Wright’s ‘Native Son’: Capitalist or Communism? Was Richard Wright’s Native Son a story about his views towards Capitalism and Communism? Did Richard Wright want to show the good and bad points towards Capitalism and Communism? Or was this novel just about how a young man went through life and how society made him. Richard Wright’s Native Son shows that he used the Dalton’s, Thomas’s, and Jan Erlone to represent Capitalism and Communism. After reading Richard Wright’s Native Son, many believe the author purposely placed the Thomas family in a small, run-down home. The book shows this right from the start. Bigger and his family had to sleep in the same room, and big rats were running around the house. This shows the Thomas family represented the lower class, a trademark of Capitalism.
I could not even imagine living there, especially with that huge rat. The house must have been very dirty and disgusting by today’s standards. The author wanted to show how some families live under these severe conditions. He made us see vividly how they lived with this quote. ‘A huge black rat squealed and leaped at Bigger’s trouser-leg and snagged it in his teeth, hanging on.’ This showed how broke they were by showing that there were giant rats living with them and how it had no fear of them. Richard Wright did not just not just want to show the con sides to Capitalism, he also wanted to prove the Capitalism has its good sides to it also.
The Essay on Sympathy In Wrights Native Son
In Native Son, Richard Wright introduces Bigger Thomas, a liar and a thief. Wright evokes sympathy for this man despite the fact that he commits two murders. Through the reactions of others to his actions and through his own reactions to what he has done, the author creates compassion in the reader towards Bigger to help convey the desperate state of Black Americans in the 1930's. The simplest ...
For instance, Richard Wright purposely placed the Dalton in a spectacular house and made them very rich and famous. Another trademark of Capitalism, the upper class. The author showed how some of the Capitalist folks lived. Theupper class is very wealthy and basically gets what they want. Mr. and Mrs.
Dalton had it made. They had chauffeurs, a huge house, and cars. They had too much money. They were giving away things to the needy, though they were giving away useless things to the needy like Ping-Pong tables.
Richard Wright wanted to show that the upper class were afraid of the blacks. Not afraid of their individual physical strength, but afraid if they gained too much power. Theupper class had the power and they did not want anything or anyone to take some of it away. The author also wanted to prove another point here also. How the rich take advantage of the poor.
Mr. Dalton was in the real estate business. He sold overpriced apartments in a bad area to the poor. Wright was trying to show that the rich were getting richer, by rent the blacks paid, and the poor were getting poorer, by paying the rent.
On the Communist side, Richard Wright used Jan Erlone to show some aspects about Communism. A good example of this is when Jan first meets him and tries to make him feel like he was equal to him. The trademark of Communism, equality. Like in this quote ‘Jan smiled broadly, then extended his an open palm toward him.’ He wanted to show that Communist try to make everyone equal. Jan did not want there to be a black-white relationship.
He wanted Bigger to feel like he was Jan’s equal. Mr. Wright was not trying to condone nor condemn Capitalist or Communist. He was just showing what he saw through his eyes of the two types of government.
