Gaining Title Over complex material Bartholomae and Petrosky in the introduction to “Ways of Reading,’ illustrate the correlations a reader has with the information that is being conceived. This means one should be guided by his own impressions as they read, without asking for other opinions as confirmation. The reader should belittle the idea of seeking “experts’ to resolve the issue of what the essay really meant. “Is not what it means to the experts but what it means to you as a reader willing to take the chance to construct a reading. You can be the authority, , , , you dont have to turn to others (B&P p. 8).’ In other words, form your own ideas and explanations, what does it mean to you.
Perhaps this can relate to Percy when he talks about “experts’, and the “complex man.’ These concepts could apply to the reader that Bartholomae and Petrosky are describing. The “complex man’ is someone who can look past the “experts’ and form a path of his own, expressing his own opinions. “In a sense, he exploits his fellow tourists; he stands on their shoulders to see the canyon (Percy p. 567).’ This applies to the strong readers who “do not need experts to explain these stories and essays (B&P p. 9).’ Like the tourist who does not need the given tour to realize the beauty of the canyon, he sees it himself. Lets get back to Percy’s concept of “experts’, which relates to those whose knowledge helps validate common folks, and how it corresponds to the paradox in the introduction.
The Essay on Michael And Hannah In "The Reader" By Bernhard Schlink
“Leaving was her punishment.” Throughout “The Reader” the relationship between Hanna and Michael changes. In Part 1 their relationship begins and develops into a very sexual and personal affair. He blames himself for her leaving him. In Part 2 it turns political and they are very separated throughout the trail, Michael also learns about the truth about Hanna. In Part 3 ...
The paradox is the struggle one has with a reading because it is oppressive and doesn’t know how to go about reading it. This idea of “experts’s tates that one needs a higher authority to validate something as authentic, real or true. So a student who is uncertain about a text, can receive someone elses opinion to help understand. “What they want from him is not ethnological explanations; all they want is his approval (Percy p. 570).’ This can apply to the reader who needs “approval’ on a difficult text. But why do we need such certification? Do we not trust our own beliefs? Instead, one should read by contsructing ideas and values from themselves without the opinions of other beings.
This is how one regains “title’ over complex material. By knowing your limits and abilities, by taking command of the essay, while understanding its complexity. “To take command of complex material, , , , you need not subordinate yourself to experts; you can assume the authority to provide such a reading on your own (B&P p 10).’ This claims its ok to be uncertain, but again, know your limits. It may take you three or four times of reading the piece to fully grasp the idea, but have confidence in yourself to do it on your on.
Sure you can go to an “expert’ and use what they had to say as your explanation, but then the essay is taking command over you instead. To gain control over complex material one might follow a process called “reading with and against the grain’ which is introduced by Bartholomae and Petrosky (p. 10).
This type of reading requires a different style of thought and a more difficult, detailed analysis of the text. To “read with the grain’ is to comply with the authors beliefs, see it through their pion t of view, take control of the text.
While “reading against the grain’ is to be judgemental of the authors work, to ask questions and dispute their arguments. But will this fully gain “title’ for all readers? Maybe. What would Percy and his style of academic argument think? Could Bartholomae and Petrosky be acting as the experts here; telling the readers how to read and writers how to write? Are we all experiencing a loss of “title’ unknowingly? According to Percy, “The surrender of title is so complete that it never even occurs to one to reassert title (p. 571).’ Could listening to “experts’ cause a “loss of sovereignty’ which never allows us to “reassert title’? As Percy states, “A reader may surrender sovereignty over that which has been written about, just as a consumer may surrender sovereignty over a thing which has been theorized (p. 571).’ This loss of independence is yielded to a group of particular know ers, either it be writers or tour-guides. Once something is read or heard, we believe it, and trust the source.
The Essay on Reading The Book Business Ideas Job
interest of reading this pocket book starts from the interesting book name! XE-Myth. What is it? Is that only for the people who already owned their business? How can I apply them into my work and improve my working performance in a big multinational company? Is that really relevant to me at my current stage since I am still working for someone else and do not have any business of myself? Those ...
It is normal to give our beliefs to the “experts’ and utilize their information, but Percy disagrees. If we look at the educational experience through Percy’s ideas, how would one gain knowledge in a subject? The teachers are so called “experts’, who according to Percy cannot fulfill the necessities of the student. “For their is nothing the educator can do to provide for this need of the student,’ words Percy (577).
This means that the reader is in a struggle to gain “titile’ over complex material. But according to Bartholomae and Petrosky, their ways of reading can help the student in regaining control of a text.
Its up to the reader to make sense of what is being said, and this acknowledgement is the starting point for the writer. They state, “, , , to put others’ ideas into your terms, to provide your account of what they are saying. This is a way of getting a tentative or provisional hold on a text, , , (B&P p. 11).’ We need to impose things in our aspects, as well as viewing someone else’s, so we can understand and fully grasp what is being read. In conclusion, critical reading is a process the reader should employ to become a stronger, more angled reader. By angled I mean a different analysis than normally used.
The Essay on Poverty What Makes People Poor
The rich, the middle class, and the poor; are described by the way we live and the amount of money one has. There are many different ways of describing what poverty is, whether it is by how you live, how much money you have, or in statistical terms. Poverty isnt always a bad thing it is just another way of living, another way of life. There are different kinds of poverty that you can measure. ...
You make a mark on a book and it makes a mark on you. One can not read something and expect the piece, or its author, to just say what the essay was about and what it meant. One has to think analytically and interpret its ideas and concepts through what they believe it all means. Which will then administer the satisfaction to the reader, without “loss of sovereignty’, and maybe even the fortune of becoming an expert reader. Sure there are the difficulties one might experience coming across certain encounters. But one does not need other opinions and ideas to state how they feel something is.
Do people forget they have an opinion and a thought process that can do the explaining? Although I do not fully agree with Percy and his view of the academic society, his ideas of “experts’ and the “complex man’ play a big role in todays society. Allowing more and more people to gradually become independent, and drifting away from the social groups they were once a part of. People need to start being more independent in their reading and interpreting, as well as their daily lives.
