Cosmetic testing is done on millions of animals every year. The formal definition of animal testing is the “use of animals in experiments and development projects usually to determine toxicity, dosing and efficacy of test drugs before proceeding to human clinical trials.” The correct term when talking about animal testing is vivisection. The Food and Drug Administration does not require that cosmetic products be tested on animals, but companies do it anyway. Companies lie about their reasons for testing animals, which leads to the killing of more animals each year. Their reasoning for this is to keep consumers safe. There are many other non-animal testing methods that could be used to test these products, and many companies have already starting using them. Some of these companies include The Body Shop and Avon Products, Inc. The controversy on whether or not animal testing should be banned has been a very large debate for so long.
Products ranging from eye shadow and soap to furniture polish and oven cleaner are tested on animals such as rabbits, rats, guinea pigs, and dogs, even though these test results do not help prevent or treat human illness or injury. In most testing, a liquid or powdered substance is usually dropped into the eyes of a group of rabbits. The rabbits are usually placed in stocks where only their heads are sticking out. Anesthesia is not given to them during these tests in which they are uncomfortable and unable to sleep. Their eyelids are held open with clips, and the substance that is being tested is put into their eyes. One procedures company’s still use is the Draize test, which is used to analyze the irritation and corrosion of the eye and skin. In this test, rabbits are locked into the stocks so they are unable to move around while the substance is either dripped into their eyes or rubbed onto their skin. These tests can last anywhere from 7 to 18 days, and they often cause blindness, inflamed skin, ulcers, bleeding, and deterioration. Only 9% of the products tested on animals make it to the market. We cannot rationalize the taking of the lives of so many animals that could otherwise live as pets in a caring home.
The Term Paper on Animal Test Animals Tests Testing
... has not animal tested any products for three years, and Colgate, which in February 1999 announced a moratorium on animal testing that extends ... competitor s product. Other companies, including Colgate, Amway, Gillette, and Tom s of Maine, have developed non-animal test methods to ... of moral concern (Rollin, 11). Therefore, animals in the eyes of supporters of animal testing were put on this planet for ...
Manufacturers decide which method they will use to test their products. Many companies use animals to test their products on because it helps protect them from any lawsuits consumers may file. They would defend themselves by saying the products were first tested on animals before they were put on the market. Most companies also test on animals because it is the cheapest method of testing.
One group against animal testing is the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).
Their main claim is summed up as “Animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, or use for entertainment” (PETA).
PETA claims animals used in experiments are free roaming animals, like frogs, birds, pigs and sheep, and are used because the public will view them with less compassion for being less cute. PETA believes if we educate the public, this will help in improving health and saving helpless animals.
Denying claims of physicians who are in favor of animal testing, Dr. Charles Mayor states: “ I abhor vivisection. It should at least be curbed. Better, it should be abolished. I know of no achievement through vivisection, no scientific discovery that could not have been obtained without such barbarism and cruelty. The whole thing is evil. (PETA)”
There are actually many new, inexpensive, and reliable alternatives for testing products. Companies have started using procedures such as cell and skin tissue cultures and corneas from the eye banks. There are many laws that attempt to ensure safety of animals. These laws are the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) and the Humane Slaughter Act. These laws help to regulate practices involving animal research, animals in exhibition and entertainment, animal breeding and transport and slaughter of most livestock. These laws are a small form of protection and are not always followed. The AWA sets standards for the humane housing, handling and transportation by those persons and entities covered. There are also regulations to ensure that the pain and distress of animals is minimized, and that researchers consider alternatives to animal use. Nevertheless, animals can still lawfully be used in experimental procedures without any anesthesia or pain relief, if this is a component of the research conducted.
The Essay on Speech Animal Testing
INTRODUCTION Did you know that in 2008 in New Zealand there were more than 341,000 animals used for research, testing and teaching? Animals are being used from all over the world for animal testing that ranges from drugs to our simple everyday shampoo. Almost every medicine, or treatment you have ever used has been tested on innocent animals for your benefit. WHAT HAPPENS TO ANIMALS IN ANIMAL ...
If people stopped buying the products, companies would be forced to find alternative methods of testing. If companies were fined a huge sum of money because they broke the law, they would most likely discontinue the practice.
Animal testing is a cruel and unnecessary method of testing new products. Animals are actually tortured or subject to inhumane and extremely painful conditions during the testing process and, afterwards, many times they are unnecessarily put to death. Alternatives for testing these products, such as sophisticated computer and mathematical models, have become popular with animal friendly corporations, and we should fight to ensure that they are used. Most consumers do not even bother to look for the label that says, “This product is not tested on animals.” Most of the time this is not completely true anyway, but people would think differently about buying certain products, especially if they are aware that their purchase has caused torment to an innocent animal. The first step in changing the testing practices of companies is to educate the consumer, the next step is to boycott companies, and the last step is to band together to get laws passed to eliminate animal testing everywhere.
Testing on animals has helped to create vaccines for some diseases that could cause death. Some of these diseases include Herpes Simplex, Hepatitis B, Polio, rabies, malaria, mumps and viruses. Animal testing has also helped in improving procedures such as measuring the blood pressure, pacemakers. Some other things perfected after being tested on animals is anesthesia, insulin, and many antibiotics.
Animal Testing Research Paper
... This might include testing makeup, lotions, or food products. Animal testing main support is from those people that believe the animals in our ... are many names, animal testing, animal experimentation or animal research, it all refers to the experimentation carried out on animals. Its main purpose ... that we can figure out which drugs help which diseases, as well as observe how certain drugs affect ...
HIV/AIDS is a disease that causes the immune system to fail and is usually fatal. There is still no cure for this disease, but there are many treatments. Animals play a big role in testing different vaccines before they are given to humans.
Humans are actually not the only ones who have benefited from animal testing. Scientists have used animals to help improve the health care of farm animals, household pets, wild species and even endangered species. They have created many vaccines, which help to treat rabies, distemper, and tetanus. These are usually illnesses found in domesticated animals. One huge Cats now have a treatment for Feline Leukemia.
The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) finds animal testing necessary to medical knowledge and advancement. The NIEHS feels that their research has helped to keep thousands of people alive today. They feel that their research done on animals has helped doctors to discover other methods in curing diseases through new medicines and surgeries. The NIEHS finds animal testing beneficial to the advances in mankind.
The Medical Research Council (MRC) has tried to create something to please both people for and against animal testing. They have comes up with a plan known as the 3Rs. They plan to replace, refine, and reduce animal testing and figure out other methods of research. MRC feels they please both sides by “the replacement of animals with humane alternatives wherever possible, reduction in the number of animals used, and refinement of husbandry and procedures to minimize any pain and suffering the animals may experience and to improve animal welfare.
The MRC claims this will become the future for animal testing as it aims to please in humane ways. There are a number of weaknesses among articles against animal testing all have. Attacking organizations such as March of Dimes allows PETA to appear ignorant in benefiting human kind. A weaker argument is assuming the public will have less compassion towards animals that are not house pets. Strengths argued in both articles against animal testing are the inhumane practices scientists perform on the animals; whether for medical advancements or testing cosmetics, and systems of animals and humans are not directly related; causing just as many deaths from these differences. I find these sources mostly reliable because they are organizations commonly known and should therefore be accurate yet I suggest those attacking animal research better inform the public on accurate and justifiable information so they do not lose support as they do when attacking such profound organizations as March of Dimes.
The Essay on Animal Testing Research Achor Animals
For Animal Testing Animal Testing For centuries, animals have been used in medical research. Since 1875, animal experimentation has been an on going heated debate on whether experiments on animals are ethical. At the very start, the movement against animal testing focused mainly on the "inhumanity of hurting and killing living beings for experimental discovery' (Achor 95). However, in these few ...
