Leadership/ Management Styles of the Presidential Candidates It is quite possible to define what America is going to turn into, as a country, after Hillary Clinton, Barak Obama or John McCain take Presidential office, by simply examining management styles, associated with their political campaigns, and by analyzing their visions of what the concept of leadership stands for. Let us begin with hysterical promoter of Liberal cause Hillary Clinton. She truly believes that the main function of American President is to run bureaucratic machine, associated with executive branch of political power in this country. According to her, President is nothing but a top manager, who simply needs to make sure that enough money is being collected from taxpayers, in order to provide welfare for the hordes of illegal aliens, whose relatives promised to vote for Clinton. Despite the fact that in her speeches Clinton pledges democratic values, her act betrays her as believing in totally opposite principles of governing, because, even within her own party, she strives for actually being in full control of different aspects of political activity, associated with popularizing Democratic agenda.
Just as any typical Liberal, Clinton believes that she is fully qualified of telling people how to live their lives, which is why we can conclude that if she is going be elected as President, the bureaucracy in this country will gain a fully independent status, because governments officials are going to be regarded as guardians of politically correct morality rather then peoples servants. In her interview to Bloomberg on January 16, 2008, Clinton admitted that her vision of effective President involves American National Leader personally supervising the professional adequacy of every particular bureaucrat on different levels of executive power: I think you have to be able to manage and run the bureaucracy. Thus, if Clinton will be elected as President, she is going to be bugged down in dealing with petty issues, whereas designing countrys socio-political and foreign policies will be delegated to countless experts, who will try to adjust the objective reality to the obscure ideology of neo-Liberalism.
... presidents in dealing with foreign affairs. Clinton had visited more countries in his term then any other previous president. In 1996, President Bill Clinton ... Jim. (1992). Clinton: Young Man in a Hurry. Texas: Summit Tyrrell, Emmett. (1996). Boy Clinton: The political Biography. Washington D. ... times. In the middle of all this political excitement, Clinton was falling deeply in love. While attending ...
As result, this country will be deprived of the remains of its national integrity. Despite the fact that Barak Obama belongs to the same political party as Clinton, his vision of political management makes much more sense. In his interview to Bloomberg, on the same date, he said: Im not an operating officer. Some in this debate around experience seem to think the job of the President is to go in and run some bureaucracy. Well, thats not my job. My job is to set a vision of heres where the bureaucracy needs to go. Barak is known to be able to pick very effective aids, which helped him immensely, during the course of his campaign. This points out to the fact that, despite his young age and dubious racial affiliation, Barak is quite aware of the classical principles of governing, of which Clinton appears to have no clue whatsoever.
He knows that it is not up to President to supervise the functioning of governmental officials, because he has other priorities. If bureaucrat proves to be professionally inadequate, he simply needs to be fired. So far, this country does not experience the shortage of different experts, such as lawyers or psychologists, who often get paid as much as $500 an hour for simply yapping away. At the same time, it is very unlikely that Obama will stick to his vision of political management, if elected, because Democratic Party has long ago ceased to represent the interests of ordinary working Americans and now is being strongly associated with protection of welfare recipients civil rights. In its turn, it implies a strong link with governmental bureaucracy, on the part of this party. Therefore, if Obama, as President, will dare to tell the bureaucracy where to go, he will be promptly reminded of unsightly facts from his own biography, which can be made known to Medias at any moment.
... to restrict democratic freedoms and to promote dictatorship and political isolation. Unfortunately, Obama’s opponents forget that “if the U. S. ... between the two countries, this Obama’s decision is likely to cause a strategic political and economic change. Statistics suggests ... residing in Cuba with financial support. Now, the new American President has come to fulfill one of his major promises – ...
It appears that if Obama is to be elected as President, he will try his best to provide this country with effective leadership, but it is doubtful that he will able to succeed, given the fact that is subjected to racially motivated political lobbyism. Nevertheless, comparing to Clinton, Obama appears in much more favorable light, when it comes to discussing the principles of political and economic leadership. It would not be exaggeration to say that John McCain suits the best for the job of President, not because of his political beliefs, but because he knows what the concept of effective leadership stands for and that he was able to practice it under the most extreme circumstances. In his article McCain Says Leadership Trumps Management Skills, Holly Ramer quotes McCain who said: I spent 22 years in the United States Navy. I led – not managed – I led the largest squadron in the United State Navy I’ll put my leadership – not management – but leadership credentials up against anybody’s(Ramer).
This quotation provides us with the insight on McCain existential philosophy. He knows that, in order to qualify for the position of President, the potential candidate must be a charismatic individual and not just someone who had spend a good half of its life sorting out papers in the office.
In order for the President to be able to effectively manage the country, he must know how to mobilize its inner potential, in regards to human recourses. This can only be achieved if President knows how to insure the implementation of his directives with his glance alone. McCain insisted, on numerous occasions, that Presidents managerial talent consists in his ability to choose in favor of professional and trustworthy aids, who will deal with practical aspects of President executing his duties. Thus, we can say that McCains ideas, in regards to the concept of political leadership, sound similar to the ideas of Barak Obama. However, unlike Obama, McCain is actually in position of sticking up to his promises of bringing the notion of sanity back into American politics. It is not by pure chance that McCain considers Ronald Reagan as one of American greatest Presidents.
... America being ready for a Black president emerge. As with the pros and cons, Obama’s political agendas are not any different from ... country of America, if he or she would be elected President. Obama being black however rouses more questions instead of sympathies for ... participate in crucial decisions such as the selection of national leadership in a manner which reflects the “interests” of Black ( ...
Apparently, McCain views extensive life experiences, wiseness and personal charisma as indispensable qualities, on the part of potential candidate for President, because without them, President will be unable to inspire respect in those who are supposed to implement his orders. Therefore, if McCain is to be elected as President, many contemporary politicians, who find it appropriate, speaking at gatherings of illegal immigrants, will find themselves behind bars. This will initiate the beginning of effective political management in America..