Lauren Stewart Government 2301 December 7, 200 !GAYS IN THE MILITARY! In 1994 there was a debate at the White House, which wanted to let gays serve in the military openly, yet Congress and the military did not. The compromise protected homosexuals in uniform as long as they didnt flaunt their sexual orientation. In the eighties and nineties, gays have mobilized to seek civil rights protections from the National Government. In the United States, questions of basic civil rights and liberties are often considered first by the President and then by Congress. They are usually thought to respond to the opinions and prejudices of the public because they have to defend their policies to voters during their reelection campaigns. Research shows the general public does not support basic civil liberties for social groups with unpopular views. Therefore, it is not surprising that elected officials are hesitant to respond to demands by unpopular minorities for civil rights protection.
Is it right for gays to be in the military? There are many issues concerning gays in the military. According to the Constitution, is it wrong to persecute or discriminate someone because of their sexual status ? And whatever happened to the moral aspects our forefathers built this nation First of all, according to our freedoms given by the Constitution, is it right to discriminate gays in the military? This is one of the key issues, if not the most significant, in balancing social and functional imperatives. We all know, even under present circumstances homosexuals serve in all militaries, but how and in what Conditions do they do so, and what happens when their homosexuality becomes revealed? Decriminalize homosexuality but continue to argue that it is incompatible with military service. Which in my opinion IT IS! If you are found out about or you Come Out of the Closet, You will be administratively discharged. According to the Constitution, I do believe it is wrong to discharge or harass a person due to their sexual status, according to the Constitution it is discrimination. We are supposed to have freedom of speech, free practice of religion, and nowhere does it say NO GAYS! Yet why are the gays so socially unacceptable when it comes to the military or defending our nation, I believe men join the service to protect our country, and I also believe that if a gay man wants to serve and fight for his country then he should have that right. Yet on the other hand, I still find myself resorting back to the moral issue. I also dont believe any straight man in his right mind would feel comfortable knowing he was sharing a bunk with a homosexual and thats putting it nicely.
The Term Paper on When You Hear The Word gay What Do You Think Of Happy Doubtfully
When you hear the word 'gay,' what do you think of? Happy? Doubtfully? Something stupid or dumb? Most likely. In today's culture, gay is a common adjective for something undesirable or stupid. I hear this word used in such a way countless times daily. Homosexuals have never seemed to be a widely accepted group in America. Many people are still disgusted by the fact that there are such people in ...
Men I know that have served in the military say they are afraid to even have a gay man in their group because of what would happen if they were to be hit on. I dont feel men in our service, protecting our rights and freedoms could operate to their fullest capabilities if they did not feel comfortable with the men THEY were depending on to survive and protect them in a crisis situation. Like they say, you are only as strong as youre weakest link. Men in the military and straight men in general think homosexuality is a weakness as well as a sickness in the first place. This is just part of their culture. In turn, if a straight man can defend and fight for his country, his rights and his freedoms, why cant he be man enough to be able to defend himself and his dignity by turning the other cheek if by chance inappropriate sexual inuendos come his way. Somehow or another it always reverts back to the old moral issue of it all.
The Essay on men that kiss gay sexy japanese fat people sex busty amateur
You really need to doggy style porn been killed.Winters had been called girls who swallow damn it.That certainly sounds interfering [url=http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.info?_id=3bbb09f43c79d8e6a499cf1e69884081]nude bodybuilders [/url] him, then relaxed.James was one of free hentai movies me such questions?Connor, are you happy lesbian celebs to finish his education.She had also said nv hentai ...
If it was natural and there was truly nothing wrong with homosexuality in general, then there would be no problem from the start. When you are trying to change the military culture of a first class fighting machine in directions to which it is suspicious, you must balance the consequences of what you believe to be right and necessary on legal and moral grounds against the effects of moving too quickly on, among other things, retention and recruitment. There are no cost-free and easy answers whichever decision is taken. Secondly, the moral aspect of homosexuality in the military and anywhere else for that matter. In modern representation of gays, elements of 3 different epistemological systems of representation can be seen functioning within public policy texts. These 3 systems are: the Judaeo-Christian prohibitions of sodomy as an act contrary to nature; the late nineteenth century medical discovery of homosexuality(a term invented by the same medical establishment that would prescribe its treatment and cure); and the psychiatric, psychological, and developmental models of homosexuality that emerged in the twentieth century. -These ways of understanding sex – were produced by practitioners of institutions, combining practitioners, institutions, and epistemology in a common effort : the production of the truth.
It is important to keep in mind that the intersection among epistemology, the institutions of its production, and the state shifts over time. As each shift occurs, the new discourse of authority never succeeds completely in replacing earlier ones. Even as new social institutions replace older ones as the interpreter of truth and the language of authority, older explanations are never completely wiped out and forgotten about. But who has the truth? For example, for many centuries it was the Catholic Church that controlled the production of knowledge and truth about the purpose and intention of sexual acts. Procreation was the aim and goal of all sexual acts in the epistemological system. In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, medical science supplanted the religions monopoly on the truth about sexual acts, yet the moral authority of the Churchs pronouncements never completely ceased. The issue of homosexuality and military service provides a perfect opportunity to examine how widely spread these constructions of homosexuality have become.
The Essay on Homosexuality in the military
Throughout the years of the United States military, gays and lesbians has been banned from serving openly. In 1993 Congress passed the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell law which mandated the discharge of openly gay, lesbian, or bisexual service members. (https://www.sldn.org). They were not allowed to participate in any type of homosexual activities or speak of their sexuality. This is a direct violation of ...
When I think of gays trying to find equal rights in the military, it reminds me of Bill Clintons failed attempt to allow gays to serve openly, which took effect not too long after he was elected and took office in 1993. As I said before, the defense of a country has been considered a defining characteristic of citizenship. Also, the provision of a common defense is one of the general principles in the preamble to the United States Constitution which explains exactly why a government is needed and desired. If I called the shots it would be a very prejudice nation according to most people. Gays would not be allowed in the military, nor would they be permitted to marry or adopt children. It might not state in the Constitution No Gays Permitted, but it does in the Holy Bible.
I believe homosexuality is an unnatural act against God. Plain and simple. I believe the only reason you marry in the first place is to become one before God. It clearly states in the Bible there will be no homosexuality tolerated, therefore, homosexuals can not become one before God. Its wrong and unnatural. Why should it be tolerated in the United States Military? Wrong is Wrong! It totally defies the laws of nature.
If we claim to be one nation under God then its His laws we are supposed to go by, not just when its convenient. Just as Alexis de Toqueville stated: It is therefore of immense importance to men to have fixed ideas about God, their souls, and their fellows, for doubt of these FIRST principles would leave all their actions to chance and condemn them, more or less to anarchy and impotence. And by Gary Amos: America is a covenant nation. Our declaration of Independence is a charter which acknowledges God as Sovereign over these United States and our Constitution is a federal or covenantal constitution. For the first time in our history the leadership of all three branches of our federal government will apparently be willfully and philosophically turning away from the covenantal vision and biblical principles of our founders. Edited by: Col. Ronald D.
The Essay on Should allow gay in military
Specific Purpose: to persuade my audience that we should allowed gay in military because not only straight that have enough potential to serve openly in military Central Idea: Many people in US disagree that president Obama will allow homosexual serving openly in uniform; however, every should have their rights to do what they want if it not harm others and don’t have to change who they are just ...
Ray, USMCR 3.Dont Ask, Dont Tell, and Dont Pursue Edited by: Dandecker, Christopher 5.Gays dont rely on, dont ask, dont tell.
