fish farming is Necessary for Feeding the Population
Are fish farms really necessary for feeding the world’s population? Many people have asked this question for quite a while because there are both good and bad things about aquaculture. On the one hand, aquaculture is beneficial for the population because fish farms feed many people. On the other hand, fish farms also damage the natural population of fish. This essay would argue that although fish farms cause damage to the natural fish population, fish farms are needed due to the fact that they provide a source of food for the increasing world population.
Fish farming is beneficial for the world population. For one, fish farming increases the number of jobs in a community. This would make the economy better for the world. Second, it would feed growing world populations. Providing a new way to feed populations will reduce pressure on wildlife, since people do not have to hunt food like hunting deer or fishing wild fish. Also, fish farming could increase scientific knowledge since farmed fish could be tested for health, and used for scientific experiments. Therefore, fish farming is beneficial to the world.
Although fish farming help the human population, there are also flaws in the system. First, fish farming could amplify and transfer illness and parasites to wild fishes. Infecting the wild fish population would mean a paramedic spreading through fishes, reducing their population critically. Second, it could unbalance the population of local specimen or migrating fish since wild fish is used to create high protein food pellets. Killing local fish would damage the food chain of that community, and has a chance of ruining the life of local fishermen. Also, fish farming pollutes the water with excess nutrients, antibiotics and chemical agents. To run a fish farm, there would be fish feces, antibiotics for the fish, and chemicals to keep the water clean; however, they would toxicate the water if they pile up. Therefore, fish farming has down sides too.
The Essay on Salmon Farming Farmed Fish Pcb
Salmon Farming If you recently ordered salmon off the menu of your favorite restaurant, or purchased it from your local grocery store, chances are it was farmed. According to "Salmon of the Americas, an organization of salmon-producing companies in Canada, Chile and the United States, 70 percent of the salmon produced in British Columbia and Washington comes from salmon farms. If it weren't for ...
Fish farming does harm as well as it brings benefits; however, there is more benefits than harm in this case. First, fish farming is desperately needed to feed the population, which outweights the fact that fish could transfer illness. If there already are enough fish in fish farms, it doesn’t really matter if other fish die. Second, if farmed fish are spread to the world and everybody can eat them, there would be no need for wild fish. Besides, only little of the fish eat wild-fish pellets, and only the oil of the wild fish is used in fish pellets, owing to the fact that fish protein could be replaced by vegetable protein. Third, if scientific knowledge is heightened, it could find a way to develop non-toxic antibiotics and chemicals. Therefore, fish wouldn’t die and there would be no need to replace fish farming. Therefore, fish farming’s strengths are more important than its harms.
Fish farming could be disruptive to nature, but it is needed. First, if fish farms didn’t exist, there would be a devastating damage to economy. The latter would happen since fish farms create a lot of work, so it gets rid of jobless people, therefore boasting our community. There are many reasons that fish farming is bad, too. It’s just that the good reasons are much better than the bad ones. In conclusion, fish farming is necessary for feeding the population.
