Shay’s Rebellion debate I support Shay’s rebellion. I believe that the problems of the farmers far outweigh the arguments against the rebellion. First of all, the economic crisis was ravaging the west, and some farmers did not even have a single months pay in their possession. Due to this, farmers had to sell most of their things for prices under their actual value. As they saw a brother, father or cousin haled to debtors’ court, charged high legal fees, and threatened with prison, the free farmers of western and central Massachusetts feared they would be reduced to the status of tenant farmers.
To exacerbate their indignation was the fact that many of them were soldiers that had fought in the Revolution. I can understand why these farmers felt ill-treated; after all, they had exhibited their support for their country, and their government did not reciprocate this support. These men repeatedly petitioned at courts and tried various other means of expressing their plight, and all methods constantly failed. The rebellion was essentially inevitable.
Also, there was an issue of stable currency. The rebels wanted a glad-backed currency, as compared to the paper money that the government had begun to issue. States had a variety of different paper monies in circulation, but not much of this money was honored at face value. So, obviously, the farmers lose again. Not only do they have an infinitesimal amount of money, but also that that they do have is worth little. It is understandable that they would want money that would be worth its full amount..
The Essay on The Boxer Rebellion
1. In a Tchart, list reasons for United States intervention in the Boxer Rebellion. Reasons in favor of U.S. Involvement in the Boxer Rebellion: Reasons against U.S. involvement in the Boxer Rebellion: The united state what to gain economic The united states was going to fight battle power not get into another war. that was not worth the american live 2. Write a powerful and memorable topic ...
