Human Cloning: Are You For or Against It? In today’s society there are many new technological advances in science that have allowed us as humans to recreate some of life’s essentials, people and animals. In the new modern age of science there has been much controversy over this sensitive subject. For example, why should anyone have the right to clone another human being for their own benefit? Or perhaps even on animals? Others may argue that human cloning should be used in order to better ones life. I look at it as god creates everyone to be a certain way, if he wanted there to be clones of everything, he would have made everything the same. I truly believe that there are certain fields of cloning that may actually better our world as a whole. It is our job as a society to decide which type of cloning is right and which type of cloning is wrong.
When the topic of cloning is brought up during a conversation there are always going to be some raised eyebrows. Most people associate cloning with humans, and that is why there are way more people against the practice of cloning then there is for it. What people need to take into consideration is that cloning can be used to save things instead of always enhancing them. “Scientists will most likely find a way to save endangered species using the benefits of cloning. Our national bird has always been one to make us all proud.
The Term Paper on Brave New World Cloning Human People
... and the male the genetic information (Human Cloning). Reasons why people want cloning, are diverse and the people themselves, such as: Recover someone who was ... of a future without males (Human Cloning). In May of 1997, President Clinton did little to ease peoples fears. He announced A ban ...
Its beauty and majestic character makes it a shame that it is almost an endangered species” (Malcolm 12) This is only one of many cases that can be argued. If we look at things this way I’m sure that there will be a significant amount of people that would change their minds and views on cloning. Human cloning on the other hand is a much more delicate topic than the cloning of animals. I know when I hear the phrase “human cloning” it makes me think of stubbornness and selfishness. Maybe that’s because I haven’t fully learned, or understood all the benefits of human cloning, and just choose to point out all of the negatives. I have to believe that the reason why most people object to the idea of cloning has to be because they assume stubbornness in most cases.
Human cloning can be a treatment for infertility. That alone should standout in the eyes of many to encourage the practice rather than discourage it. Infertility is caused mainly by genetic defects, so it’s not like the women made a bad choice to inherit this defect, it was genetically given to her. If Cloning could give women higher percentages to have babies, then why not allow this? Another strong point that has been pushed over the years to try and allow human cloning is cloning technology. “Cloning technology can help “perfect” gene therapy, the actual correction or replacement of defective gene sequences. Gene therapy is currently limited because of inefficient vectors, or viruses that convey new genes into cells” (Lovell).
Due to the inefficient positive outcome of this, the only way to enhance gene therapy is to allow this new technology of cloning. “Cloning technology would allow scientists to take a cell that had its genome modified and use it to produce an offspring. The resulting child and its descendants would carry the corrected gene in every cell” (Lovell) If you look at these positives influences that human cloning can produce then is human cloning in today’s society really that bad? Is cloning really a good thing or do some people just make it out to be that way? Recent studies show that the animal rights groups are outraged with the idea of testing animals for cloning. They believe that any experimentation or unnecessary distress to a living animal is completely inhumane.
This protest has to be taken and considered strongly when discussing this matter. Why should anyone have the right to clone animals in order to see if it will better humans? The animal rights groups are trying to save these innocent animals from being potential science lab tests. With the idea of human cloning being debated day in and day out, The National Bioethics Advisory Commission wonders if a cloned human will be “regarded as less of a person” and treated as a scientific specimen rather than a human being. This is has been reported a sone of the most argued points against the practice of human cloning. When a clone is born, if we regard them as any less of a person than you or me, then why even clone? It is unfair to the child that is born if society doesn’t accept him the way that it should. The clone itself was not part of any decision or experiment that resulted in their cloning.
The Term Paper on Cloning Human Clone
... animal clones: a huge navel - a remnant of the oversized! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! umbilical cord that inexplicably develops during most pregnancies involving! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! clones (Weiss A 1). Cloning humans ... ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! genes are not properly reset, various abnormalities arise (Josefson 315). If people knew the real dangers of cloning, they would not want to clone. ...
How in the world can we hold them accountable for someone else’s actions? For this argument I can obviously see the controversy that it is sure to stir up. This argument alone could be the sole reason that human cloning will never be accepted as morally right in today’s society. If I had to decide right now weather or not I think cloning is morally right Im not sure that I would be able to give a straight up answer. There are so many things that can be said to allow the practice of cloning as well as forbid it in its entirety. I truly believe however, that society as a whole can benefit more from human cloning than it can without it. Sure there are always going to be people that come up with new things why we should not clone, but if you look at the big picture, in reality more people are going to gain from human cloning than lose.
One of my favorite arguments in favor of human cloning is the production of more geniuses. These clones will have their own soul and identity like any other human being. They will be “a distinct individual; not a replica of another person. Each clone would be like an identical twin”, claims James Q. Wilson, “very similar in intelligence and manner, and alike but definitely not a duplicate in personality” (Tae 1).
If this is the case and we are able to create these intelligent human beings, then I don’t see why we shouldn’t.
It’s not going to hurt anyone if there are wiser people living amongst us. It will potentially make our country, as well as our world a better place to live. Also, if one is to tell me that a potential infertile woman is more likely going to be able to have children, then what exactly are we arguing about? There is no selfishness involved here. A woman inherits this disorder and there is nothing that she can do to prevent it. If we as a society can use cloning to our advantage, and try and prevent these kinds of disorders from happening in the future, I see no reason for anyone to hold us back from doing it. The only selfish people involves are the people against cloning.
The Essay on Effects Of Evolution On Human Society
Effects of Evolution on Human Society The basic law of Darwinist concept of evolution is that simpler forms of life evolve into organisms that are more complex. If we look at social progress, it will appear that it follows the same pattern - from slavery to feudalism and from feudalism to capitalism. Now we live at the beginning of post-industrial era. Therefore, we can say that biological and ...
In The Myths We Live By, Mary Midgley expresses her feelings through a bit of anger. Midgley believes that the idea of cloning is a bad one. She understands that it is an ongoing experiment in society, but it is something that we need to be careful with because there are morals to be broken and consequences to be paid. “It is often hard to consider probable consequences on their own, since we really do not know what they are likely to be” (Midgley 102).
MIdgley is explaining here that cloning is a risk and there will definitely be some sort of consequence. If we keep pursuing this practice, the results may not always be the ones we are necessarily looking for. Human Cloning in today’s society is obviously an on going experiment as well as a heavily debated topic. There are many reasons that Cloning should be banned as wells as legalized. I for one have changed my opinion on the topic several times since first learning about the assignment.
At first when I heard the word cloning I was completely against the entire idea of it. That was until I actually spent time researching about the topic, and learned many interesting facts about it. Good facts, as well as the negative ones that throw people off the subject entirely. The fact that Cloning could potentially cure diseases and make our society a better and safer place to live then why is anyone asking questions or having doubts about it? We need to realize the positives in the situation because they are way more overwhelming then the negatives coming out of it. As soon as people begin to realize the need for cloning, then the world will become a better place to live, and we will be worrying about less things and enjoying more of the richness in life.
The Essay on Cloning 2
HUMAN CLONING Human cloning is not a controversial topic; the public regards it as inappropriate. However, other forms of genetic engineering are controversial. These other forms need special consideration. Human cloning is a form of genetic engineering and it is very similar to genetic engineering. In my opinion, some forms of human cloning should be allowed. Human cloning means designer people ...
