The epistle from Horace’s Art of Poetry was not merely a guide for good literature, but it was a sophisticated writing that displayed his principles and wisdom, and the contemporary Hellenistic influence on the Romans.
Horace’s profound work clearly asserted his position as a literary master. Throughout his letter to Piso, he was able to make his description interesting and explanation convincing. He exhibited his expertise in literature by presenting detailed guidelines to write proficiently. Among his suggestions, he stressed precision, good iambic lines, and proper literary styles and formats. He also emphasized on the importance to strive for unity, as the writing would lose strength without coherence. If he were not a master at literature, he would not be able to discuss the technical details in depth. Furthermore, Horace was not only a man with distinguished achievements, but he was also a man with great principles. With many people yearning for success, he described Rome as “a nation greedy just for fame” (129).
He criticized the Romans for being indulgent and materialistic. Since everybody was so absorbed in earning money, he asked, “what poems can we expect to write worth coating with protective oils and storing in fine wood?” (129).
To Horace, money was not the primary motivation to pursue his writing career, and that explained why Horace rejected Augustus’s offer to become his secretary, which was an honorable position for a freed man. With his great virtues and morals, Horace was undoubtedly one of the best poets in the Roman Empire.
... whole person is involved in writing. I feel Fran would have us regard literature in the same way that ... it was alright." Although he refused to be a man by not recognizing the significance of woman, she ... something from her by reading her. Clearly, the man in this poem has not taken the woman seriously ... each time the woman wanted to be something, the man rejected that role for her, thus not taking her ...
Horace’s writings revealed the dominant Hellenistic influence. They were eloquent and highly intellectual, much nearer to that of the scholarly Greek writers of the Hellenistic period. He showed that he possessed deep knowledge of the Greek literature, since he often referred to Greek writers and to their plays. In his letter to Piso, he used Homer’s Odyssey as an example of great literature. “Make your models Greek,” as Horace declared, “and turn their pages nightly; turn them daily too” (127).
This indicated his fondness of the Greek models. In addition, he mentioned that poets “[sung] about Italian themes in tragedies and comedies attired in Roman clothes” (128).
Evidently, Hellenism had impacted not only Horace, but also the contemporary poets. By observing how Hellenism had revolutionized the theoretical thinking of the poet of Rome, one can conclude that the impact of Hellenism was unquestionably prominent.
Horace’s work of art demonstrated his expertise in writing, as well as the Hellenistic influence on Roman writers. Horace declared, “To flee vice is the beginning of virtue, and to have got rid of folly is the beginning of wisdom.” And Horace’s wisdom had presented new insights to the ancient Roman Empire. In studying Horace’s polished writings and distinguished qualities, scholars can further investigate how Greek culture had progressively integrated itself to the ancient Roman’s lives.
J. Atchity, Kennedy. The Classical Roman Reader. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997