Andrew Johnson took office after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln in 1865. He was a Southern Democrat from Tennessee, when he became president, the Civil War had ended and reconstruction was in its beginning stages. Johnson was then faced with the same problems Lincoln had — the challenge of mending a broken nation, yet there was a definite difference in the ways Johnson and Lincoln approached the problems of Reconstruction. Johnson was not one of our best or brightest presidents, he did not care about his public appearance and he was not good at making decisions. One of the most illogical decisions Johnson made as president was to start a new reconstruction plan, before his death Lincoln already had a plan set out. Yet Johnson blatantly ignored the original reconstruction plan and that was when he began to experience abhorrence from both the Northerners and the Southerners which led to his impeachment.
His impeachment, in May 1868, was because of his violation of the Tenure of office Act but it was mainly about the nation’s loathing for the president. After the civil war the country was spilt down the middle, the country needed reconstruction to mend it back together but the idea of reconstruction was easier said than done. Lincoln was the first man to begin reconstruction and he began it fervently with many great ideas and compromises to the important issues such as what to do with the newly freed slaves, if he should punish the south and if so to what extent and who should be in charge of Reconstruction the executive branch or congress. Lincoln understood the great opportunities Reconstruction could offer, if he was not assonate d in 1865, then maybe Reconstruction would not have been an opportunity lost.
The Essay on Civil War Reconstruction Congress South President
... soft-on-south reconstruction plan while congress believed that the south should be economically, socially, and politically reconstructed. Both President Lincoln and President Johnson both believed ... congress attempted to socially reform the south. The reconstruction plan for the President and the reconstruction plan for Congress resulted in the two of them ...
After it was passed down to the hands of Andrew Johnson, Lincoln’s vice president, Reconstruction took a turn for the worst. Andrew Johnson was the exact opposite of Lincoln he did not care about his public appearance or about what the public wanted and was extremely stubborn which eventually led to his impeachment in 1868. Due to his poor leadership skills the opportunity of change presented to us through Reconstruction was lost forever. Andrew Johnson was inaugurated in after Lincoln’s death and was not a popular with the people.
Johnson had a real problems with alcohol, he showed up drunk to Lincoln’s second inauguration. This showed the people how much he didn’t care about his image and that he did not take his job very seriously. This was not a good idea for Johnson because he already had a lot of enemies because he was a radical democrat from the South. The south loathed him because he was a democrat and the North loathed him due to his lenient treatment of the South. The North wanted to deal with the South brutality yet Johnson handed out many pardons to the Confederates, pushed to restore civilian control in the Southern states and shied away from implementing voting rights for blacks.
From the beginning, Johnson was at odds with the Radical Republicans, who favored radical reconstruction of the defeated Southern states, including military rule and distribution of both land and voting rights to blacks. Later these same people voted to impeach him. Johnson believed that the government should be indulgent with the Southerners. Since that is how he felt he took the insinuative to make a proclamation of amnesty in May 1865, without giving the public any say in the matter. This angered a lot of Democrats and Northerners who felt that the South should not just be pardoned that they should be reprimanded. Then Johnson took it a step further by not only pardoning all of the southerners but, allowing them to have and form their own new governments.
The Essay on Impeachment Of Andrew Johnson President Vote
One man's bullet would force him into the presidency, and but for one man's vote he would have been forced out. Like the impeachment of President Clinton, the impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson in 1868 also ended in an acquittal. And like President Clinton, Johnson was a Democratic president who faced a Republican-controlled Congress. And while many were hostile to him for his political ...
This allowed the south to have ex-confederate leaders to hold spaces in the senate, for example, Senator Alexander H. Stephens who was the vice president of the Confederacy. At this point a lot of people were tried of Johnson as there president. There were many complaints about the way he did he’s job such as his generous pardon of power and his complete lack of care of the public. In 1867, the Tenure of Office Act was made against the presidents will he vetoed it but congress overruled. This act required that the president to get the Senate’s permission to remove any officeholder whose appointment it had to confirm.
His act was mainly put in to keep the Secretary of War Edwin Stanton in office. This was so important because Republicans viewed him as a valuable asset to their party and an essential tool in the “fight” against the Johnson. Stanton opened showed his opposition to Johnson and that was when Johnson decided that Stanton couldn’t stay in the senate anymore so he violated the Tenure of Office Act and fired Stanton. Congress jumped on the opportunity to impeach and charge Johnson. The charges against President Johnson came from the Tenure of Office Act of 1867 which was later declared unconstitutional in 1926. Johnson was not convicted of the charges so he got to finish out his term as president.
Johnson’s impeachment was not fair because was not involved in a huge scandal nor he did not lie to American people he was just not a popular guy. Johnson breaking the Tenure of Office Act is hardly grounds to impeach him, the president should only be impeached under the extreme circumstances of lying or scandal, but it does not send a good message to the American people to impeach a president just because you don’t like him. It sends the message that if you don’t like the president you can just impeach him on spurious charges and the President should have more power than that. If the President had to worry about pleasing people all the time he would make major mistakes. It was a good thing that Johnson didn’t get convicted because that might have started a precedent that if you did not like a president it would be easy to impeach him and convict him and get him out of office.
The Essay on United State President Johnson Clinton
Abuse ofAquittals The Acquittals Abuse of power has never been welcomed by society. Whether it is in the home, on the job, in our schools or in our government, society subjects these abuses of power to investigation and prosecution. The penalties can be a dismissal from their position, court marshal or impeachment for the president. According to Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution, the ...
