Slave Versus Master Slavery was a huge part of America’s history and is impossible to ignore today. African-Americans, during the 1860’s, obviously disagreed with the widespread use of slavery and did whatever they could to showcase their disapproval of it. There are many examples of slaves hostility toward their masters, but unfortunately the South was too heavily populated with slave owners for most of the protests to have a huge impact on the push for the abolition of slavery. The population of African-Americans in the South in 1860 is appalling. In 1860 the population was sixty-six percent white, thirty two percent slave, and an unbelievable two percent free blacks in the South. The lucky, few blacks that were free had to think about the abuse and pain their fellow brothers had to go through.
Although some plantation owners were pleasant to work for, it does seem that the majority of slave owners were harsh and brutal to their slaves. (Doc 113) Slaves were considered as a piece of property to every slave owner and most lived a sad, to what they had to do. They protested in several different ways whether it be attacking the slave owner, wounding themselves, or simply ” accidentally” breaking tool needed to perform their everyday duties. (Doc 115) A slave named Nat Turner led one of the most famous revolts. Turner, a slave preacher, led an armed group of African-Americans on a killing spree from house to house in Southampton County, Virginia. They killed sixty white men, women, and children before being overcome by federal troops.
The Essay on Slavery Was A Legal Institution In All Of The 13
Slavery was a legal institution in all of the 13 American colonies. A majority of the founding fathers owned slaves, including the author of the Declaration of Independence, the Father of the Constitution, and the commander of the Continental Army. During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the uneven distribution of the factors of production necessitated a steady stream of servants and ...
Turner’s revolt ended with more than a hundred blacks being executed. This was the most malicious of all the revolts and after Turner’s incident slave conspiracies, were always greatly feared for as long as slavery existed. (Brink 312) Another such revolt was by a slave named Gabriel Prosser, who gathered nearly 1, 000 slaves to brawl with the slave owners. Somehow a couple of slaves gave the plot away, and it was uncovered and stopped by the Virginia militia. The end of the revolt led to the execution of Prosser and others.
(Brink 312) Most slave revolts weren’t anywhere near as extreme as Turner’s or Prosser’s, but there were still many other forms of revolts. It was not unusual for slaves to run away, especially to the North where slavery was illegal, but it was uncommon for the slaves to make it too far or get away. Another major form of resistance was the refusal of their master’s orders. Although, the slaves didn’t directly refuse the orders, they would, however refuse to work hard.
They would do their jobs halfway or lazily. Slaves would also lose or purposely break the tools used to perform the job they were assigned. Breaking or losing the tools would cost the owners extra money and would disable the slaves from doing their job. Other slaves would even go as far as to mutilate themselves so they would be put out of commission and unable to work. (Brink 312-313) The revolts led by the slaves in the long run could seem successful, however the protests do not seem to have had much of an effect.
In the long run these acts might have influenced the North to push harder for abolition, but they didn’t have much effect on the South. Some revolts had an impact, such as Frederick Douglas ‘s protest. Douglas was being beaten by his master, but one day stood up and fought the master. After standing up to him Douglas never got messed with again.
But usually, these revolts led to the South being more and more upset with the slaves. This might have made the slave owners become harder on their slaves. The South acted as if they always would be a slave state and nothing anyone did could change it. The North couldn’t convince the South to abolish slavery except by war, so a few slave revolts definitely wouldn’t change their mind. (Doc 116-118) The uprising of the slaves against their slave owners wasn’t as successful as it could have been. The South was just too stubborn and it would take a lot (like a civil war) before changes would actually take place.
The Essay on Comp Cont Slave Revolt
... he built a religious following that justified a slave revolt. On August 13, 1831, Turner says he saw a halo around the sun. ... America and boosted the population of slaves in the South. The increased number of slaves in the South actually helped heighten the problem ... their voice heard as Nat Turner turned against his owners and made a stand against slavery. Finally, the hard work of the abolitionist ...
Most revolts were unsuccessful because there was a lot of protection against such things as runaways and a federal militia to guard against a large rebellion. There were simply too many things going against the slaves for a revolt or rebellion to really be a success. Slaves had a hard existence and when the stress became too much they would revolt against the slave owners. Unfortunately these revolts didn’t seem to have a very big effect on the Southern slave owners.
The odds were stacked too heavily against the slaves, but the slaves would do anything possible to get out of their dire existence.
