In India there are various religions and casts, so parliamentary government is not as effective in India as in England. Now a days due to the current type of government many regional political powers are rising which is very harmful for our nation. I strongly support presidential rule. The president must be elected by the people of India, and a face which is well known to all should be given the power because if the people are aware of the character and the nature of the nominated persons then it would be better to elect the best one.
When you compare two systems: one that provides clarity to the voters about who they are electing to be their leader and what their policies are, against the second where confusion reins supreme, which one would you prefer?
A distinct advantages for India, if it goes for presidential system would be that the states will have elected governors. An elected governor is a powerful figure. He would bring stability in states which generally face political ups and downs and where the chief ministers do not last in office for long. A Governor; if elected for five years will be expected to remain in office for the whole term. He will therefore be able to initiate and implement the development programmes without interruption and state will stand to benefit.
Traditionally, there have been three criticisms of the presidential form of government: the president can assume dictatorial powers; the executive is not responsible to the directly elected legislature; and finally, if the president belongs to one party and the legislature is controlled by another party, it can lead to conflict and paralysis.
The Essay on State government outline
The state government of Georgia is the United States governmental body established by the Georgia State Constitution. Georgia is a republican form of government with three branches legislative, executive and judiciary. The Georgia general assembly is the state legislature of the state of Georgia. It is bicameral consisting of the senate and the House of Representatives, The general assembly’s 236 ...
Each of these criticisms can be dealt with. As the US experience has shown, there are definite checks and balances in the presidential system. Scarred by his run-ins with the Republican-controlled Congress, Obama is known to have expressed surprise at the limits imposed on the power of the president. Second, does anyone in India really believe that accountability to parliament is helping the executive perform better? As a matter of fact, straightforward administrative decisions like allowing foreign investment in retail had been held back because the executive is a hostage of parliament. And as the parliament has demonstrated, even if the government has a majority in the house, paralysis can still prevail.
The benefits of a presidential system are compelling and far outweigh the negatives, particularly in the current Indian context.
Firstly, it will force political parties to be more democratic and robust. All political parties will have to chose their best candidates as there will be a direct head-to-head contest. The people will not accept anyone less. There will be no alternate power centres, no remote controls, and no backseat drivers. Those not in the magic circle will get an opportunity.
Secondly, the voters will know their candidates intimately. Obama has been president for the last four years and will be judged by his track record. But his opponent, Romney, has also been through a tough challenges, and as presidential candidate the spotlight is firmly on him. From his religious beliefs to his refusal to disclose his tax returns to his wealthy funders, its all there in the open. The electorate has enough data to take calls on their candidates
Also, the president will be fully in charge of the executive. He will be able to attract the best and brightest to his cabinet, irrespective of their political background. They will serve at his pleasure and be accountable to him. He wont have to fix quotas for allies or give important positions to senior but incompetent leaders. Nor will he have to waste time thinking about their loyalty.
The Essay on John Adams 2 President House Candidate
The only President who was the son of a President, John Quincy Adams in many respects paralleled the career as well as the temperament and viewpoints of his illustrious father. Born in Braintree, Massachusetts, in 1767, he watched the Battle of Bunker Hill from the top of Penn's Hill above the family farm. As secretary to his father in Europe, he became an accomplished linguist and assiduous ...
Also, the government will be stable. The president will be elected by the people and will be voted out by them. He will not have to appease unreasonable allies and indulge in compromises all the time.
The job of parliament is to pass laws. But opposition law-makers have begun to believe their duty is to bring down the government. Once that power is taken away from them, it will bring them back to their primary task of discussing bills and passing laws that will improve the lot of the people.
Finally, it will truly engage the electorate with the democratic process. Think of a presidential election between Rahul Gandhi andNarendra Modi. Or even P Chidambaram versus Arun Jaitley. These will be high-voltage, fascinating contests.
