Women Deserve Equal Pay for Equal Work Women deserve equal pay for equal work. It is no longer valid to justify unequal pay for equal work in the workforces by giving men the superior status of being the heads of the house hold. Clearly, gender roles have shifted and more women are now the heads of the households and the sole breadwinners in many homes. Families that depend on these women are greatly affected by unequal payment. Poverty is common in families that rely on women and these families are also likely to rely on the government for assistance.
The government has reacted to this issue by passing several bills and acts prohibiting unequal payment for equal work. These legal redundancies have made some progress, but the traditional mindsets that men are superior still lurk in our society, especially in the work forces and within the government itself. Authorities now justify women’s oppression in the work forces by focusing on their sexuality. Women are considered “marked” because every single thing that a woman does, values or wears is put into question when it comes to the justice system.
This has proved to be the main reason why women seldom report cases of unequal pay in the workforces. This is to say, even though the government is “trying” to give women their legal rights, it is also making it impossible for women to practice their legal rights. Citation: Nilsen, Alleen Pace. Sexism in English: Embodiment and Language. n. p, n. d. Print. 19 October 2012. Summary: Nilsen’s article focuses on the English language influences on sexism. The article specifically focuses on three issues that the English language has influenced in our society.
The Essay on Are Women Equal
Women have been put under men and have had this image of being homeward bound, raising the kids, and cleaning the house. Men have always been the strong figures, who make all the decisions and that go to work and expect supper to be on the table when they get home. Our society still is this way in most cases because that just is simply one of the traditions of the old life that we still stick to. ...
Nilsen mentioned the fact that eponym words that have come from a woman’s name found in English values women for their attractiveness and sexiness of their body, while men’s eponyms value their physical strength and accomplishment. (pg. 105).
The other issues focuses on how English grammar shows that women are expected to play a weak role while men plan a strong role. Finally, Nilsen talked about the negative connotations English words bring in women, and the positive connotations on men, which has led men into receiving a higher pay by giving them a fancy title for the same job a woman does.
Annotation: Nilsen’s article is very credible because she is a professor of English education at Arizona State University and an author of several books in the area of literature for young adults. Nilsen used the English dictionary as her main source of research and as clear evidence that supports her arguments about English being a language our ancestors used that is now an oppressing language towards women. This also gives a brief history of women’s oppression. Her strongest argument was about English words giving women a negative connotation while giving men a positive connotation.
She mentioned that “when men are doing jobs that women often do, we apparently try to pay them extra by giving them fancy titles” (pg. 113).
This is one of the ways in which work forces justify their unequal pay for women without having to deal with the justice system. Citation: Tannen, Deborah. Marked women, Unmarked men. The New York Time Magazine. 14 January, 1994. Print. Summary: Tannen’s article describes women as “marked” because everything a woman does, wears, values, or says tells something about her. According to her article, the term “marked” refers to a derogatory form of a base word.
Women’s being the marked gender makes them inferior to men because gender markers only focuses on women’s sexuality while it focuses on men superiority over women since men are considered the base gender in the society. Tannnen’s article also focused on other common things other than clothing’s that also make women the marked gender. Forms that women fill out in work places tell stories about them, which open the doors to work place oppression. Annotation: The fact that Tannen is a professor of linguistics with different works on the different controversial styles of men and women makes her article very credible.
The Term Paper on Men Are From Mars Women Are From Venus Gender Differences In Communication
Men are From Mars, Women are from venus, gender differences in communication "MEN ARE FROM MARS, WOMEN ARE FROM VENUS: GENDER DIFFERENCES IN COMMUNICATION" Men and women typically use different discourse strategies in communication, and, in general, women's linguistic behavior is disadvantageous compared to men's. This paper will attempt to demonstrate this fact, through the many stereotypes ...
Her main issue of “marked women” is the most useful for my argument. It focuses on the fact that women are considered inferior to men, who are considered the base gender. Tannen’s goal in this article was to make it known that women are oppressed by society’s judgments on everything the female gender does. This gender marker plays a major role in today’s society, especially in the workforces. Tannen’s article supports my argument that traditional thinking that men are superior to women is the main cause of unequal pay for equal work.
