Referring to the case of “Fisher v. Bell”, Mr. Bell breached the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act which are consider as an offence under the definition of Criminal Law. In addition, Mr. Bell are prosecuted by Inspector George Fisher who represented the government in this case. Hence, this case should be treated as criminal case. 3. Who are the parties? Plaintiff (prosecutor): Chief Inspector George Fisher Defendant: James Charles bell ( the Bell Music retail shopkeeper) 4.
Where was the trial Proceeding held? [pic] Under the English Legal system, the magistrates court are mainly deal with most summary offences, such as traffic offences, breach of contract and common assault… etc In the case of “Fisher v. Bell”, it was held at the Magistrates court at the beginning. But the justices of Magistrates court concluded that is no offence had been committed and dismissed information in this case. Afterwards, the prosecutor are made application for appeal to the Crown court. . Which courts considered this case before the current court and what did they decide? for this case, it was held in the magistrates court before the current court. and What are the issues to be decided by the current court? Summary of the key facts that are the basis of litigation Summary of the arguments made by the plaintiff (prosecutor) Summary of the arguments made by the defendant Summary of the court’s holding Summary of the court’s reasoning Any Dicta? What is the relief granted or denied?
The Essay on Edwards V Aguillard Was A 1987 Supreme Court Case Centering
Edwards v Aguillard was a 1987 Supreme Court case centering on the constitutionality of a Louisiana statue requiring that creation science be taught along side of evolution in the public schools. Evolution remains so controversial primarily because it is part of a larger debate over nature and the meaning of life. The study of how life began almost inevitably raises questions of why: Why did life ...