Why do you believe that John Brown believed that the situation in the U. S. at the time could only be solved by bloodshed and not compromise? I believe that there are many reasons why John Brown believed that violence was the only way he could prevail in the fight to end slavery in the United States. First of all; at this time in history, issues were moving fairly quickly.
As soon as Kansas was to become a territory, supporters from both the North and South rushed to settle on the land and tried to gain control of the vote in the area. Secondly, it probably seemed that any attempts at compromise at that time had not, and would not, get very far in the issue. Lastly, the most prominent reason I believe that John Brown felt violence was the only answer, was because of his belief in God. As he stated in his speech to the courts during his trial, he felt that what he did was not wrong.
Sacrificing his life was worth it; even if it was just one step towards ending slavery, something that was so cruel and wicked anyway, his violence was no worse than the slavery. When the Kansas-Nebraska Act was introduced in the U. S. , the North was upset because the new territories would probably be pro-slavery. As soon as they could, both sides of the issue sent in settlers to try and gain control.
This “race for Kansas” made the race to make a final decision on the issue of slavery in the U. S. an even more urgent issue. This battle to decide what side the two new territories would be on probably pushed the issue so hard it caused a lot of discomfort and probably hurried people like John Brown into making decisions quickly, because people were afraid.
The Essay on John Brown 2
John Brown John Brown was an abolitionist and insurrectionist. He and several others seized the United States Armory and Arsenal at Harper s Ferry. Brown was really into the slave thing, he hated it. One night he and three son s killed three men who were for slavery. During the raid, many of Brown s men were killed. Brown was forced to stay over night at the Armory. When local militia noticed ...
I believe that the rush to make a ruling for or against slavery was one reason why John Brown chose bloodshed over compromise. The second reason I believe Brown picked violence over negotiation was because of the lack of communication. It probably seemed a hopeless endeavor to even try to correspond with the South on the issue, especially after violence had already begun in many places; not to mention in the act of slavery itself. It would have been very hard for either side to civilly speak or negotiate with the opposition in an reasonable manner.
Conflict had already gotten too deep by the time John Brown decided to take a stand. Obviously to me, Brown’s belief in God was the chief reason why he chose bloodshed over concession. In his own speech to the courts during his trial after the fight at Harper’s Ferry, he himself stated, “I believe that to have interfered as I have done… in behalf of His despised poor, was not wrong, but right. Now, if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life for the furtherance of the ends of justice, and mingle my blood further with the blood of my children and with the blood of millions in this slave country whose rights are disregarded by wicked, cruel, and unjust enactments-I submit; so let it be done!” To me, what he said meant that to him, God was on his side, and sacrificing his life or having others sacrifice their lives, even his family, was worth it if it was even one small step towards ending slavery, something that was so cruel and wicked anyway, the violent measures he was taking were no worse than the slavery itself. To him, slavery was morally evil, plain and simple, and he would do anything it took to end it as soon as possible.
In my own mind, I see there to be many reasons why a man like John Brown chose hostility over negotiation. Being rushed to make a decision, especially after fighting had already taken place, definitely would have made things more confusing, and the urge to find an answer may have pushed him to the edge. Also, in those times, communication was poor, and after so many years of combating over the issue anyway, compromise probably seemed impossible and futile. Brown’s belief in God; though, to me, is the most apparent reason why he felt that bloodshed was the only answer. He himself stated that he felt God was behind him, and to him the moral decrepitude of slavery was worth anything, even his own life.
The Essay on Arthur Miller John God Life
It was with ardent horror that the prehistoric man first witnessed a solar eclipse -- -the sun swallowed by the predator moon until all light ceased and darkness fell on to the land. We, the more enlightened descendants, have also suffered eclipses. One such eclipse was the darkness of evil that fell upon Salem in 1692, when many men and women were accused of compacting with the Devil. These ...
If nothing else, John Brown probably felt a lot of anger and resentment towards the South, and was prepared to do anything to fight for his belief in the need for the termination of slavery in his country.
