Cloning is a subject that is attracting more and more attention. As scientists develop more sophisticated methods, the debate rages on: should human cloning be allowed? With this question, the battle lines are not as firm as either side would like. There are more than two sides to this issue. Some groups are in favor of some types of cloning and against others, some groups are pro cloning, but only for certain uses, and yet other groups are for / against it entirely.
Why the controversy? I think it’s mainly because of fear. Cloning could be used for good or evil, but so could almost anything else. I believe that with the proper laws regulating it, the benefits massively outweigh the risks. One of the main arguments against human cloning is of human uniqueness. One thing we as a race treasure is our uniqueness, the fact that there is no one quite like us.
Many people think cloning would change that; there could be other people that are exactly like us. This is, of course, not the case. Take identical twins for example. They may look alike, but their personalities are much different.
They can be as different as anyone else, even though they have the same DNA. Who we are is not determined exclusively by our DNA, this is not what makes us unique. Our experiences are what also make us different from each other. There is absolutely no way to create two people that would be identical in every way, because they would always have different experiences.
These experiences can produce such fundamental changes in humans that two clones, identical as far as DNA goes, could have totally different values, simply based on how they were raised or where they went to school. Another main concern with human cloning is how the clones would be treated. Would they be given the same rights as other humans? This argument really makes no sense to me. The clones would be human; they would be the same as any other person. Children born from artificial insemination are considered human, so why would clones not be? I think we as humans have learned enough about human rights to know that all people really are created equal, and we would not have to go through a “clone’s rights” argument. Humans are more mature than that.
The Term Paper on Human Cloning Clone People Clones
... that clones of distinguished people are not living up to the reputations of their predecessors, then the incentive for human cloning will ... traits are genetically determined. Of course a person's life experience has a major impact on their personality, interests, and ... crime? Clint Eastwood The same argument applies to sports stars. For example, people have suggested cloning Michael Jordan, the super ...
Cloning is just another method of reproduction, which eventually could be considered just as natural as any other method. The benefits of cloning are much more numerous than the arguments against it. There are huge waiting lists for organ transplants. An organ must be compatible in order to have a successful transplant. Cloning organs could solve this problem. Would you turn down a cloned organ if it could save your life? Another example of a benefit is this: Imagine if you were sterile, for one reason or another.
I think it would be horrible to know that no matter what you did, you would never be able to reproduce, or to have a child to raise and love. Cloning could solve this problem. There are many people out there that would love to be able to reproduce no matter what the cost. Prohibiting cloning would restrict research in this subject, research that could lead to countless spin-off discoveries; which that could benefit us greatly. Things like genetic engineering could be greatly improved by cloning. Cloning could increase our knowledge as a species, without it, who knows how much we are missing..
