No body of government truly has a truly perfect image in the U. S. , but in particular is the congress. There are quite a few theories as to why Congress has a bad public image. Congress may have a poor public image but if it weren’t for it’s own members speaking ill of the institution then the image problem could easily be fixed.
I think one of the main reasons why Congress has a poor public image is because its members often times criticize it. Many congressional candidates run on the idea that they are going to get into congress, fix it, and make it work. How is the public supposed to be satisfied with an institution that isn’t even accepted by its own members? I don’t blame the public for having a bad image of the Congress. Most citizens only pay attention to politics with the minimum effort; what they see on TV or what they read on the front page of the paper.
Congressmen don’t usually go around praising Congress and even if they did, the media doesn’t find that interesting and will ignore it. Therefore, the people only believe what they are presented. Another element to this issue would be Congress’ very public decision making process. As Davidson and Oleszek wrote “if a representative or senator sounds ill-informed or advances an outrageous proposal… the representatives of the media are likely to stress the…
The Essay on The Library Of Congress
HISTORY The Library of congress was established by an act of congress on April 24, 1800. It was originally housed in the United States capitol. The collection, which stared out small at 740 volumes, slowly increased to over 3,000 volumes by 1814. That year, though, the British along with the capitol burned those books during the assault on Washington. To rapidly replace the collection, Thomas ...
event rather than the substance of the overall debate.” This is very true because when congress discusses issues, it is broadcast on CSP AN and covered by journalists. On the contrary, the inner workings of the executive branch and the judicial branch are kept very private most of the time. Again, all the people are being presented with is biased information so that is all they have of which to form an opinion. This particular example is not Congress’ fault however. They have no control over how the media portrays them.
Congressmen are human and if they make a mistake while addressing their peers, it should not become an addition to the list of reasons to hate congress. Davidson and Oleszek also mentioned the fact that there is no single spokesperson for Congress as a whole. I completely agree with this because it allows the people to have one person to address instead of searching around and hearing from many different people. Davidson and Oleszek write, “While the President can communicate quickly to the American people concerning his goals and programs Congress lacks such capabilities.” Because Congress is many people without a single representative, it can appear scattered and disorganized.
It also makes communicating with the people difficult and inefficient, especially when each member is also working to benefit their state in addition to the country as a whole. If Congress did not criticize itself, I would say that their bad public image is not deserved. However, for lack of a better phrase, they brought it on themselves. I am sure that the members of Congress do not like the public image that they have. Therefore, they need to be doing something about it. They need to work on speaking to the public themselves and letting them know what is going on.
They need to work on battling the media and reclaiming their good image. They need to not run on the campaign platform of reforming Congress and then get in there and do nothing. Congress’ image should not be a poor one because they are the body for the people, elected by the people and the people should think highly of those they elected.
