The purpose of this research paper is to persuade a National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) panel, to include its president Mr. Mark Emmert to modify the current NCAA amateurism by law 12. 02. 1 making it feasible for college athletes to receive financial compensation. The primary issue with the current regulation is that because of the rule many student athletes are living in poverty like conditions. The current by law is also affecting various aspects of domestic and International students ability to continue to meet eligibility requirements.
In the past ten years college athletics as a whole has grown exponentially and it’s clearly evident by the revenues the NCAA and it’s schools are generating. These additional revenues now make it feasible to compensate players at an acceptable level. There is no need for college players to continue to live in poverty like financial situations, which are also a cause for their intentions of leaving school early to seek financial security. Scholarly research, along with surveys and various news article s were used to compile evidence of the issues with the NCAA’s amateurism by laws utilized to determine an athlete’s eligibility.
The rogerian approach suited this topic well, because it was vital to examine the affects of both the current by law, as well as the proposed modification to it, and the affects it could have on both the NCAA and the student athletes. If changes to the current by law are not brokered, student athletes will continue have issues with eligibility, as well as continuing to suffer from impoverished financial situations. The question regarding whether or not college athletes should have the ability to receive financial compensation is one that has been an ongoing over the past decade.
The Term Paper on Football Team Ncaa College Athletes
The NCAA: Out of Control Darnell Autry was a member of the Northwestern University Wildcats football team. He was a dedicated student and an All American running back. He was also a theatre major. So when he was offered a small part in a motion picture he quickly accepted. It was a non-paying role and he paid for his own plane ticket to Rome, where the movie was being filmed. However the National ...
It is imperative that the president of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), Mr. Mark Emmert, reexamines this topic. Though the debate regarding the financial compensation of student athletes has continued, college athletics in that span of time has grown into a mainstream sport within the United States. There are many individuals who adamantly oppose the additional compensation of college athletes, such as yourself, and understandably so. There is also a large group of people who feel it is only just to ensure our college athletes receive adequate compensation for what they are providing, not only to their respective schools, but also to college athletics as a whole. The NCAA instituted the NCAA Bylaw 12. 02. 1 which states “student athletes must remain armatures in an intercollegiate sport and their participations should be primarily motivated by education and by physical, mental, and social benefits to be derived” (GoZags. com).
It is clear that as the NCAA as an organization emphasizes the preservation of amateurism in order to keep college athletics from becoming just another professional sport.
When analyzing this debate from a moral aspect, it is clear that the NCAA does provide an opportunity for many young adults that would otherwise not be afforded to them due to many of their upbringings within homes that have financial difficulties. The NCAA and its institutions of higher learning have provided a means for many underprivileged young adults to receive not only top level educations at their institutions but an avenue to expand their horizons.
When we look at what is provided to these student athletes it’s clear that an education and personnel growth are at the top of this list. There are varying points of views regarding the aspects of college athletes and what is considered compensation, it is clear that some level of compensation is provided, even if that is solely the opportunity to itself. As per the NCAA and the data it collected back in “2003-2004, there were over 138,000 division one and division two scholarships furnished with an average value of $10,400 per scholarship, per year” (New York Times).
The Essay on Summary of the article: “Do college Sports Affect Students Grades A Defense of the NCAA”
“Do college Sports Affect Students Grades? A Defense of the NCAA” by Megan Greenwell argues about whether college sports affect grades of the student-athletes or regular students and whether colleges would be better off without collegiate sport. Megan Greenwell in her article expresses her opinion on the following topic and gives some arguments in favor of having collegiate sports. In this article ...
When adding those numbers, it is feasible to argue that a four year college athlete receives over $40,000 throughout their journey to graduate or even become a professional athlete when in many cases these young adults would not be afforded the opportunity to attend a college much less complete a college degree allowing them to better themselves and their futures. Those that argue that college students are not receiving fair treatment would argue the point that these amateur college athletes are not truly as fortunate as the NCAA portrays.
There is no doubt that many underprivileged young adults are indeed provided an opportunity to pursue a lifelong dream, yet it’s not as obvious when some of the statistics are examined. Though the NCAA and it’s institutions of higher learning do issue hundreds of thousands of scholarships throughout the year, they only make up a minuet percentage of college students, in fact in the same in the same time period of 2003 to 2004, “the N. C. A. A. institutions gave athletic scholarships amounting to about 2 percent of the 6. 4 million athletes playing those sports, making that select group of athletes barely register statistically among the 5. 3 million students at N. C. A. A. colleges and universities” (New York Times, n. d. ).
If the intent is to provide more opportunities to these underprivileged young adults then we all have a moral obligation to review not only how scholarships are awarded, but how many, as well as how they benefit the student athletes throughout their college years.
The second aspect of the debate is one from an economic perspective, which is the primary focus on both sides of the argument. The NCAA does not make any concessions regarding the revenues that college athletics have seen steady increases in the past ten to twenty years. The major source of these revenues has come from television contracts from major networks. These contracts, along with other revenue streams seem to provide a false sense as to what is truly happening with the money schools are claiming as revenues.
The Essay on Alcohol And Athletes College Athlete
College athletes and their drinking habits is a big deal to a lot of different people. These athletes are looked up to by so many, that most people think them drinking during their sports season is wrong. People have many questions about this issue. Are athletes coaches aware of their players drinking and how often they " re doing it? Do athletes drink more often than non-athletes? Did these ...
An example of this misconception is “The University of Florida’s athletic budget for 2000-2001 was $44 million, but by the time expenses are paid out, the athletic association expects a surplus of $400,000. Most of that went to repaving the track” (Hayes, 2001).
Much of the money produced by college athletics is reallocated to other facets of the school, which benefit the college athletes and other students alike. Yearly maintenance, as well as improved or new facilities is always a factor into what the school can provide its current and future students.
It is evident that college athletics have become a major source of revenue generation in the past twenty years. The NCAA claims that revenues produced are spread throughout many schools, some of which are not as big or play a prominent role, and that the majority of schools use these funds for improvements. If that were the case, why not look at the salaries that are paid to top-notch college coaches, in many cases exceeding $1 million dollars a year. Those salaries along with the television contracts, such as the one signed in “2011 between the NCAA, worth $10. 8 billion for the exclusive broadcast rights of college athletics, which would generate an estimated $770 million in annual revenue for the NCAA” (Karcher, 2012), provide a stark contrast from the poverty like financial state of the student athlete. Though these revenues continue to grow, college athletes are currently living at or below the poverty lines due to their training and travel schedules making it nearly impossible for them to generate their own additional income thru opportunities like a part time job, something the average college student is able to do.
There is a large disparity in the finical status of the NCAA’s institutions of higher learning and that of the college athletes that play a major role in producing those revenues. The need for change is something that is clear and though NCAA has taken a firm stance against financial compensation, it is largely because making a change would conflict with the organizations amateurism requirements. The NCAA and it’s president believe that the rules and regulations they have instituted, are the most appropriate for the both the student athletes and college athletics as a whole.
The Term Paper on Stress In College Students
College students all stress out about one situation/life generality or another. Some of these situations/life generalities are individuation, computer anxiety, ethnic and gender roles in student-athletes, and mathematics anxiety. There have been many studies looking at stress in college students. At one time or another, college students are forced to deal with a stressful situation. Stress, in ...
Yet it is evident that too many student athletes are living at or below what is considered the poverty line, which is why we must come together to address a resolution sooner rather than later. The NCAA wants to ensure that college athletes remain amateurs; therefore it is imperative that a compromise to the NCAA’s current definition of an amateur is made in determining player’s eligibility. The definition of an amateur originated in England and was used to determine a person’s eligibility based on their social class.
In modern day America, amateurism is predicated on whether or not the athlete is compensated for playing with money. In other words “If you are paid to participate in athletics, you are considered a professional; only those who participate for “free” maintain their amateur status” (Abbey-Pinegar, 2010).
The new standard definition for college eligibility needs to account for other countries, which currently have their own standards, which in many cases conflict with the NCAA’s current by laws and have hindered international student athletes from accepting opportunities to study and play within the United States.
One proposal for adjusting the current definition is to remove the aspect of financial compensation or restrict the amount that can be received. The financial compensation does not necessarily affect the level of competition, however it should continue to require athletes to have never competed at a pro level within his or her current sport. This would allow some compensation by various means, such as endorsements, or memorabilia sales without affecting the college athletics product on the field. One primary concern is the possibility of having an influx of international professional athletes that compete internationally, and then attempt to come to the US to take advantage of true amateurs competitors at the college level. This concern is valid; therefore by clearly addressing the prohibition of professional competition within the amended rules and regulations, the new standard would offer added flexibility without placing college athletes at a disadvantage. The NCAA is an agency that oversees college athletics, which in essence is their product or brand, which it tries to grow, not only in the US but also throughout the world.
The Term Paper on Online Communities Students Community College
I. Introduction York university in Canada once created a web site called York University Student Center Online. This web site concern about the student activities on campus and outside. First lunched in 2001, the aim of York's website is entertainment and media publication. It has a good reputation among other Canadian universities' websites. The web site archives many of the student activities ...
By establishing a new amateurism standard, which would allow players to receive certain financial compensation, it could draw more foreign athletes from all over the world, enticing them to come play in the United States instead of moving to a semi-pro or professional level sports league within their countries. This would in essence facilitate the growth of US college athletics around the world, something the NCAA and institutions of higher learning would benefit from by increasing its exposure to a worldwide audience.
This could have a direct effect on various avenues of revenue, but the largest impact could come in the form of merchandising. Various other sports have recognized potential revenue’s from expanding their sports at an international level. The National Basketball Association (NBA) and the National Football League (NFL) are two major sports, which continue to attempt to expand their fan basis into Europe. The NFL provides the best evidence of this growth, as it has become the most valuable sports league in the world.
There are fan bases that can be developed by adding more foreign players; therefore modifying the current definition of amateurism for the benefit of the college athletics brand would make financial sense. This new amateurism standard would favor both domestic student athletes and international student athletes. The NCAA’s redefinition of an amateur as someone who has not competed at any professional level would give international student athletes a standard, which would be more in line with their home countries rules and regulations.
In many cases it is a normal practice for institutions of higher learning in other countries to provide various forms of compensation for participating in amateur completion. For instance in Europe, “some international student-athletes are given stipends, receive free gear, and obtain prize money for competition, all of which jeopardize a student-athlete’s amateur status in the United States” (Abbey-Pinegar, 2010).
The Essay on International Sports
A polo match lasts about one and one-half hours and is divided into six 7 minute periods or chukkers. Since a horse in fast polo can cover two and one-half to three miles per period, he'll be too tired to play a second one right away. After resting for two or three periods, some horses can return to the game. Still, in championship polo, a player will come to the field with at least six horses. ...
The new rule would not penalize these types of international student athletes due to the standards of their home countries, providing them a greater chance of keeping their eligibility to join a US college sports team.
However the new rule would still require these international students to remain amateur by prohibiting them to have competed within their sport at any professional level, considering that “the current rules often place domestic athletes at a competitive disadvantage as international student athletes are able to amass talent and increase skill level from playing on a professional circuit, only to come to the United States and be able to reign over domestic student-athletes who have much more limited experience.
