Darwin had proved that all breeds of life have derived from a common ancestor. The modern differences however to these breeds are the product of the influences brought by their changing environments. This concept largely applies to the differences in the societies belonging to the Chesapeake and New England regions. These settlements, although originated from a common area, had by 1700 grown into two dissimilar societies, each with their own distinct features. Their unique environments filled with their own ideas for government, views on religion, economy, and structure for social life produced a grand difference in the development of the regions. Although they both derived of an English origin, they each underwent a unique metamorphosis which spawned a new life.
The majority of people arriving in the new world were of English origin during the 1600s, of course not all of these people were leaving England for the same reason. The list of emigrants bound for New England in March of 1635 displayed a large account of families. (Document B) Families were brought over in hope of starting a new life, one in which they would never return to England, otherwise they would have never bothered with the burden of such a life changing event. The idea of starting a new life of religious salvation in this region, ultimately creating the “prefect society†fueled the emigrants passion for arriving in New England, however, emigrants bound for Virginia did not hold the same morality. These soon to be residents of the Chesapeake region were embarked in the Merchant’s Hope. (Document C) They did not wish to begin a new life in a pure religious society, these individuals were searching for gold, silver, and whatever would entitle them to financial prosperity.
The Essay on Schools Should Prepare Children For Life In Society
Schools Should Prepare Children For Life in Society In today's information society people often think that characters from TV-shows or talks how guests reflect our society. Although that opinion is rather based on the disability of people to use information than on any logical thoughts, there is something every talks how reminds us of: people are not perfect. So, I say, society can not be perfect ...
The society of the New Englanders was based on a large concept of unity. This unity was acquired from the similar outlook upon religion by the inhabitants. People in New England followed the golden rule of Christianity of treating others as you would like to be treated. This morality lead people to bond together in times of need, to show patience, sincerity, and liberality to their neighbors. (Document A) It was of high importance in New England to make sure everyone was entitled to their fair share, as was seen just. Massachusetts in 1636 stated in the Articles of Agreement that “everyone shall have a share of the meadow or planting ground†(Document D).
Not entitling people to a proportion of land would be unchristian because taking land away, or never giving it in the first place, is not something a person would wish to be brought upon them. By denying this incentive it would be in such a sense denying the faith because it goes against the principle foundation in the religion. In New England though for having been able to create a union of people through God in which everyone helped each other, the society functioned for the best interest in the welfare of the community. Due to this, the community was now able to prosper and grow to a higher potential. The society of Virginia in comparison did not follow this golden rule of God.
The selfishness of the inhabitants of the Chesapeake area was due to their infatuation with wealth. They did not care for the welfare of their neighbors, unless they would ultimately gain financially from it. Upon departing from their ship, a group of settlers in 1624 were greatly overcharged for the necessary provisions they required to survive. Their commanders also did not provide these settlers with a substantial amount of food and drink in order to survive the harsh winter. The end result of this greed was the death of more then half the passengers. (Document F) Had the ship holders followed the morality of the Christian life as was done in New England, the provisions would have been shared with one another equally because that is what the golden rule would have entailed.
The Essay on Life In New England As Opposed To The Chesapeake Bay In The 1600s
During the 1600's, many people in the American colonies led very many different lives, some better than others. While life was hard for some groups, other colonists were healthy and happy. Two groups that display such a difference are the colonists of New England and Chesapeake Bay. New Englanders enjoyed a much higher standard of living. This high standard of New England's was due to many ...
The terrain in these two alternate environments also impacted on their distinct differences. Since the soil in the New England region was poor, and unfertile other means of commerce where necessary. This society depended on exporting goods, and fishing in their prosperous waters. The work entailed for this labor did not require the use of many indentured servants. Many of these workers however could be found in the Chesapeake region. (Document H) The fertile land in this environment was ideal for the growth of the tobacco industry; this growth was in fact reliant on the labor of the indentured servants who were viewed as the cheapest form of labor. In New England, these servants were shown more respect in the structure of society since the jobs they were given weren’t so diminishing.
Both regions held people of English ancestry that had placed themselves into new sects upon colonization. In these sects they grew to portray their unique beliefs and lifestyles. The two societies of the New England and Chesapeake areas were so ultimately dissimilar, it is truly hard to believe that they had simply branched out from the same origin in the beginning.
