There are many reasons why project implementations fail. Some reasons include failure to identify company needs, failure to distinguish company needs and wants, and failure to assess technical competency of staff. Some IT projects fail prior to the actual implementation due to poor planning or lack of experience. Failing to create an efficient plan is dangerous. Many companies do not select software that meets their needs. The key to a successful project implementation is to take the time to evaluate the company’s needs and plan for success. This paper is intended to discuss five indicators for IT failure and changes that can be made to eliminate their effects. Five Indicators for IT Failure
System implementation begins once an organization has acquired the system and continues through early stages following the go-live date. System implementation processes must be supported by the senior executive team and be viewed as an organizational priority. An implementation team must be organized when planning for the implementation of a new system. The role and function of the team is to coordinate budget plans and manage aspects of the system implementation. The implementation team must include a system champion. A system champion is someone who sees the new system as necessary to the organization in order to achieve goals this person is also well respected within the organization.
The Research paper on Case study on Implementation of quality systems through information technology systems in Athal Company
Case study on Implementation of quality systems through information technology systems in Athal Company Introduction Athal is a service offering company that was established in 1980. It offers inspection, testing, consulting, and quality control services. The company offers services to different companies in different industries through its 15 branches in United Kingdom. The company ...
Five indicators of IT failure include organizational baggage, lack of technology stability, failure to anticipate short-term disruptions, project complexity, and lack of an appropriate reward system. According to Bharadwaj, Keil, Mahring (2009) “Although IT systems are likely to differ in the strategic value to the organization, they nevertheless cause significant disruptions to a firm’s business operations when they fail.” Some parties involved in the implementation failure at Memorial Health Systems did not work well as a team. The system champions Fred Dryer and Joe Roberts did not take into consideration how physicians felt about their workload increasing with the adoption of the CPOE system. There was no determining the scope of the project and its achievements. Other fundamental activities excluded from the project include conversion, proper staff training, workflow and process analysis, and communications. Changes Made to Eliminate Indicator Effects
There were many indicators within the case study that lead to the project failure at Memorial Health Systems. The indicators are lack of belief in the project, insufficient leadership support, lack of candor, initiative undernourishment, and organizational inertia. There are ways the implementation team could have avoided project failure at Memorial Health. The objectives of the CPOE system needed to be clear. The objectives and initiatives needed to be communicated and tested with organizational members.
All staff concerns or debates should be welcomed. Being honest and communicating efficiently could have saved the CPOE project. The main factor of the project failure is lack of solid management. The original system champions Fred Dryer and Joe Roberts quit their position at Memorial Health before the project was completed. Instead of welcoming bad news the new CIO Dr. Melvin Sparks did not want to hear it. According to Gardner (2000) “Companies continue to invest heavily in IT solutions in hopes of improving operating efficiency and combating the effects of downsizing.” Conclusion
The Term Paper on Project Failure
I. Introduction Projects are set up as functions within a bigger organization for the undertaking of specific goals, objectives and targets. These projects are established to successfully carry out their respective purposes. Thus, the right people are recruited, hired and then assigned to work together for accomplishing their common mission, which should be positively clear to them from the very ...
Implementing new IT systems within an organization takes careful planning, effective communication, and teamwork. Some staff will not accept implementation of new systems, it is important that the system champion and the implementation team agree with the objective and initiative of the project. Strong leadership and welcoming of good and bad news are also important. Listening to criticism will help leaders work on what can be done to make the implementation process easier for those who will be affected. The organization’s leadership is responsible for minimizing the severity and occurrence of factors that threaten system implementation.
