Was this truly a disaster? What lessons can be learned from this case and similar disasters, particularly regarding the importance of such “human factors” as courage, truthfulness, and open communication?
The Vasa was built as a symbol of Sweden’s naval supremacy. Unequalled in size, ornamentation and firepower, the Vasa was intended to project might and to intimidate the nation’s enemies. Of course, the reality of Sweden’s many conquests in the Baltic region was not lost on its enemies. Further, the Vasa was a source of immense national pride. The first of its kind in any navy and by any country, it seemed a triumph of engineering and the nation’s technological prowess. Beyond the projection of unmatched force and national pride, however, the Vasa had more practical value.
As the navy’s flagship vessel, it would be employed in the interest of national defense, to transport military personnel and supplies as it waged war, and to apply force in collecting revenues. Moreover, the speed of its construction was occasioned by the loss of ships during combat. This led to demands by the king to have the Vasa and other ships completed far ahead of schedule. The fine prototype seen by a gushing public on the day of its inaugural voyage masked serious design and engineering flaws. It sailed a mere 1400 yards before it capsized and sunk to the bottom of the sea, in full view of a crowd of spectators. The toll on the national treasure was in excess of 5% of the nation’s Gross National Product (GNP), and even more importantly, it cost the lives of at least fifty persons. This was truly a disaster of monumental proportions.
1. The forerunner of the United Nations (UN) was the League of Nations, an organization conceived in similar circumstances during World War 1, and established in 1919 under the treaty of Versailles “ to promote international cooperation and to achieve peace and security”. The League of Nations seized its activities after failing to prevent the Second World War. The advance of science and economic ...
The failure and tragic end of the Vasa project is instructive with respect to certain human factors as described below:
It is absolutely critical that all members involved in the planning, designing and implementation of a project be fearless in acknowledging all actual problems and risks. Team members must have the courage to communicate all problems to the project manager who must, in turn, communicate with the stakeholders. The fear of failure, consequences of various forms (and in the Vasa project, the threat of punishment from the king) may inhibit the tendency to “speak out”, modify a project, or abandon it altogether, however, it must be done, especially when the consequences are significant with respect to wasted resources, and as the case study shows, when lives are at stake. Shipmaster Hybertson acknowledged his inability to conform to the King’s specifications, but ultimately acquiesced when, under pressure, he decided “to do whatever is necessary to satisfy the king’s demands.” At the outset of a project, it is necessary to create an environment where fear and intimidation are removed.
The need for truthfulness cannot be over-emphasized. In order to succeed in a project, team members and the project manager must be truthful in all actions and communications. Information at all stages of the project’s progress must always be accurate even if it less than desirable, and especially when there are significant risks to the public (Heldman, 2013).
Truthfulness also relates to how problems are minimized as in the case of the Vasa project when Admiral Flemming discounted the obvious design and engineering flaws during the testing stage with his response that “the shipbuilder has built ships before.”
Effective communication is the lifeblood of a project. There has to be clear channels of communication between the team members, the project manager, and the stakeholders. The absence of information-sharing by the master shipbuilder, occasional breakdowns in information flow among the project manager, Admiral Flemming, and the shipbuilder and the king, were critical factors resulting in the failure of the project. The lesson to be learnt here is how absolutely essential a communications plan is to the success of a project (Larson and Gray, 2011).
1. The major processes of Project Communications Management are: a. Plan Communications Management, Management Communications, and Control Communications. b. Plan Communications Management, Develop Responses, Report Progress, and Distribute Information. c. Plan Communications, Distribute Information, and Schedule Reporting. d. Distribute Information, Report Changes, Update Project Documents, and ...
Heldman, K. (2011).
PMP Project Management Professional exam study guide, (7th ed.).
Indianapolis, IN: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2011).
Project management: The managerial process, (5th
New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.