Name:………………
Course:english
Instructor:………………
Date:…………………
Euthanasia
Different groups of persons have put several definitions of euthanasia forward according to their religious beliefs or their morals and beliefs. A standard definition of Euthanasia, terminating a person’s life due to pity in case he or she is suffering from a chronic disease, which has no cure or is difficult to pursue treatment due to different factors (Jackson 55).
The social acceptance of euthanasia has created many controversies in different groups of persons globally since, different people clung on to different beliefs, superstitions, and religious principles which support or condemn euthanasia (Manning 78).
Such controversies have made it difficult even in the legal acceptance of the act and many federals, especially those having a common national religion such as Islamic states are left at crossroads on whether to legalize it or not. This research paper identifies the major controversies surrounding euthanasia, the major factors that determine the views of people on euthanasia, types of euthanasia and methods of euthanasia.
A vital fact in euthanasia is that, the decision to die is by close members of the family on behalf of the victim, making some people describe euthanasia as murder (Tors 34).
The Essay on Euthanasia People Should Have The Right To Choose
Euthanasia: People Should Have the Right to Choose There are many sides to the dilemma of whether or not euthanasia should be carried out. There is the question of morality, the question of active versus passive euthanasia and the question of when euthanasia should be put into use. None of these questions are totally cut and dry. There seem to be more gray areas within this issue than there are ...
Several factors lead to persons committing euthanasia for their parents and siblings with the major one being, financial constraints. When patients from humble backgrounds suffer unremitting diseases such as cancer or heart defects that require expensive treatments, euthanasia becomes an option. Arguments fed to an agreement that incurring the treatment costs would only increase the poverty level of the family. This makes the living conditions more intolerable and the victim may never recover but die, leaving the members of the family in despicable poverty (Manning 78).
Deciding an early death for the victim becomes an appealing option to the affected members. This is also the case if the victim suffers from an incurable disease or is in a comma. To reduce the suffering of the victim the members opt to undertake euthanasia reasoning that they will eventually die, as the disease is not curable or might never wake up from the comma.
Christians strongly condemn euthanasia and even regard it as sinful and those involved should repent. They regard it as murder, which is against God’s commandments and morally wrong. A principle put forth and agreed upon, is that, God is the giver life and only He has the power and right to take it away at his appointed time (Patterson 88).
All humans are equal and no one is superior before the eyes of the Lord, thus, no person has the right to decide when another should die as this would be disregarding human life. Unions against euthanasia, formed by Christians are active and their effects are evident in the states where they operate (Biggs 56).
