Cyber bullying is a kind of bullying which happens via the Internet through emails, social networking forums, chat rooms, instant messaging, and discussion groups. Cyber bullying can also occur via the use of SMS or MMS cellphone forums. Teasing, spreading rumors or scandals online, forwarding unsolicited messages, slander and threats sent online or on cellphones are all forms of cyber bullying. It is these acts of cyber bullying that are discussed in cyber bullying essays. Cyber bullying essays can be written as research papers or term papers, descriptive essays, expository essays etc.
An attention-grabbing way to begin cyber bullying essays is by providing statistics on the number of cyber bullying cases reported, the typical victim of cyber bullying, and the fastest growing type of cyber bullying such as stealing an individual’s name and password to a social networking site. You can then proceed with your cyber bullying essay by discussing the effects of cyber bullying on the victim. Some of the common effects are lowered self-esteem, anger and other negative emotional feelings that are damaging to an individual’s emotional health and well-being. Cyber bullying includes stealing a person’s username and password and using his/her profile to post destructive information. It also includes editing photos in a way that embarrasses the individual in the photo and recording online conversations without the consent of the person being recorded. Cyber bullying essays should also include a discussion on what should be done in case you are a victim of cyber bullying e.g., reporting threats to authorities immediately and not replying to messages from cyber bullies.
The Coursework on Explore the Ways in Which Bullies and Victims Are Present in Lord of the Flies and Dna
English coursework, James Luxton Explore the ways in which bullies and victims are presented in Lord of the Flies and DNA. Bullies and Victims play vital roles in both the novel and the play. The authors, Golding and Kelly, both put their characters through similar trials. In Lord of the Flies, Golding’s characters turn from normal school boys, to savages who are prepared to kill one another to ...
Describing an actual case of cyber bullying and the outcome of the incident is also important information to include in cyber bullying essays. Lastly, cyber bullying essays should explain what parents can do to educate their children about the steps they should take in case they are victims of cyber bullying.
The advantages and benefits of the Internet are well-known and undisputed but it is important to point out the dangers of this medium as well. Cyber bullying essays can help do just that. Important research on this cyber bullying can be found by visiting the Essay411 site and by reading examples of cyber bullying essays.
Bullying: A child’s nightmare
My article was about bullying and how kids learn to deal with it. Every day thousands of teens wake up afraid to go to school. Bullying is a problem that affects millions of students, and it has everyone worried, not just the kids on its receiving end. Yet because parents, teachers, and other adults don’t always see it, they may not understand how extreme bullying can get. Getting into detail about why kids are bullied and even why kids bully other kids is a pivotal standpoint in figuring out how to prevent it.
What is Bullying?
Bullying is when a person is picked on over and over again by an individual or group with more power, either in terms of physical strength or social standing. Two of the main reasons people are bullied are because of appearance and social status. Bullies pick on the people they think don’t fit in, maybe because of how they look, how they act (for example, kids who are shy and withdrawn), their race or religion, or because the bullies think their target may be gay or lesbian. Some bullies attack their targets physically, which can mean anything from shoving or tripping to punching or hitting, or even sexual assault. Others use psychological control or verbal insults to put themselves in charge. For example, people in popular groups or cliques often bully people they categorize as different by excluding them or gossiping about them (psychological bullying).
Fashion Essay Kids School Baggy
It is quite evident as you walk around the streets of almost any city or town in America that the line between what was once considered the black style of dress and the white styles has become less and less evident. This is especially true with the younger kids in junior high and high school. The baggy pants and shirts with labels and bright colors that were once reserved for the inner city black ...
They may also taunt or tease their targets (verbal bullying).
Verbal bullying can also involve sending cruel instant or email messages or even posting insults about a person on a website — practices that are known as cyber bullying. All forms of bullying lead to psychological, emotional, as well as physical issues. So it is important to know how bullying affects your child. (kidshealth.org)
How bullying Affects You
One of the most painful aspects of bullying is that it is relentless. Most people can take one episode of teasing or name calling or being shunned at the mall. However, when it goes on and on, bullying can put a person in a state of constant fear. Guys and girls who are bullied may find their schoolwork and health suffering. Studies show that people who are abused by their peers are at risk for mental health problems, such as low self-esteem, stress, depression, or anxiety. They may also think about suicide more. Bullies are at risk for problems, too. Bullying is violence, and it often leads to more violent behavior as the bully grows up. It’s estimated that 1 out of 4 elementary-school bullies will have a criminal record by the time they are 30. Some teen bullies end up being rejected by their peers and lose friendships as they grow older. Bullies may also fail in school and not have the career or relationship success that other people enjoy. Researchers on stop bullying now’s website state that between 15-25% of U.S. students are bullied with some frequency, while 15-20% report they bully others with some frequency, and that young people who bully are more likely than those who don’t bully to skip school and drop out of school. They are also more likely to smoke, drink alcohol and get into fights. It scares kids so much that they skip school. As many as 160,000 students may stay home on any given day because they’re afraid of being bullied. Bullying not only affects the children being bullied, it also affects the bully as well. (www.stopbullyingnow.hrsa.gov)
How Bullying Affects the Bully
Bullies tend to be physically larger and stronger than their peers, impulsive, easily frustrated and physically aggressive. While many people believe bullies act tough in order to hide feelings of insecurity and self- loathing, in fact, bullies tend to be confident, with high self-esteem. They are generally physically aggressive, with pro- violence attitudes, and are typically hot-tempered, easily angered, and impulsive, with a low tolerance for frustration. Bullies have a strong need to dominate others and usually have little empathy for their targets. Male bullies are often physically bigger and stronger than their peers.14 Bullies tend to get in trouble more often, and to dislike and do more poorly in school than teens who do not bully others. They are also more likely to fight, drink, and smoke than their peers. Some teenagers not only bully others but are also the targets of bullies themselves. Like other bullies, they tend to do poorly in school and engage in a number of problem behaviors. Children who bully are more likely to get into fights, vandalize property, and drop out of school. They also tend to be socially isolated, with few friends and poor relationships with their classmates. Young bullies carry a one-in-four chance of having a criminal record by age 30. Bullies are usually unaware how severe picking on other kids can be and do not realize that they are creating a deep, lasting memory in their victims mind. (www.k12.wa.us)
The Essay on Condoms vs Abstinence for Public School Children
Rush Limbaugh’s article, “Condoms: The New Diploma,” berates the common practice of distributing condoms to school children. The iconic conservative talk show host, who is blessed with “talent on loan from God,” uses forceful, colloquial arguments and analogies to warn against the messages and possible dire consequences that public school condom distribution can impart on America’s children. He ...
Statistics on Children Who Have Been Bullied
The experience of being bullied can end up causing lasting damage to victims. This is both self-evident, and also supported by an increasing body of research. It is not necessary to be physically harmed in order to suffer lasting harm. What is far more difficult to mend is the primary wound that bullying victims suffer which is damage to their self-concepts; to their identities. Bullying is an attempt to instill fear and self-loathing. Being the repetitive target of bullying damages your ability to view yourself as a desirable, capable and effective individual. There is an outcome that stem from learning to view you as a less than desirable, incapable individual. The outcome is that it becomes more likely that you will become increasingly susceptible to becoming depressed and/or angry and/or bitter. Being bullied teaches you that you are undesirable, that you are not safe in the world, and (when it is dished out by forces that are physically superior to yourself) that you are relatively powerless to defend yourself. When you are forced, again and again, to contemplate your relative lack of control over the bullying process, you are being set up for Learned Helplessness (e.g., where you come to believe that you can’t do anything to change your ugly situation even if that isn’t true), which in turn sets you up for hopelessness and depression. The effects bullying victims may experience:
Why Do Kids Bully others Kids? – Essay
Sharon A. Harris Why Do Kids Bully others Kids? Composition II Instructor: Kristina Nelson October 29, 2011 Why children bully other kids? Some reason why other kids bully other kids is because they were trained to bully born bully, are they can’t manage anger and hurt, frustration, or other strong emotions. To me children that are aggressive are bullies. Either they have seen violence and ...
Short term:
Anger, depression, anxious avoidance of settings in which bullying may occur, greater incidence of illness, lower grades than non-bullied peers, suicidal thoughts and feelings.
Long Term:
Reduced occupational opportunities, lingering feelings of anger and bitterness, desire for revenge, difficulty trusting people, interpersonal difficulties, including fear and avoidance of new social situations, increased tendency to be a loner, and increased incidence of continued bullying and victimization. What is important is that the child is given advice to help prevent and possibly stop bullying.
How to Help Your Child
There is a list of ways to help your child deal with bullies and show them that they don’t have to just stand by and take it. The following tips can help prevent bullying:
* Ignore the bully and walk away. It’s definitely not a coward’s response — sometimes it can be harder than losing your temper. Bullies thrive on the reaction they get, and if you walk away, or ignore hurtful emails or instant messages, you’re telling the bully that you just don’t care. Sooner or later the bully will probably get bored with trying to bother you. Walk tall and hold your head high. Using this type of body language sends a message that you’re not vulnerable.
* Hold the anger. Who doesn’t want to get really upset with a bully? But that’s exactly the response he or she is trying to get. Bullies want to know they have control over your emotions. If you’re in a situation where you have to deal with a bully and you can’t walk away with poise, use humor — it can throw the bully off guard. Work out your anger in another way, such as through exercise or writing it down.
* Don’t get physical. However you choose to deal with a bully doesn’t use physical force (like kicking, hitting, or pushing).
The Essay on Explain the factors that would lead to suspicion of child maltreatment or abuse
Explain the factors that would lead to suspicion of child maltreatment or abuse. The different types of maltreatment is sexual abuse, Sexual abuse refers to any action that pressures or forces someone to do something sexually they don't want to do. Sexual abuse can be when you’re being touched in a way that you may not like, or being forced to have sex, another type of sexual abuse is when ...
Not only are you showing your anger, you can never be sure what the bully will do in response. You are more likely to be hurt and get in to trouble if you use violence against a bully. You can stand up for yourself in other ways, such as gaining control of the situation by walking away or by being assertive in your actions. Some adults believe that bullying is a part of growing up and that hitting back is the only way to tackle the problem. But that’s not the case. Aggressive responses tend to lead to more violence and more bullying for the victims.
* Practice confidence. Practice ways to respond to the bully verbally or through your behavior. Practice feeling good about yourself even if you have to fake it at first. (kidshealth.org)
I feel that most people hesitate to speak out because it can be hard. It takes confidence to stand up to a bully — especially if he or she is one of the established group leaders. Some kids are so deeply affected; it ultimately leads to them acting out violently. I do believe that the kids that are doing the bullying have been affected by some form of abuse or neglect at home. They are so young and do not realize that their issues at home are driving them to act in the same manner as their abuser. I was bullied as a child, and I feel that because my mother was involved in my life and we had an open relationship, it helped me to overcome the thoughts of feeling worthless and hopeless. That is what kids need in these situations. Someone to tell them that they are loveable and that they are worth fighting for. Bullying has been around for ages and some of the most horrific events have come about because of it. I hope that kids and parents will observe how terrible these situations are and think twice before they become an abuser of another person. Today, we need to be involved in our kids school lives, social lives and they need to have a healthy home life. Bullies are not just made out of thin air; somewhere they have seen an adult bullying another adult. Some parents do not watch what type of character they display in front of kids. Some parents don’t even pay attention to their kids at all. I feel that neglect is the number one reason that there are bullies and that there are kids that are targets. So in conclusion, if any person has a child that is being bullied, or has a child that is a bully, there parent must do all in their power to turn it around. Love and appreciation is the best policy for any lost, disturbed kid. So parents, step up to the plate and save our kids from senseless violence.
The Term Paper on Child Abuse Essay 3
Child Abuse is harm done to a child; this person causing the abuse can be either a child or an adult. Sadly, child abuse has been practiced in all cultures, and in all ethics throughout the world. In certain places child abuse started to be noticed and considered as one of the major problems in society. It is normally caused by stress or an economic problem, the average of child abuse is ...
References
Facts For Teens: Bullying, www.k12.wa.us
The Long Term Effects of Bullying, www.mentalhelp.net
Stop Bullying Now, www.stopbullyingnow.org
http://www.oppapers.com/essays/Papers/328845
Last week, Tyler Clementi, a university student, committed suicide after being outed online via webcam by his roommates. News reports and public outcry have been quick to circumscribe Clementi’s death according to competing narratives of “cyber bullying,” bullying in general, hate crimes, social justice, and just punishment. However, this article argues that the symbolic battle over Clementi’s death may be hampering our ability to analyze what kind of issues may be stake in this incident. This is especially true in respect to the use of the term “bully.”
Tyler Clementi’s suicide has been mobilized by many individuals who speak out against bigotry and bullying, and while news coverage of “bullying” is usually localized to the enclosures of the elementary and high schools, it seems that we, the news readers, have begun to see instances of bullying outside these usual spaces. In the workplace, the manifestations of sexism, racism, and classism are important issues and struggles, but our new taste for the discourse of “the bully” has replaced the sexist, racist, classist, and bigot. These various kinds of abuse can easily be abstracted into a notion of “bullying.”
So, how do we think about what has happened to Mr. Clementi? The media coverage, and its outcry, has become confused by what constitutes its dominant narrative: is it bigotry or is it bullying? The difference between these two is important.
What good does it do to call the bigot a bully? Not a lot. In fact it takes away a number of important tools to respond to the phenomenon. If we begin to think of the bigot as a bully, we turn a political/ideological issue into a general social issue; that is, we turn a legal/charter of rights problem into a “sensitivity” problem. In short, the bully in the workplace denies us the ability to respond to specific phenomenon of racism, sexism, classism, and bigotry.
We have becomes obsessed with the motif of fighting the schoolyard bully. Almost every film with a young character must overcome one. Yet, while bullies have always been an actual issue (in one way or another), calling something an instance of bullying can do more harm than good. We understand what the bully signifies: an unbalancing of force between individuals which is repeated and constantly reestablished. When we encounter bullying with children, we see it as a “senseless” and irrational disturbance to the lives of those we care for, often at those moments when we cannot help them. We understand the bully as being in the business of cruelty.
But we also understand that bullies are not created in vacuums. Social and economic conditions create the bully, and we, sometimes, try to empathize with them. But, mostly, we condemn and consign them to being part of the normal. Everyone deals with a bully at some point, we hear people say. Thus, the bully is so generalized or abstracted from the particular situation of bullying, that they fulfil the role of not only a social paradigm, but a social archetype. We think of the bully archetype in relation to children. The reason why may be in part because of the abstract way we understand child-to-child abuse. When an adult beats a child, or another adult, we do not call it bullying, we call it assault. In the UK there are only colloquial understandings of “bullying”, and no legal definition. We take the consequences of bullying very seriously, but we still understand the bully in a very overly-simplified way.
Bullying in the North America is also accepted as an oversimplified notion, and this is the problem when we extend these notion to the case of Mr. Clementi. We speak of “bullying” with children because we willingly disregard the very real conditions under which it takes place — it is our own “reading” of the abuse that renders the results, which appal us, “senseless.” The abuse itself is pregnant with meaning, yet because we are dealing with children, the very possibility of their encounter with such potent meanings shocks us or only exists as an impossibility. Thus, we tend to abstract it, and to render it general, make it a social cause, an unfortunate, appalling, but usual phenomena of the schoolyard. We think of bullying as senseless because once it is abstracted, once it loses the particulars of the event of abuse that makes it make sense, only the abusive behaviour remains, in a vaccuum: calling the kid fat, punching them in the face, making them eat a worm, calling them faggot or retarded, etc. Bullying seems senseless because we think of it as random, “mean,” and oversimplified, when we know that the social interactions and hierarchies between children are extremely complex.
However, these particular spaces where child bullying occurs are not formed in the same way as the workplace. Sexual, gender, racial, and classist abuse in the workplace, because it occurs between adults, is assumed to have much more malicious and intentional meanings because it mobilizes certain dominate ways of categorizing individuals which we assume does not occur in children. (We say that children are “sensitive” to this, but we often regard them as ignorant of the nuances.) The notion of workplace “bullying” infantilizes the individuals involved, and abstracts the abuse out of the contexts that make it “sexism,” “racism,” or “classism,” replacing these contexts with a bare senseless event. Actually, these abuses make a lot of sense when understood as bigotry or through sociological/cultural theory. The notion of workplace “bullying” thus removes the potential of turning the abuse into a political issue by making the abuse general, random, and “senseless.”
Thus, while it is extremely important that people like Ellen DeGeneres are “speaking out” on the behalf of victims of bullying (celebrities mobilize and popularize causes better than the rest of us), she does Mr. Clementi a disservice by calling what lead to his death “bullying,” and calling his death senseless. While I do realize that the word “senseless” is often used simply for effect, the rhetorical use often finds itself in sincere conversation and media commentary. Often our performative disgust at crime or tragic news overwhelms our ability to consider what we are seeing in the coverage and discussion.
Mr. Clementi’s role in this story constitutes a battlefield of meaning. Our universities in general are caught between two distinct environment of the school and the professional environment. Mr. Clementi occupies this in-between space, where the media isn’t sure how exactly to portray and articulate the specifics of his situation. The courts are looking for bias and hate crimes, which make this a political issue (bigotry); but there is also the discourse of the bully, which transforms the case into a generalized phenomena and a sociological issue that can’t be address by courts, only by mass shift in cultural values. But both of these arguments miss their target.
The conditions which lead up the Mr. Clementi’s death occurred in the university; a place where North Americans have been redefining what kind of person goes there. In Canada, especially at my former University in Ontario, students have becomes infantilized. Teachers now maintain care-giving responsibilities and parents have become increasingly involved with disputes at the school, whereas before this was a matter between young adults, or adults, and the school. Mr. Clementi was 18 and by most rights a man. Yet, with the increasingly infantilization of universities students, the discourse of bullying has leaked into the university. And that is what is wrong with the way we are thinking about this issue.
Are the accused bullies or are they bigots? This is the choice we, as readers, viewers, and listens, are given. We can choose between the adult-discourse of bigotry, or the infant-discourse of bullying. And, we have decided to believe both. This places readers in a bad spot as well. By holding these contradictory views, these two dominant narratives battle over the truth of the situation, and Clementi’s death remains “senseless.” But are there not other ways that the death of Mr. Clementi makes sense without assuming it must be either bigotry or bullying? Is there not also a sociological case to be made for stupidity on the part of the accused?
What do I mean by “stupidity”? There is a myth that most undergrads believe when they come to university, and it is taught to them by “college movies” like Old School and Animal House. Even though these are fictitious, the “moral” development of college students is a complex and divergent process. When I was in first year, I attended a frat party in which I observed and heard of some true stupidity (men running in to room where people are having sex, slapping their asses, snapping a photo).
I’ve also participated in some stupidity of my own (though nothing like the previous examples).
Everyone has tales of college stupidity which would shock and disgust others involving strange encounters with strippers, fights, benders, humiliation, humiliating, etc. In this age of the internet, this stupidity has a new medium over which to travel – each new medium brings new heroes, new villains, and new victims.
Forgive me for using some anecdotal evidence here: I recall a story from my undergrad of two students being filmed during sex from the fire escape. This video ended up online, and people saw it, but nothing came of it and the perpetrators went on to become business men or something. Anyway, this was an act of stupidity, and it made sense within those parameters (the frat-boy antics and transgressive freedom from your parents, etc).
This isn’t to say it is good or bad, but that it happens. The sociology of college stupidity is not an accuse for an individual’s behaviour but we must be careful to distinguish what happens in universities from what happens in high schools. In my story, those with the camera could have been arrested for breach of privacy (this is one of the possible charges facing the accused in the Clementi case), maybe even some form of harassment. Or, what if one of those individuals having sex on the video had taken their life? The stupidity of those with the camera would be understood in a completely different way. But we would not have called it bullying.
We know that experiences and events do not come to us already in a convenient newsbyte and there are a number of choices made by journalists as to how to tell the story so we will best understand the event. We must be wary not to let dominant narratives think for us when it comes to these experiences and events. So, of course, we need to think critically about the kind of stories we tell; they are our primary form of organizing the information from these events and making them make sense. If something occurs and it appears as senseless to us, we must ask whether the story we choose to tell is the right one. It is up to others to say when the narratives in use oversimplify or pre-cast the event. Public commentary on online news sites lets media institutions know when we suspect narrative a mistep on their part. Also, we should look to journalism and news blogs look at the media and fleshes out those missing details through analysis, commentary, or critique.
It is unacceptable that young gay men are taking their lives, but the onus is also on us to not infantilize their deaths by understanding it in terms like “bullying.” Folks want to blame the internet and bulling, yet Clementi was not a boy, and it has yet to be determined if bias was at play in what his roommates did. These deaths and the abuses are symptoms, not the illness. We need to recognize that homophobia is a real problem in North American, despite how many funny gay characters make us laugh on tv. These are serious problems and we adults must deal with them. Also, nowhere has anyone noted that suicide is now the dominate and public mode of release for these young men, nor has anyone noted that suicide has now become a newsworthy item, whereas before it was taboo. The CBC and most other Canadian media outlets tend not report on suicides.
Clementi’s death draws together speculations of abuse, homophobia, suicide, news coverage, university policy, and fears of social media. Yet, the media still haven’t mapped out which of these issues are really at work here and which are here because the dominate narratives imply their presence. This death is a complex situation, so let’s not confuse it with abstracted notions of bullying, and let’s also not be too quick to imply bias before we can prove it.
Some links to the coverage from the CBC and NYTimes:
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/10/03/rutgers-clementi-vigil.html
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/10/01/rutgers-clementi-suicide-online.html
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/09/30/washington-bridge-suicide030.html
http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch?query=clementi&srchst=cse
