrived the next day for the Athenian contingent and they are put to use right away to destroy some Cilicia n ships in the Persian fleet. On the third day the fleets were evenly matched and the Greeks suffered heavy losses and chose to retreat. The Greeks had great motivation to repel the Persians too. They were fighting for their country and for the lives of their fellow countrymen.
The Persians were threatening everything about their culture. Who know how rest of the world would develop had the Greeks not preserved their way of life? Who would the Romans look towards for inspiration about their own culture? They fought for the guy next to them in formation also. His survival while in the phalanx depended on what you did. You had to stay at the same pace as the rest of the formation. Even the slightest break in formation could mean losing a battle. It was no easy task.
The hoplite wore an average of 65 pounds of armor. They wore a five-pound helmet that didn’t allow a very good field of vision. They only way they could tell how things were going on the battlefield was feeling the pressure of the men around them. In most cases these men weren’t training together regularly, the Spartans did of course. The guy next to them would most likely be from their city / state , too. This would put added pressure on the other man to make sure he doesn’t look like a coward.
The phalanx depended on every single individual in order to work right. The Greeks were able to repel the overwhelming and seemly unstoppable Persian Empire. They were able to do so because of the victories won thanks to the Athenian navy in the Aegean Sea, the hard fought and strategically important battles that the Spartans just would not give up during and they were able to put aside their differences in order to face the greater threat for the good or their culture. Each major city / state contributed what it was good at.
The Essay on Ancient Greek History
Building Background Slide: Main Idea Bullet: There was a time in Ancient Greek history where the disconnect between supernatural believers and un-supernatural believers grew. This disconnect led to disputes mainly between philosophers and ordinary religious followers. Despite the famous philosophers having radical views on ideas that were accepted for many years before thy came along, as you will ...
It was a nice display of teamwork. Works Cited Herodotus. “Greece Saved from Persian Conquest.” Readings in Ancient History. Eds. Nels M. Bailkey and Richard Lim.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002. Herodotus. The History of Herod us. MIT. December 10, 2004. Herodotus.
“Greece Saved from Persian Conquest.” Reading in Ancient History. Eds. Nels. Bailkey and Richard Lim.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002. Nagle, D. Brendan. “The Second Persian Invasion” The Ancient World; A social and Cultural History. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002.
