Macbeth – Presentation Of Characters Essay, Research Macbeth – Presentation Of Characters Macbeth, a play by William Shakespeare written sometime between 1603-1606, is a tragic story of death and deceit amongst the noblemen of Scotland. The two main characters are Macbeth, Thane of Glamis and his wife Lady Macbeth. The play is based around the conflict in Scotland at the time between the King and rebellious Scotsmen, who were overcome single-handedly by Macbeth on the side of the King, Duncan. Macbeth and his fellow kinsman Banquo were met on a heath by three witches who prophesised Macbeth becoming Thane of Cawdor, and later King of Scotland. When he later learned he had been made Thane of Cawdor for his service to the crown, he believed that it was the work of the witches.
However, rather than leaving it to the witches, Macbeth decided he would have to kill the king himself if he wanted the crown, fulfilling his ambition. Therefore, with the influence and assistance of his wife, he eventually murdered King Duncan, with himself then becoming king. He is r! exultantly guilt ridden, but his wife is very calm and accepts no responsibility for Duncan? s death. The tables turn later on in the play though, with Macbeth continuing his killing to gain more power and becoming more independent from his wife, eventually leading to her going mad and committing suicide. This play and the topics explored within it were very relevant to the time in which it was written. Practising witchcraft became an executable offence in 1604, so the witches in the play would have caused quite some controversy.
Have your ever seen a play? Plays can be the most wonderful thing in the world. Plays be gain takin play hundreds of years ago. The one play that was played years ago is still looked at to be one of the best plays ever to have stepped foot on the stage. The play is called Macbeth and was first performed in the summer of 1606 with James and the visiting king of Denmark in attendance. The play was ...
Regicide, the murder of a king or queen, was also an extremely serious crime as the king was believed to have been chosen by God, so to kill the king was to act against God and also nature. Today it is still the only executable offence in the United Kingdom. The King of England when the play was written, James I, was interested in the supernatural. He also survived an assassination attempt in his youth and had an ancestor named Banquo, who was historically evil but was made good in Shakespeare? s play. All of these aspects of the play would have appealed to King James which implies it may have been written for him. The whole idea of rebellion and deceit is also linked to more topical events of the time, namely the gunpowder plot of 1605 when an at temp! t was made to blow up the Houses Of Parliament.
Act 1 Scene 1 of the play sets the scene with a very short, mysterious gathering of the three witches. They appear suddenly, in mid-conversation, which is dramatic and creates unclear ideas about the dubious topics of conversation. This in turn creates an air of tension, suspicion and an ominous atmosphere. The presence of thunder and lightning is a symbol of evil and creates a more hostile atmosphere. This suggests that the rest of the play will be full of deceit; revenge; anger and pain, implying the play will be a tragedy. This scene creates a sense of mystery and intrigue, and as the scene is short, there is little evidence to go on, so there is nothing about which the audience can be decisive or certain.
As far as what we learn about Macbeth goes, we know that the witches plan to meet Macbeth later in the play on the same heath as they are in this scene. We also learn that there will be some sort of battle from which Macbeth will emerge victorious. They show this in the! ir conversation: ? ? When the battle? s lost, and won? This shows that one side, (as we later learn the rebellious Scots led by Macdonald) will emerge losers and the other (Macbeth) will emerge victorious. This is speaking in a contradictory way, and makes use of antithesis. This has relevance to many instances later in the play where characters have contradictory thoughts. Antithesis is used again in this scene in the ultimate stanza, the witches chant a warning: ? ? Fair is foul, and foul is fair, Hover through the fog and filthy air? This implies that appearances are deceptive, and it creates a sense of mystery and encourages thought as to what significance this may hold for later in the play.
Macbeth Literary Analysis Krystal Macbeth Literary Analysis Essay, Research Paper Krystal Abbott Pat Patterson English IV Friday, December 03, 1999 Macbeth In Shakespeare? s lifetime he wrote many plays. Many of them were critically acclaimed and others cast aside. The crowd always wanted to be more thoroughly entertained and Shakespeare always tried to keep up with the people? s needs. In 1605, ...
As it is a rhyming couplet, it is more memorable and dramatically effective to the audience. The confused messages it conveys provoke deep thought amongst the members of the audience. This scene is similar to an introduction or prologue to a novel. Act 1, Scene 2 of the play is the? real? beginning. The audience hears about the gruesome way in which Macbeth slaughtered the opposing Scotsmen, led by Macdonald.
In this scene, a wounded soldier who comes fresh from battle glorifies Macbeth: he is credited to the entire defeat of the Scots single-handed. The audience builds a picture of Macbeth as a very brave, courageous fighter and leader in battle. The King of Scotland, Duncan, also values Macbeth very highly, which leads to his becoming Thane of Cawdor. Duncan shows his gratitude to Macbeth during the soldier? s account of the battle: ? ? O valiant cousin, worthy gentleman! ? This shows that the king regards Macbeth so highly he sees him as a relative. He sees him as a brave and loyal soldier; a heroic fighter. However, Macbeth appears quite ruthless, and he seems to have no conscience when fighting for his king.
He gives the impression of being a little arrogant and ostentatious. This is evident particularly in the brutal way in which he slaughtered Macdonald, as described by the wounded soldier: ? ? Till he unsealed him from the nave to th? chops, And fixed his head upon our battlements? This shows that Macbeth is a cold-hearted predator when it comes to battle. Here, Macbeth is not at all troubled by the blood he has shed. This is notably comparable to Act 2, Scene 2 where he is the complete opposite, plagued with guilt over his murderous actions where the blood symbolises guilt.
In turn, both relate back to Act 1, Scene 1 and the prediction of contradiction later in the play. After this scene, the feelings of the audience about Macbeth are that he is a noble, loyal servant to the king, who goes fearlessly into battle, and would die for his cause. He does, however, appear much more brutal and violent than first imagined. This scene also reinforces the witches? prophecy that they would meet Macbeth on the heath once the battles are over and he emerges victorious.
Who Is To Blame For The Tragedy of Macbeth Macbeth, the play was one of Shakespeare's bloody and goriest tragedies. It was based on a true story of the Celtic throne. It is a play about murder, power, ambition, greed and deception. The play is set in bleak Scotland, where King Duncan rules over all. At the start of the play Scotland is at battle with Norway.Macbeth is Thane of Glamis and has ...
However brutal he may appear though, the audience gets the impression that he is a very loyal servant, and is a very trustworthy character. Act 1, Scene 3 is a very significant part of the play and has an adverse effect on the remainder of it. This is the scene first prophesised in Act 1, Scene 1 where the witches say they will meet Macbeth. Towards the beginning of this scene, we learn that the witches are in fact evil.
One of them punishes a woman who refused to give her a chestnut by creating a storm for the woman? s husband at sea. All three witches get pleasure out of this evil. There is also an indication that they may have some kind of supernatural powers, as they have a cut-off thumb, which they claim is from the husband of the woman who refused the witch a chestnut. This suggestion of magical or supernatural powers reinforces the intrigue created in Act 1, Scene 1.
As Macbeth enters, his first words echo the final words of the witches in the first scene, as he addresses Banquo: ? ? So foul and fair a day I have not seen? This refers back to the witches: ? ? Fair is foul and foul is fair? The significance of Macbeth saying this is that he is again suggesting the idea of appearances being deceptive in terms of them winning the battle, but at the same time the weather being horrific. This is ironic as he is the character who later becomes two-faced and deceptive, so he is in fact talking about himself. Following the introduction to the third scene comes the primary climax of the play: the meeting of Macbeth, Banquo and the witches. The witches greet Macbeth with a prophecy – that he will become Thane of Cawdor, and then King of Scotland. At first, Macbeth appears slightly taken aback.
However, he soon dismisses what he considers an absurd prediction. Banquo is similarly startled and surprised, and questions the accuracy of what the witches have said. They also tell Banquo that he will have children who will become Kings of Scotland, although he will not make it himself. Here Macbeth re-enters into the conversation, appearing rather disturbed by what has been said, and he is anxious to hear the basis upon which the witches have prophesised. He demands to know more of them: ? ? Stay, you imperfect speakers, tell me more? This shows his apprehension to relieve his ignorance. The witches promptly depart, and although Macbeth and Banquo engage in light conversation about the occurrence, they do not really take it seriously.
... Macbeth in killing Duncan. After Duncan is killed, Lady Macbeth acts as if the news shocked her, "Help me hence, ho!" 2 In scene vii of Act ... meant for him to become king. If the witches had not met Macbeth, he would not have become king. His ambition grew more ... later he will be king. The three witches suggested his destiny. Macbeth's goal was not to become king until the witches made him believe it ...
Shortly afterwards, Ross meets Macbeth and Banquo. He praises Macbeth? s efforts in the battles, and goes on to inform him of his honorary new role, Thane of Cawdor. At first, Macbeth is shocked, and he immediately questions Ross. Once Macbeth acknowledges the news of the traitorous behaviour of the then present Thane of Cawdor, he believes that his honour is the work of the witches and that they are able to change the future. Macbeth immediately jumps to the obvious conclusion: he believes that, having fulfilled the primary part of the prophecy: he will soon accomplish the second and become king. He demonstrates this in his aside: ? ? Glamis and Thane of Cawdor.
The greatest is behind? This is the first sign that Macbeth has some kind of deceitful, evil side to his nature. Banquo intelligently tracks Macbeth? s thought, and speaks aloud about his concerns of the evil nature of the witches, and what chaos they could potentially cause. He refers to them as? instruments of darkness? , using imagery of darkness representing evil. Shakespeare makes use of dramatic irony here, as we, the audience, are aware from Act 1, Scene 2 that Macbeth has been made Thane of Cawdor for his bravery and not by the witches. Macbeth is presented as a very confused character at this point though; arguing with himself in his asides. He unsuccessfully attempts to rationalise as to whether the witches? intentions are good or evil.
However, already his thoughts turn to potential regicide. At this point in the play though, Macbeth is very uncomfortable with the thought of killing the king, and he is very insecure as he shows in another of his asides: ? ? My thought, whose murder yet is but fantastical? Here he demonstrates that for the moment, his evil thoughts are only fantasy. It appears here that Macbeth is quite gullible and has been deceived into believing the witches prophecy, simply because they were aware of his becoming Thane of Cawdor prior to him. Macbeth? s times of silence during his asides concern Banquo and Ross. However, from the moment that Macbeth learns he is Thane, his lies begin, as he claims he has forgotten about killing the king to Banquo and Ross when in fact his ambitions have been fuelled and his mind is on nothing else. There is an evident uncertainty as to what will happen next, with the idea prominent in Macbeth? s brain.
p>In the beginning of the play, The Tragedy of Macbeth, Macbeth is merely a nobleman and a Scottish general in King Duncan's army. Macbeth later becomes the deserving Thane of Glam is and Cawdor and the undeserving King of Scotland (Dominic 255). In the beginning Macbeth is a man with good intentions and a good heart; sometimes he just has a hard time following his good instincts and heart. ...
The original impression of Macbeth to the audience is immediately put into question. Although he has done no physical harm to anyone, his treacherous thoughts lead the audience to begin to doubt the loyalty and devotion of Macbeth to his King and country he was originally credited with. Act 1, Scene 4 is where Macbeth really begins to weave his web of deceit. The scene begins with King Duncan talking of the dishonesty and mistrust he experienced with the previous Thane of Cawdor.
This is ironic considering the treacherous thoughts the new Thane of Cawdor, Macbeth, has already begun to have. Similarly, the beginning of Act 1, Scene 6 is ironic with King Duncan and Banquo talking about the security and pleasantness that Macbeth? s castle offers them for their visit. In Act 1, Scene 4, Macbeth enters and King Duncan immediately beings to praise him for his efforts in the recent battles. The King is very grateful, and tells Macbeth that he can never repay him for his duties.
Here Macbeth is extremely two-faced, telling the King that to serve him is in itself enough of a reward for his duties: ? ? The service and the loyalty I owe, In doing it, pays itself? Considering his regicidal thoughts in the previous scene, this is extremely dishonest and deceitful of Macbeth. This again demonstrates an example of the last line of Act 1, Scene 1, where the witches suggest that appearances can be deceptive. In this scene, Macbeth discovers a second obstacle he must overcome if he is to fulfil his ambition and the witches? prophecy. King Duncan announces that, following the betrayal of the previous Thane of Cawdor, the new heir to his throne will be his son, Malcolm. This news is devastating to Macbeth, as obviously, if he is to become King, he not only has King Duncan to surpass, but also the obstacle created by the Prince of Cumberland and new heir, Malcolm. However, Macbeth is very successful at keeping his feelings hidden.
He does not actually address the subject directly though; he decides to invite the King and his subjects to dinner at his home. King Duncan is oblivious to any ulterior motives Macbeth has, and merely takes the invitation as a kind gesture. In the subsequent aside, Macbeth reveals his real feelings: ? ? The Prince of Cumberland – that is a step on which I must fall down or else o? er leap. ? Here again Macbeth is planning to murder someone, though this time the new obstacle in his path to achieve his ambition is Malcolm, Prince of Cumberland. This shows the greed and jealousy behind his loyal, humble exterior.
... evil images.Scene II An intoxicated Lady Macbeth awaits the return of Macbeth from Duncan's room as the scene begins. She has drugged the ... to kill Duncan is shown by saying, "Let ... by his appearance at all.When Duncan states that Malcolm shall be the next king of Scotland, Macbeth's ambition is sparked and the idea ...
This is all an example of dramatic irony, as we, the audience are aware of Macbeth? s true intentions, whereas King Duncan and the Prince of Cumberland are not. This scene is again similar to Act 1, Scene 6 in which the guests arrive at the home of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth. There is a conversation between King Duncan and Lady Macbeth, and there are many similarities visible here between the behaviour of Macbeth in Act 1, Scene 4 and that of Lady Macbeth in this scene. She is extremely welcoming and displays kindness towards King Duncan, when in fact behind this she is planning his death making the scene very ironic. We see a great contrast in Lady Macbeth compared to her behaviour in the previous scene, in which she asks to lose her conscience to enable her to assist in the murder of King Duncan. This is again comparable to Macbeth in Act 1, Scene 4 where he plans to murder Duncan, but is extremely two-faced in the subsequent scene by being welcoming and kind to the King.
Lady Macbeth makes a great effort to ensure that Duncan feels completely relaxed and secure in her hands as hostess. She shows this when speaking to him: ? ? All our service in every point twice done, and then done double. ? This demonstrates the effort made to make Duncan feel completely comfortable and at ease, in complete trust of Lady Macbeth and wholly unaware of her cruel intentions. The words of Duncan only reinforce how susceptible he has been to the lies of Macbeth and his wife. He shows this in the last line of the scene: ? ? Conduct me to mine host. We love him highly.
? These are doubtless the words of someone unreservedly ignorant to his fate. Act 1, Scene 5 is the first scene in which we meet Lady Macbeth, the other main character of the play. The first impressions of Macbeth gained by the audience are positive which become increasingly negative as the play develops. In great contrast, the very first impressions we gain of Lady Macbeth are of an evil, scheming and ambitious character. She suggests that she is going to influence Macbeth into making sure he becomes King.
She has a hunger for power and is selfish, with no conscience. This scene appears to suggest that Lady Macbeth is the dominant force in her relationship with her husband. She makes a bizarre appeal to the spirits to make her less effeminate and more brutal and courageous. She asks for supernatural help, which links her to the witches at the beginning of the play. She wishes to lose her femininity and become more masculine, and to exonerate her conscience of any evils she may commit. An example of this is in her appeal to the spirits: ? ? Come, you spirits that tend on moral thoughts, unsex me here, and fill me from the crown to the toe top-full of direst cruelty.
Make thick my blood. ? This indicates her desire to be less of a stereotypical female, and to have the fortitude to employ whatever means necessary to accomplish her aspirations. Lady Macbeth appeals to the spirits to remove her maternal instincts, from which we are able to make an educated guess that she has given birth to a child. However, we are also aware that the child subsequently died, as later in the play we learn that Macbeth has no children. The death of this child may have caused Lady Macbeth bitterness, which fuels her ambition to become Queen of Scotland.
There is also significance in her asking the spirits to thicken her blood, as later in the play Shakespeare uses imagery to make blood represent guilt. Therefore, asking for the thickening of her blood represents allowing her to withstand guilt, and removing her conscience. From the point of view of the audience, the introduction of Lady Macbeth is very dramatic and violent. Her appeal to the spirits is of great compassion and since! ity; she immediately appears very cold, hard and malicious. Lady Macbeth doubts the capabilities of her husband upon delivery of his letter, and immediately decides to make it her responsibility to ensure he fulfils his ambition. She believes that Macbeth will be too good-natured to go through with the deed.
However, she is also aware of the ambition of her husband. It is on this basis that she decides to take the responsibility. She will influence him to ensure he goes through with it, because she is unsure to what lengths he will go. She demonstrates this in commenting to herself on the letter: ? ? Yet I fear thy nature. It is too full o th? milk of human kindness. ? This implies that although Macbeth may be very ambitious, Lady Macbeth has doubts as to whether or not he will go to the extent of killing his King.
However, in the age in which this play is set, women could only make something of themselves with the aid of a man. The status of a woman? s husband determined her own status. Therefore, it is actually debatable whether Lady Macbeth is doing this to assist her husband, or if it is for her own person gain to become Queen. In addition, she offers encouragement to her husband for him to not let his true feelings be outwardly visible. This is an example of the witches? idea of appearances being deceptive. She tells him: ? ? Your hand, your tongue; look like the innocent flower, but be the serpent under? t.
? This indicates that Lady Macbeth wants Macbeth to be outwardly loyal but inwardly deceitful: extremely two-faced. Lady Macbeth appears to be the dominant force in her relationship with Macbeth. She makes the decisions and takes the actions. They are very open and honest with each other though, and there is a lot of evident love and passion between them. She does appear to be in control all the time and Macbeth seems to have little choice but to agree with her. This is shown again when she demands? leave all the rest to me? , relating to the planning of Duncan? s murder.
Act 1, Scene 7 contains the famous soliloquy of Macbeth, in which he debates over whether or not he should murder King Duncan. He puts forward one reason for killing him: fulfilling his ambition. In contrast, he puts forward many reasons as to why he should not kill Duncan. These include Duncan? s innocence, the trust Duncan has for him and how regicide is an unnatural act as according to the divine right of Kings. As God has chosen the King, he would be going against God and killing him would unbalance nature, causing chaos or a political storm. In addition, Duncan is a good king, great pity would be caused and there would be complications in dealing with the guards and kinsmen.
Duncan would have no opportunity to defend himself, so it would not be even-handed justice, and also the significant matter of Macbeth? s conscience in killing his own King. This is all summed up in his reason for killing in his soliloquy: ? ? I have no spur to prick the sides of my intent, but only vaulting ambition. ? This indicates that although there are many reasons against killing Duncan, his ambition to become King is so strong it dominates over them all. Mentally, Macbeth appears relatively stable in his soliloquy, as he is able to rationally debate with himself whether or not he should kill Duncan. He does appear quite confused, although at the end of his soliloquy he logically makes up his mind not to kill Duncan. Macbeth is presented as a strong character for defying his ambition.
He exclaims his decision to Lady Macbeth almost straightaway: ? ? We will proceed no further in this business. ? This shows he has decided not to go ahead with the murder. Nevertheless, when it comes to overcoming his wife? s ambition, he fails. Lady Macbeth easily influences him and persuades him that to murder Duncan is the right thing to do. Lady Macbeth pressurizes Macbeth by making him feel un-manly and cowardly, and she makes him feel inferior to her. To the audience he appears weak for his inability to remain defiant against his wife.
She blackmails him into murdering Duncan: ? ? And live a coward in thine own esteem, letting? I dare not? wait upon? I would? . ? This shows how she makes him feel cowardly and secondary to her, and in doing so persuades him to take part in Duncan? s murder. Lady Macbeth is a manipulative character, and the perception of her by the audience is of an evil, spiteful character with no conscience who will stop at nothing to achieve her ambition. The feeling of the audience towards Macbeth is partial respect for deciding not to go ahead.
However, the audience? s perception of Macbeth is that he is cowardly for giving into his wife? s manipulation. She takes her persuasive methods to such an extent as to say she would rather kill her own child than give in to conscience and reason over the issue of killing Duncan. She expresses this to Macbeth: ? ? I would, while it was smiling in my face, have plucked my nipple from his boneless gums and dashed the brains out, had I so sworn as you have done to this. ? This may show that Lady Macbeth is really such an evil, vicious and ambitious character that she would rather kill her child than not achieve her full potential in society. It may also be an indication that she has in fact rid herself of her femininity and been overcome so as her maternal instinct is lost. On the other hand she could be using hyperbole to persuade her husband by touching a raw nerve in making him feel cowardly and effeminate.
Lady Macbeth? s character comes across in this scene as extremely strong, and with no apparent doubt in her mind about what actions to take concerning the fulfilling of her ambition. She is manipulative and tactical in her persuasion of her husband to kill Duncan. Macbeth in comparison is very weak in fighting his side of the argument, which in fact assists his wife in persuading him. This may have been because he was so uncertain in his aside as to whether killing Duncan was the right thing to do.
Throughout the whole of Act 1, Lady Macbeth has changed very little. If anything, she has gone from being an ambitious, nasty character, to a scheming, extremely ambitious, uncaring, plain evil character who will stop at nothing to achieve her goals. Macbeth appears to have changed from being a heroic warrior, to a devious, two-faced liar. However, at this point in the play, he is still the character who questions the morality of certain actions. In comparison, it would appear that! Lady Macbeth takes the action primarily, and then faces the consequences and suffers later.
This becomes apparent further on in the play, where the pair appear to swap their roles. Macbeth becomes dominant, and Lady Macbeth a guilt-ridden wreck. In Act 2, Scene 1 we see Macbeth with Banquo. Shakespeare does this to show the audience how the pair have grown apart and how Macbeth is becoming increasingly evil.
The first indication of this is in the apprehension with which Banquo greets Macbeth when they meet – unlike King Duncan, Banquo does not feel secure and feels the need to ask for his sword from his servant upon hearing someone enter the room. This scene uses a lot more of the imagery found in Act 1, Scene 3 where darkness represents malevolence, and creates an evil atmosphere. The atmosphere is very appropriate as Macbeth is again dishonest with Banquo. When Banquo mentions his dreams of the witches and how they have disturbed his thoughts, Macbeth claims to have forgotten about them altogether, when in fact it is the exact opposite. He seems to become more isolated as the play develops, and he conceals his true feelings simply, yet effectively here, claiming: ? ? I think not of them? This is a complete lie, which represents the obvious divide that now exists between Macbeth and his formerly close friend Banquo. Eventually this distance leads Macbeth to have Banquo murdered.
Following the departure of Banquo, Macbeth begins his hallucination. He believes he can see a dagger in front of him. The dagger he sees could be a representation of his ambition to become King of Scotland. The fact that he is hallucinating is also an indication of his mental instability and insecurity at the time.
It could be argued that the dagger is proven to be his ambition when it leads him to the chamber of Duncan: ? ? Is this a dagger which I see before me, the handle toward my hand? Come, let me clutch thee. ? His desire to hold the dagger here is an indication of his desperation to accomplish the deed as swiftly as possible, before he has any regrets. Following this, Macbeth believes that? go uts of blood? are appearing on the dagger. The blood could represent guilt and the appearance of it on the dagger suggests that some kind of supernatural work, of witchcraft or wizardry is responsible.
Macbeth? s mind in this scene appears to be dazed, confused and unsure of what he is doing. It shows that he has very mixed up emotions and is not coping well. His ambition is taking over his guilt and rationality. However, the hallucination represents the mental fight Macbeth is having between the two. Another idea is that the witches have sent the hallucination, which causes his confusion. His character does now seem completely evil, and he no longer has any physical influences, such as Lady Macbeth in Act 1, Scene 7.
He is killing, or planning to kill of his own accord, and this makes him evi! l and nasty. It is notable, however, that although he does eventually kill Duncan, he does not find the task easy. I believe that Shakespeare has included this scene to develop Macbeth into a more complex, emotional character. His mentally unstable appearance suggests that he may not be entirely responsible for Duncan? s murder. Act 2, Scene 2 is set immediately after Macbeth has murdered King Duncan. This scene is incredibly ironic considering what happens later in the play, when Macbeth and Lady Macbeth exchange roles from the way they behave in this scene.
Macbeth is even more confused and dazed than he was before killing Duncan, and he displays an immediate regret for doing it. Having killed him, he goes immediately to Lady Macbeth without even completing the deed and disposing of the daggers. For the first time in the play, Macbeth displays an air of authority in declaring that he will not return to the scene of the crime, and that Lady Macbeth must do it for him. He is extremely paranoid, scared and frightened. This is indicated in Macbeth? s inability to say Amen, suggesting that he feels he will go to hell and is very unholy for killing Duncan, as he tells Lady Macbeth: ? ? List? ning their fear I could not say? Amen? when they did say? God bless us? . ? This shows that he truly feels God no longer blesses him.
In addition, Macbeth hears a voice that says he will never sleep again: ? ? Sleep no more: Macbeth does murder sleep, the innocent sleep. ? This shows that his character has a regret immediately for killing Duncan. He has murdered someone in his sleep, and in the form of Duncan, sleep symbolises innocence. Therefore, Macbeth believes he will be unable to sleep. Sleep deprivation can cause depression and make one unhealthy, so by taking Duncan? s sleep, Macbeth feels he too will be deprived of the privilege. All of these things Macbeth does are representations of evil taking away innocence; in the form of sleep, Duncan and religious faith.
Shakespeare then introduces a new form of imagery, which becomes more significant later in the play, in particular to Lady Macbeth. Macbeth feels he cannot wash off the blood of Duncan, which represents the way in which his conscience will plague him for the rest of his life. Blood is a symbol of guilt here, and Macbeth feels he will never lose his. He uses hyperbole and says there is so much blood on his hands, that to wash them in the sea would only turn the waters red rather than cleanse him. Shakespeare presents Macbeth? s guilt and remorse here in the form of him being unable to wash off the blood.
In talking of washing the blood off his hands, Macbeth means the mental blood in its representation of guilt. He regrets murdering Duncan very much, and hallucinates again hearing a knocking sound. He appeals to the knocking to awaken Duncan again, and shows how much he regrets his actions at the end of the scene: ? ? Wake Duncan with thy knocking. I would thou couldst. ? This shows that at this moment in the play, Macbeth would do anything to bring King Duncan back to life. Lady Macbeth, in direct comparison, copes perfectly well with the whole situation.
At the very beginning of the scene, she appears quite agitated and nervous, appealing to shrieking owls to silence themselves. However, once Macbeth has returned to her, she appears completely calm and relaxed about the situation. She immediately complains to her husband for having not completed his task by bringing the daggers back to her, instead of disposing of them. Again she tries to make him feel cowardly for not completing it, however this time unsuccessfully.
Lady Macbeth states to Macbeth that if they think about the deed too much they will both go mad. This is ironic as she goes mad later in the play. She does at this point though, appear to be in control of the situation. She orders Macbeth around by telling him to ensure all his tracks have been covered, and to forget that the whole event ever occurred. Having smeared the blood over the Kings guards, Lady Macbeth returns with a com! plete ly clear conscience. She redirects all criticism onto Macbeth and will not accept any responsibility for assisting in the murder of King Duncan.
She also calls Macbeth a coward for not returning the daggers here: ? ? My hands are of your colour, but I shame to wear a heart so white. ? This supports the suggestion that Lady Macbeth feels no guilt, as if blood is a representation of guilt, her white heart represents no guilt whatsoever. Despite having no conscience regarding the deed, Lady Macbeth remains very paranoid about anyone discovering their guilt. She hears a knocking noise many times towards the end of this scene, which unnerves her and makes her apprehensive.
Later in the play, the roles are exchanged almost perfectly. Macbeth gradually becomes increasingly evil, and loses his conscience altogether. Lady Macbeth, in comparison, goes mad and commits suicide because of her guilt in assisting in Duncan? s murder becomes so strong she is unable to live any longer. She now feels she is unable to wash the blood off her hands, whereas Macbeth has forgotten about the incident completely. He also manages to become much more independent from her, and is able to continue his corruptive behaviour without her assistance and support. Shakespeare has structured the play to reflect Macbeth? s moral dilemma, in that each scene goes in a sequence of good and evil.
For instance, Act 1, Scene 1 is evil, Act 2, Scene 2 good, then Act 1, Scene 3 evil again. This represents the changing opinions and feelings of Macbeth about whether or not to kill Duncan. The way that he is constantly changing his mind about whether or not he should fulfil his ambition follows the same pattern as the representations of good and evil in each scene. Notably, both the final scene studied and Macbeth? s opinions emerge evil, with Macbeth? s guilt-ridden actions in the final scene, and Duncan? s death towards the end of the studied section of the play. Shakespeare uses imagery throughout the whole of the play. However, most prominent are his representations of good and evil, as light and darkness.
Quite stereotypically, the storms, bad weather, thunder and lightning in the scenes with the witches represent their evil presence, and some indication of supernatural activity. Shakespeare also uses blood to represent guilt, and there are many references made throughout the play to blood, which signifies its representation of evil later in the play. The use of asides is also effective, as it allows the audience to know Macbeth? s deepest inner thoughts, giving them the advantage of dramatic irony over the other characters. This engages the audience, as they can anticipate how the play will develop.
However, this play clearly demonstrates Shakespeare at his most successful, with unexpected plot twists that prove the predictions of the audience wrong. In conclusion, I believe Shakespeare has very successfully portrayed the moral dilemma faced by Lady Macbeth and her husband. He challenges certain stereotypes, such as women? s femininity, and men? s masculinity. He does this by giving Lady Macbeth the role of appealing to the spirits to unsex her, enabling her to assist in Duncan? s murder without maternal instincts of femininity creating any boundaries or restrictions to her potential capabilities. Macbeth is presented as a very strong character physically, able to overcome large armies of men.
However, mentally he is weak willed and finds coping with his ambition very difficult. He has internal conflicts with himself trying to decide whether or not to fulfil his ambition and become King, or to remain loyal to his master and King, Duncan. He does actually come to his own conclusions in deciding to not commit the deed. However, he has no strength of character and allows Lady Macbeth to manipulate him by questioning his masculinity.
Eventually, this leads Macbeth to not only taking the life of his King, but to continue his tyranny as king by slaughtering anyone who dares to cross his path. Lady Macbeth in comparison does exactly the opposite. She starts by appealing to the spirits to unsex her, and she becomes a spiteful, evil, manipulative character. Her ambition is even greater than Macbeth? s, and it fuels her onwards to persuade her husband to go ahead and commit regicide, allowing her to become Queen.
Following her becoming Queen, however, she begins to lose her hard, cold exterior, and can no longer remain free of responsibility for Duncan? s death. Eventually, the thought of her guilt horrifies her so much that she goes mad and commits suicide. This suggests that she was only able to accept no responsibility with the false cover of the spirits, and not independently. Macbeth, however, had the natural resilience to cope with the responsibility. This is proven in his progression to become a stronger and more powerful king. The feeling of the audience towards each character also changes as the play develops.
Macbeth appears a heroic warrior at first, and by! the end of Act 2, Scene 2 the audience views him as an evil, unkind, dishonest character, who is extremely selfish. Lady Macbeth is viewed as a manipulative, evil character at first. However, when she goes mad with guilt, there is some sympathy from the audience towards her. Finally, this play teaches some quite important moral values: that one should never let power influence rational decisions; that honesty eventually prevails; that ambition can be extremely dangerous; and that ultimately, good always overcomes evil..