The fight for Scotland’s independents began as early as 1707. The devolution campaign in 1999 helped Scotland become more independent due to the powers that they were able to control, such as education and their ability to create laws that don’t affect the UK. However, devolution has left Scotland wanting more control and has got them pleading for independence. Their plea for independence has had more support then ever before and this has lead to a referendum on the 18th September 2014.
The debate to whether it would be more beneficial for Scotland to stay with the UK then leaving it is very big at this moment in time. One of the main reasons for why Scotland wants to be independent is that they feel that they do not get a say in who runs their country. This was proved in the 2011 election when the conservatives won. The majority of Scotland supports labour and Scotland only has one MP that sits in the conservative party, this shows that it is very unlikely that their country will be run how they want unless the rest of the UK vote for the same party and so independence would be the best solution.
However, if Scotland decides to leave the UK they will lose many benefits that the UK brings to them. Some of the things Scotland benefit from is the network of defences that are put in places to defend us from attacks and the job opportunities that the rest of the UK has. By becoming independent from the UK, Scotland will have to find many solutions to the many problems that will arise, so becoming independent may not be the best solution overall. I think that Scotland need to be realistic about becoming independent and need to think about the consequences.
The Term Paper on United States Declaration of Independence 3
When asked to symbolize the United States of America with one, solitary document, one might immediately think of the Declaration of Independence. This powerful and sacred document not only represents America, but is also one of main reasons this great country exists. America has prided itself on being the “land of the free;” a place for people to have “unalienable rights,” in which they can pursue ...
If they become independent it’s not going to be the best situation for them as they will need to think about security and the risk of people becoming employed as well as other things. This means that the economic damage might begin as soon as it’s started so it may not be the best idea to take the risk. There are also many economic problems with them becoming independent as well. Scotland is the biggest wave and wind power producers in Europe and has 25% of the oil in Europe. The oil alone would earn the country 71 billion.
These resources would make Scotland economically better and if they were to become independent they would become the 8th richest country in the world however, the oil will run out eventually so they cannot just rely on these resources also Scotland say they have oil to support them but the sea is Britain’s property and not just Scotland’s property and therefore if Scotland was to become independent they wouldn’t have anything (according to debate. org).
At present times, Scotland is taking out more money from Westminster then they are putting in.
This means they wouldn’t be able to support themselves as an independent country. Also, Britain has huge debts that they owe to other countries and Scotland are partially responsible from some of the cost so for Scotland to depart from the United Kingdom would be unfair. If Scotland was to become independent there would be a lot of confusion for the Scottish citizens as the country would have to change its currency if Britain doesn’t let them keep to the pound(? ) currency, the citizens would also have to get new passports in replace of their British passports.
All these changes would be very time consuming and be very expensive. Another argument is ‘Is there any point of Scotland becoming independent if they are just going to join the EU again as an independent country? ’ If Scotland are wanting to be independent so that they can have more control over the country and its laws, then why do they want to join back into the EU when they are going to be committed and restricted again? Saying this, it means they don’t have to be wary about jeopardising the laws that the UK have in place and they will still be able to trade within the EU.
The Essay on Should scotland be an independent country
... an oil fund, it is unlikely that Scotland would be economically sustainable after separation therefore it should not be an independent country. ... parliament of Great Britain. While a surrender of independence was unpopular in Scotland, more than 300 years later, Scotland has not ... national debt. Coupled with this, public expenditure per head is substantially higher in Scotland than the rest of the ...
Overall, I think that there are many things that Scotland needs to consider as all the points for becoming independent are far more complicated then they are making out. In my opinion, I think they’re simplifying the issues far too much to try and get the public on their side when the public don’t know the full story. Scotland should tell the public the advantages, disadvantages and consequences before the referendum in September 2014 so that they know exactly what they are voting for.