Have you paused lately to give thanks to the Recording Industry Association of America? We certainly have not. Extensive research has been undertaken to reveal how truly evil the RIAA is. e. vil (v l) That which causes harm, deceit, or destruction The RIAA, we have resolved, has significantly shown instances of each of these tiers of evil. In early September, The RIAA began to initiate a seemingly unending sequence of lawsuits to hold online music sharers accountable for the file-sharing which according to MPAA president Jack Valente is no different than “those who slip a CD under their shirt at a local Tower records.” The accused were issued informational subpoenas obtained from users’ Internet Service Providers. The cornerstone reasoning is said to be that musicians are losing money due to the increasing trend in file-sharing.
First of all, Artists hardly profit from their CD sales in the first place. The RIAA owns exclusive rights to most of their musicians’ music. One of the only bands to speak out against file sharing, Metallica, coincidentally is one of the few bands successful enough to own their own music. Almost all artists have little or no say in what happens to their music.
Thanks to an RIAA lobbied adaption to copyright laws, the old copyright restriction of seven years plus a seven year extension has been pushed to the author’s life plus seventy-five years. Furthermore none of the money obtained in the currently ensuing lawsuits is arranged to go to the musicians whom the RIAA claims to defend. This proves that lawsuits against file-sharers are not for the benefit of musicians. Not only does the RIAA have ridiculous reasoning behind their lawsuits, the lawsuits themselves are carried out in an unconstitutional manner.
The Essay on Online Music Sharing Napster One Aimster
Online Music Sharing Will cds and cassettes soon become extinct like the 8 track and vinyl records? Well, that very well may become the case due to online music sharing. Music sharing has become the hottest, most popular thing now-a-days for teens and college students across the nation. This innovative idea is now caught in between a war of advocates and anti-advocates, courts have now become ...
The informational subpoenas issued by the RIAA are obtained in the following manner: The RIAA finds a user who is suspected of infringement, the RIAA then pressures the user’s ISP to violate that user’s privacy (an issue being addressed in the supreme court) and grant any and all personal information to the RIAA. The RIAA then has power to take that person to court without the approval a judge. Respected senator Norm Coleman, chairman of the US senate’s permanent subcommittee on investigations, summarized the problems of this in a letter to RIAA president Cary-Sue Sherman. “Surely it was not Congress’ intent when it passed the Digital Millenium Copyright Act to short-circuit due process protections, relegate a U. S. District Court to providing ‘rubber stamp’s subpoenas, enable the music industry to collect information about consumers with little or no restrictions, and place numerous average consumers at risk of bankruptcy.” So basically the RIAA is going about using shady methods (deceit) to obtain excessive financial gratification from people who are not truly stealing.
(harm) These financial gratifications will not go towards the growth and expansion of the music industry. The entire process, rather, will turn people against the music industry altogether First sentence a parody of an article beginning, “Have you paused lately to give thanks to the RIAA? I have… .” written by Bret A. Fau sett. And found at: web Dictionary definition found at web.
