Slain Without A Cause Without a doubt, almost all of the attempts to contain and deter the current Iraqi regime have eventually failed. The only policy that has a proven success against Saddam Hussein has been the use of military force. As the worlds only superpower, the United States of America has the capability to remove Saddam Hussein from power. But is a war with Iraq the only option? During the Gulf War, Saddam had missiles fired at Israel with the hope of forcing the other Arab states to support him in what he wanted to become an American/Israeli alliance. Also, Saddam ordered Scuds armed with biological and chemical warheads, to be fired if the U.S.-led coalition invaded Iraq. To make matters worse, Saddams nuclear preparations are so far advanced that a September 2002 report from the International Institute for Strategic Studies concluded that Saddam Hussein could build a nuclear bomb within months if her were able to obtain fissile material (Ritter, 61).
Iraq has a large natural deposit of uranium, but currently posses no methods for enriching enough uranium to complete his nuclear weapons.
But, in the last 14 months, Iraq has sought to purchase thousands of specially designed aluminum tubes which officials believe were intended as components of centrifuges to enrich uranium (Cockburn, 37).
Though the United States had previously supported Iraq against Iran and as part of the Soviet containment policy, the first Bush administration eventually came to realize that Saddam was too much of a threat to their vision of peace and interests in the Middle East. The administration, and every administration thereafter, was divided into two camps comprising of the hawks and doves. The doves preferred a policy of determent or containment, as the believed that Saddam was a rational leader and that there were more important problems in the world. The hawks, on the other hand, believed that the least they could do was to institute a regime change, while the extremists felt the need to a war. The doves were the predominate group in Bushs and Clintons administrations, as well as George W. Bushs administration before September 11.
The Term Paper on United States Saddam Iraq Iraqi
As Afghan opposition groups and U. S. armed forces continue their successes in the war against the Taliban and al Qaeda, the American debate has quickly turned to the question of where the fight against terrorism should go next. In numerous public statements, President Bush has talked about a wide-ranging campaign against global terrorism. He has not committed to military operations against any ...
At first, the policy of containment worked quite well. Iraq was only able to export oil (Iraqs main export) in exchange for food and humanitarian supplies, according to UN Resolution 687. In addition, all transactions would take place with UN-controlled accounts, ensuring that Iraqs revenues were spent on humanitarian supplies (Pollack, 82).
Saddam Hussein, by exaggerating the effects of the sanctions on his people and taking advantage of a schism in the Security Council, was eventually able to remove limitations on the amount of oil Iraq could export. Iraq was also able to win concessions on an extensive list of dual-use goods, goods that have possibly military use as well as civilian use. The only realistic option left would be to use military force to remove Saddam from power.
Iraq has been given a final chance, with a recent UN resolution that requires the re-admittance of the UNMOVIC weapons inspectors and gives them more powers created to combat previous Iraqi attempts at obstructing the inspections (Hiro, 19).
Also, the resolution does not require a formal approval for the use of force by the UN Security Council should Iraq not fully comply, and the Bush administration is more than willing to take advantage of that fact. Any war with Iraq would not be easy, as it would require an enormous amount of money and manpower. Kenneth Pollack, a fifteen-year veteran analyst on Iraq for the CIA and NSC, estimates that success would require a force of close to 300,000 troops and a full commitment to post-war reconstruction (Cockburn, 63).
The Term Paper on Television In Iraq Saddam Hussein
INTRODUCTION The birth of the television was originally introduced here, in the United States. The impact of this new technology was not only evident here in the US, but in other countries as well. In Iraq, television caused immediate changes, which in turn caused adjustments in everyday living. The benefits and negative impacts varied, but overall as in most other countries, television shapes the ...
Though the costs are daunting, Iraqi defiance of the recent UN resolution must be met with force. Previous policies of containment have proven to be useless, with smuggling and even complete disregard for UN sanctions exhibited by countries as large and powerful as Russia and China.
A policy of deterrence is completely unrealistic, as Saddam Hussein is an irrational individual with unrealistic goals. Butler, Richard. 327.1745 Greatest Threat: Iraq, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and the Crisis of Global Security, 2000. pp. 47-56 Cockburn, Andrew and Patrick Cockburn. 956.70443 Out of the Ashes: The Ressurrection of Saddam Hussein, 1999.
pp. 31 – 37, 63, 71 Coughlin, Con. B/Hussein Saddam: King of Terror, 2002. p.89 Hiro, Dilip. 956.7 Iraq: In the Eye of the Storm, 2002. pp.29 – 64 Hiro, Dilip.
956.70443 Neighbors, Not Friends: Iraq and Iran After the Gulf Wars, 2001. pp. 19 – 21 Pollack, Kenneth M. 956.7044 Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq, 2002. pp. 17, 61 – 93.