Neville Chamberlain and Winston Churchill were contemporaries of Hitler, and each had his own opinion about appeasing him. They completely disagreed about what In Neville Chamberlain?s speech In Defense Of Appeasement he supports ?peace? at all costs for Europe, regardless of any other factors. He believed that the Czech Government should agree to give Germany the territory that it wanted, and in time, the population concerned would be treated fairly under their rule. Chamberlain said that no matter how much Britain wanted to help Czechoslavakia in their time of need, they could not involve the entire British Empire in war because of one small nation. He was ?a man of peace?(Perry 373) and did not think that Germany, or any other nation was planning to dominate the world by force. If this was the case, it would have to be very clear that the nation had ill intentions, and it was the great issues that were at stake, only then would prompt action be taken, in war if necessary. Calmly waiting to see what events occurred next was Chamberlain?s answer to the people?s questions. He states: ?As long as war has not begun, there is always hope that it may be prevented, and you know that I am going to work for peace to the very last moment Chamberlain wanted the whole of Europe to remain safe and peaceful. If this meant that Czechoslavakia must sacrifice its freedom and homeland, according to him, it was worth it in order to maintain peace. He received letters from people saying that they saw no reason to fight. ?That is my answer to those who say that we should have told Germany weeks ago that, if her army crossed the border to Czechoslavakia, we should be at war with her?(373).
The Essay on World War Ii Nations Freedom United
The immediate causes of World War II were some basic causes, which may be summarized as follows: (1) Aggressive nationalism and imperialism on the part of Germany, Italy, and Japan; (2) The development of new alliances; (3) The collapse of collective security; (4) Appeasement; (5) Fascism and its doctrines of national aggression, racism, violence and disregard of human rights by Mussolini; (6) The ...
Because Britain had no legal obligations to Czechoslavakia, he believed that the people of his nation would have given no support of the war. He was thoroughly convinced that there was nothing that could keep the Sudetenland within the Czechoslavakian State, and urged them to submit to German powers. The government accepted the advice of the French and British Governments.
Chamberlain did not view this as betrayal, but rather, ?what we did was to save her from annihilation and give her a chance of new life as a new state (373).
This involved the loss of territory and strength, but a chance at enjoying the benefits of a national existence which was neutral and secure in his mind. Neville Chamberlain, therefore thought that ?the government deserve the approval of this House (Britain?s House of Commons) for their conduct of affairs in this recent crisis which has saved Czechoslavakia from destruction and Europe from Armageddon?(373).
Obviously, Chamberlain believed that Czechoslavakia?s future under German rule was bright, and would work out fine. By remaining passive he did not have to take any risks. He believed that if Britain was to interfere with Czechoslavakia?s conflict it would mean great insecurity and danger for all of Great Britain and Europe. Winston Churchill?s speech, A Disaster Of The First Magnitude was a response attacking the Munich agreement and British policy toward Germany. Churchill believed Czechoslavakia would have been able to make better terms than they go without Western Powers interfering. He states: ?I have always held the view that the maintenance of peace depends upon the aggressor, coupled with a sincere effort to redress grievances (374).
This demonstrates how Churchill believed in taking action to resist dictatorship, as Chamberlain was passive. France, Great Britain, and Russia, if they would have worked together, could have influenced many of the smaller states of Europe, and Poland. This could have given power and strength to the forces in Germany who had influence in military and government affairs, and did not want to annex the Sudetenland. Many Germans shared in an intense desire for peace. Britain should have declared immediately that she, with others would join to defend Czechoslavakia against their aggression, which the government refused to do. ?Silent, mournful, abandoned, broken, Czechoslavakia recedes into the darkness(374).
The Essay on Which Of The Five Great Powers Of Europe Was The Strongest In 1914?
In Europe in 1914, there were five great powers. They were Britain, Germany, Russia, Austria-Hungary and France. Some were stronger in times of conflict than others, and many historians feel differently about the powers. This essay will use data to prove conclusively, an opinion held by many historians of which were the strongest and which were the weakest. Russia and Austria-Hungary were the two ...
The nation suffered in every way possible because of its affiliation with the Western democracies and the League of Nations. Czechoslavakia was politically damaged, and was in total confusion economically and financially. There was major movement of the population. Sudeten miners had to flee from their homes in order to try and find work, which was scarce. According to Churchill it would have been impossible for the Czechoslavakian State to remain an independent system, and would eventually be absorbed into the Nazi regime, joining out of either despair or revenge. Churchill believed that action should have been taken for the previous five years. That unavailing good intention, very little resistance to German power, and ineffective use of defenses all contributed to the final result of Czechoslavakia being annexed. And in those five years Great Britain and France had been reduced from a position of safety, security, and power to a frightened, passive nation under the domination of Nazi Germany. All of the opportunities that Europe had of seizing Nazi power were disregarded. Alliances could have been formed, and resources used in order to suppress Germany. ?They neither prevented Germany from rearming, nor did they rearm ourselves in time? (375).
Because these issues were neglected, Europe was left ?without adequate national defense or effective international security?(375) at a very crucial point in time. All of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe would now just settle for the best terms possible with the victorious Nazi power. Central Europe?s alliances fell apart, and there was really no way of reconstitution because of Germany?s immense power. By allowing Germany to annex Czechoslavakia, some people believed that they were only surrendering the interests of that one small country. Churchill looked at the big picture and saw the relationship between Czechoslavakia and all of Europe. He states: ?we have deeply compromised, and perhaps fatally endangered the safety and even the independence of Great Britain and France…(T)here can never be friendship between the British democracy and the Nazi Power?(376).
The Essay on Germany Depression Nazis People
The Nazis made valuable use of the time they had in parliament and became a strong party. When the Munich putsch failed in September 1923, they learnt that they would have to try to gain power by lawful means. They used propaganda to gain support and also came up with a 25-point program that appealed to everyone. Germany tried to pay the reparations by printing more money but when that failed, ...
Churchill believed that people should know the truth about the extreme neglect and shortage of defenses. That they have been defeated without resistance or a war. The entire balance of Europe entered a state of disorder. Churchill tells the people of his nation ?do not suppose that this is the end. This is only the beginning of the reckoning…unless by a supreme recovery of moral health and moral health and martial vigor, we arise again and take our stand for freedom as in olden time (376).
Churchill believed that the annexation of Czechoslavakia by Germany was just the beginning of what was going to happen to the rest of Europe as a Chamberlain and Churchill?s opinions conflicted greatly. Each had very supportive reasons for their beliefs, and did what they felt necessary at this very confusing and threatening point in time.
