AndrocentrismWhen I started to think about what to write for this paper I wanted to learn more about. Well, I guess I know what it means, but I wanted to see what it means to other people. In Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary 2 nd Edition the definition for is centered on emphasizing, or dominated by males or masculine interests. Then I went online and mostly the same definition. The only definition that I found that said anything about women was at web. com.
It read: centered or focused on men, often to the neglect or exclusion of women. I started to wonder what religious dictionary’s thought of. So I looked up some religious dictionaries. After about 10 of them I gave up because I came empty handed. It’s like they didn’t believe it existed. But, to my surprise I did find a definition to androgyny in a few of them.
And let’s not forget my personal definition: Men are better than women. Although I do not think this is true, that is just how I see. Now I am going to talk about the levels of that make the study of religions difficult. I am going to refer a lot to the book Feminism and Religion by Rita M.
Gross. The first level of andr centrism is the history. “As in the study of contemporary religions, many conventional historians are most interested in those who wielded power, which means that not only women, but other dis empowered groups have been left out of many historical records.” (Page 72) Basically this is saying that historians choose to keep men’s story because they held the power in history. I know that it may have seemed that men held the power, but they didn’t get there by them selves.
... 8217;s word, as men do, but are still denied many options. Women are deeply impacted by religion because it seems as though ... Bible, that many believe people have oppressed women in religion from the beginning. Women in religion has been a very controversial topic throughout ... problem with other people’s religions, or lack there of. Religion in itself has the power to shape a person unlike any ...
Behind every good man stands a greater woman. For some unknown reason women were under looked. I think that this is very sad. Gross’s book also stated that “Women function as mythic and symbolic models for the men’s sacred ceremonies; they also have an extensive religious life of their own, from which men are rigidly excluded.” (Page 66) This led me to think that men were almost jealous of women.
This wouldn’t surprise me. The second level is that when women’s stories are kept, they are not often told. I think that this all depends on who is telling you about religion. If you are listening to a feminist, she would most likely tell you about women in past religions. She obviously had to dig harder to find these stories.
Now if a man was telling you about pass religions he would talk about the all and powerful man, like women didn’t even exist. The third level of is “when contemporary academic scholars study the history of a religious tradition, they usually focus on what the tradition itself emphasized – the records of its male heroes.” (Page 72) I think that historians just concentrated on the more popular stories of religion. The more popular stories or the stories that were told the most were about men. I think that this is because men were the ones tell the story in the first place, and they weren’t about to talk about women. Men did all the heroic things, unlike women who couldn’t do heroic things or were not aloud to do them. Even if and when they did I’m sure it was never talked about.
Men wouldn’t want women showing them up now would they? The last and final level of is that many religions today are still very and patriarchal in social and institutional form. I think that has gone on for so long that people don’t want to or know how to change it. Especially in religion. The only way to change things is to keep working on it. Keep researching about women in history and keep spreading the word about women’s work. After listening in this class I often wonder if I would have paid more attention in church if more of the stories would have been about women.
... ). Almost all of her poems and short stories deal with the relationship between men and women and the effect that the Jazz Age ... took it for granted that the liking of many men was a desirable thing. Popularity seemed to her to be worth all ... (Acocell 78). But the critics imply that Parker was all talk when it came to death, because she did not die ...
It’s something that I am really starting to think about.