The 1820 Missouri Compromise Slavery and the Civil War By Stephen Waters Research Task- Describe the role of the 1820 Missouri Compromise in the campaign against slavery! The 1820 Missouri Compromise played a large role in the campaign against slavery. In 1819 Missouri became a statehood and congress considered framing a state constitution, with this a representative attempted to add a anti-slavery legislation with it. This is what started the process of the campaign against slavery. Henry Clay made a large contribution toward this compromise in 1820, with his new ideas on how to settle the conflict between the North and the South, which lasted until 1954.
All the compromise’s made from 1820’s to the Kansas Nebraska compromise in 1854, were all factors which led to the civil war. The state constitution in 1819, was what began of this compromise when James Tallmadge, a representative from New York attempted to add a anti- slavery amendment to the legislation. This gave a ugly and conflicted debate over slavery and the governments rights to restrict slavery. This Tallmadge amendment restricted all further introduction of slaves into Missouri and provided setting free once they reached the age of 25. This legislation was not passed, as the House of Representatives which was controlled by the North passed the idea, but it failed in the Senate which was equally divided between the North and the South. Although the legislation didn’t pass it led to Henry Clay taking it on when Maine became a free state.
The Essay on Ending Slavery In The U.S.-
Ending Slavery in the U.S.- Prior to and during the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860, slavery was a major issue in the United States. From 1830-1850 (also known as the Era of Reform) cotton became the center of America's economy. The more cotton that was grown, the more slave labor was needed to pick it. This drew a lot of attention to slaves and their human rights. Many anti-slavery societies ...
When Maine became a free state, the plan was largely that of Henry Clay who became known as the ‘Great Compromiser.’ Before there was a Compromise, there was a lot of controversy as there was always a equal amount of free states and slaves states since 1789, if Maine was to become a free state (which was highly unavoidable as slaves started to migrate into Missouri and the West of Mississippi), there became a unbalance. This issue was resolved through a two-part compromise, the northern part of Massachuset became known as Maine and was made a free state, at the same time Missouri was a slave state which would once again maintain a balance of 12 slave and 12 free states. In addition to this, a line was drawn at 36 degrees 30 minutes North latitude, and any sections of Louisiana territory lying North of the compromise would be free. This act also provided that if any escaped slave, go into state or territory of the United States, can be legally reclaimed to the person who the slave is owned by.
Due to the compromise in the 1820, stimulation of freeing of slaves in the North was strengthened, along with the laws of slave rights in the south. It revealed to the North, that slavery was rapidly falling out, and the economic consequences could be a major problem as cotton gin was such a successful profit with the use of slaves in the south. In 1832, the New England Anti-Slavery society was formed. Men in the North joined with the South in the effort to keep the subject of slavery out of National Politics, the reason for this is the extreme debate of 1820 Missouri compromise, and the angry defiance of the Tallmadge’s. As the abolition of slavery of the National District of Columbia had been sent by people supporting anti-slavery, they had been referred, as it was only a small committee and it was thought that little conflict would occur. However, with opening of the sessions in 1835, some of the Northern Members began to debate the question.
Slade of Vermont, who was serving his sixth congressional term, wanted a abolitionist petition be printed. The Southerners reaction to this was expressed through a violent protest, they also called on congress to stop interfering with slavery in the certain districts. Slade took up the challenge to speak with these protestors through a speech, which revived the un pleasantries of the 1820 Missouri Compromise. By 1854 the Missouri Organization was overdue along with other states.
The Essay on Free State Slavery States South
... as a slave state even though the North disapproved. Congress soon passed the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This Compromise regulated the extension of slavery in the ... and antislavery settlers. The results reflected great hostility between the slave and free states. In 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed. It ...
As the falling out of slaves was becoming very common in certain territories which further complicated this issue, along with the location of the projected Transcontinental Railroad. This Missouri Compromise was the third debate on slavery in that certain area since 1789. The Kansas Nebraska, in 1854, was very contradicted to the 1820 resolution to slavery, although the new compromise became known as one of the major elements that led to the Civil war. This Compromise was created by Stephen A. Douglas who was a chairman of the Senate committee on territories. After three months of debate in congress, Douglas, who was supported by President Pierce and the southerners, saw it adopted.
This bill that was reported in Jan, 1852 stated that slavery should be left to the territorial settlers themselves, in its final bill provided the creation of two new territories Kansas and Nebraska- instead of the one. The First state would be for slavery, second would be a free state. The result was it created more of a sectional division, it also created a new Political Organization, this is what propelled to the civil war. Ever since the beginning of Slavery in the United States, it has been a hostile issue, however, never before had there been such divided aggression between territories and states after the 1954 Kansas-Nebraska compromise, it was so threatening as it was in the Missouri crisis.
The compromise was thought to settle the slavery falling-out issue, and the sectional conflict didn’t grow until Missouri compromise was repealed by Dred Scott. Dred Scott was a former slave who had been bought into the United States in 1833, he then was moved to a territory Nth of lat 36 degrees 30 minutes where slavery had been forbidden. Scott then, with the help of anti-slavery lawyers, sued for freedom on the grounds of having twice been a resident on Free soil. The lower court and the Missouri Supreme Court ruled against him; and the case went to the US Supreme Court. The Chief Justice Rodger Taney declared that the Missouri Compromise, was unconstitutional and the congress didn’t have the power.
The Essay on Missouri Compromise Slavery North State
... maintain slavery in its border and the population warranted statehood. By the compromise of 1787 Missouri would have become a free state because ... The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 outlawed slavery of the current territory of the United States, but after the purchase of the ... of our country. 1 The Missouri Compromise would be an effort to once again silence this issue. The articulate speeches of the ...
The issue of slavery, once again, made war sound as if it couldn’t be avoided. The 1820 Missouri Compromise was known as highly dangerous and conflicting as it was trying to keep an equal balance of Free and slave-holding states between the North and the South, although the compromise did play a vital role in withholding the peace between the North and the South until the new compromise in 1854 came about. The Missouri compromise was said that it with held the Civil War for over three decades and it played a vital role in the start of the abolition of slavery in America. Bibliography -Word Count- 1112 Internet Sites Used- web – Sat 12 February, Time 12: 42-1: 09 pm web 12 February, Time 12: 12-12: 56 pm. Books Used.
