HUMAN CLONING The American public has been a haven of open scientific inquiry and it has always been a factor in creating globally accepted innovations in biotechnology and medicine. As the country is beset by several debilitating diseases such as cancer, Alzheimers disease, Parkinsons disease and diabetes, the medical community struggles to find a solution for these chronic and fatal diseases as each day goes by. Ironically, the potential solution in which they have stumbled upon is contested. This destroys another life in order to accomplish it. In a similar manner, sports corporations are so competitive that the idea of producing perfect athletes is not a far-fetched idea. It is here where the idea of human cloning and stem cell research has been widely and hotly debated issue (Human Stem Cell Research).
The process takes the human embryo cells, which have been deemed by the National Institute of Health as having greater developmental potential as opposed to adult stem cells. Essentially, in order for one to have a so-called stem embryonic stem Cell Research">cell research line, it would translate to the destruction of a human embryo. In the legislative realm, that is where the clash of opinion begins. In passing a bill that allows stem cell research to continue, a written consent of the person who is allowing the use of embryonic fetal tissue needs to be done. The bill that must be passed must explicitly say that the research involving the derivation and use of human embryonic stem cells, human embryonic germ cells, and human adult stem cells from any source, including somatic cell nuclear transplantation shall be permitted. For example, in the state of Hawaii it distinctly provides several provisions for this research and some of these conditions require first and foremost the review and approval of an institutional review board. There must also be a guideline that states that the physician that is delivering fertility treatment would inform the patient well enough to make a voluntary and knowledgeable decision regarding the disposition of the human embryos. The physician is also mandated to give the option of storing, discarding or donating them to any individual or any research.
The Research paper on Animal Experimentation Animals Humans Research
Animal Experimentation Stopped BAD Animal Experimentation Stopped Essay, Research Paper BAD SCIENCE Why is a practice responsible for so many billion innocent lives still in affect in America today despite its many negative aspects? Animal experimentation, formerly known by the Greek word vivisection, referred to the dissection of living animals for experimental purposes. Recently the term has ...
The advantage of this particular bill is that it does not completely shut out the possibility of using stem cell research in order to further scientific and medical progress. Should there be any chance that a substantial contribution to the scientific community of stem cell research be added, it could come from this state which allows the opportunity to further look into this field of medicine. What is good about allowing this type of research to thrive is that it will bring science and medicine closer to overcoming the different deadly diseases that have plagued mankind for so long. In contrast, one distinct disadvantage of this bill is that it directly goes against the different ethical standards of several people. The bill automatically puts two fronts against each other by raising several ethical questions about the destruction of human embryos which are essentially believed by loyalists to be human life already. This bill however may be one of the very first bills that the state of Hawaii may pass in order to come closer to a full-blown campaign for stem cell research. Since the state has allowed a voluntary manner in which individuals have control over the disposition of the human embryos.
The Essay on Fetal Tissue Cells Research Stem
Amniotic Tissue Research: Is The Moral Cost Amniotic Tissue Research: Is The Moral Cost Too High To Ignore? It seems that there is always new groundbreaking technology introduced into society. Our hope is to find some magical chemical that will cure all diseases or cancer. Imagine that a miracle substance was found but came, at what some may think is to high a price. Amniotic tissue is remarkable ...
Further tests may warrant the mandatory use of human embryos after delivering fertility treatment, thus nullifying any choice that the individual may have (McFeatters 2005).
Currently there are several new implications that require further bills to be passed. There are new breakthroughs that are challenging the ethical standards. Some states are now debating as to whether embryos should be created rather than collected from fertility clinics. These are the current problems that affect the House of the United States where they are carefully considering the implications, both medical and ethical, of allowing such procedure to continue. It would involve creating embryos specifically for research rather than relying on those left over from fertility clinics, Travaglini spokeswoman Ann Dufresne said.
(Macone, 2005) Although President Bush has passionately objected to the passing of the bill agreeing to further stem cell research, the House has not sided with him as it has voted for stem cell research on occasion. The different bills that have been passed in the government are now apparently being carefully scrutinized by the House and the Senate and it seems that both are in favor of stem cell research as it did in March of 2005. Boston.com reported that State senators overwhelmingly approved a measure yesterday promoting embryonic stem cell research in Massachusetts, dealing a defeat to Governor Mitt Romney by endorsing a research technique that involves the cloning of human cells. (Greenberger, 2005) There are other problems aside from the ethical barrier. The proper chemical signals to direct stem cells to turn into the cells one wants are unknown. This is certainly the end goal of research.
Meanwhile, the issue on the stem cell will continue to be a highly-charged one. Researchers will have to deal with this for a long time. References Human Stem Cell Research. S.B. No. 1351.
A Bill for an Act. The Senate Twenty-Third Legislature 2005. State of Hawaii. Accessed 9 July 2006. http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2005/bills/sb 1351_.htm Macone, S. 2005. Accessed 9 July 2006 at: http://www.dailyfreepress.com/media/paper87/news/2 005/02/15/News/Stem- Cell.Bill.Debated-864635.shtml McFeatters, A. ( May 2005).
A Persuasive Essay For The Use Of Stem Cells For Research
Many people have not been fully informed on the topic of human pluripotent stem cell research. Most American have heard a lot on one side, and very little on the other. Hence, they have not and can not fully evaluate the facts and can only give snap decisions, according to religioustolerance.com. Having heard extensive lectures on both sides, I believe that embryonic stem cell research shows great ...
Despite veto threat, House OKs stem cell work. Post- Gazette National Bureau. Accessed 9 July 2006 at: http://www.postgazette.com/pg/05145/509887.stm Greenberger, S. (March 31, 2005).
Senate OKs research on stem cells. Globe Staff.
Accessed 9 July 2006 at: http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2005/0 3/31/senate_oks_research_on_stem_cells_1112252722/.
