No matter how big or small the subjects are they wll still be counted for to the hundredths. Why is it important NOT to tell subjects what is being determined before they clasp their hands? Answer: It is important not to tell the subjects what is being determined before they clasp their hands is because if you do tell them, it will ruin the whole concept. It won’t turn out correctly nor will your experiment turn out right or be hundred percent true. That’s why its called an experiment to see the different conclusions people will come up with.
Combine the percentages for same hand/thumb (right handed/right thumb dominant + left hand/left thumb dominant) and opposite hand/thumb (right handed/left thumb dominant + left hand/right thumb dominant) in another table like Table 1-3. Answer: Write a paragraph that verbally presents the data summarized in Tables 1-2 and 1-3. Answer: Well in this experiment, it has proven that if you are Right-Handed you are most likely to be Right-thumb dominant. In the experiment that I did it definitely pointed in that direction. Same with Left-Handed with Left-Thumb dominance.
Answer: The hypothesis was that there if you are right-Handed then you are most likely to be right-Handed dominance. And if you are left-Handed you are most likely to be Left-Handed dominance. When I did this experiment it definitely pointed towards that. So all the data supports the conclusion and hypothesis. Why should the data for same handedness-thumb and different handedness-thumb be combined for purposes of analysis? Answer: They should be combined to make the experiment more adequate. It makes the experiment more believable. It basically gives this whole experiment a conclusion to the whole thing.
The Basics of Boxing Boxing is a very fun sport to learn. The skills you learn in boxing can help you in many ways. You can box at many different levels. Some people do it for exercise and others do it for a living. Boxing is basically a very easy spot to learn. In order to learn the basics of boxing it is necessary to discus the basic stance, the basic defensive moves, and the basic offensive ...
Recheck all steps, evaluate the total experiment, and draw implications from the conclusions. Is the experiment valid enough to reach a conclusion? Answer: After rechecking all of my work, this experiment is valid enough to draw a conclusion. From the data I got it seemed like very few were different dominance. Example if they were right-Handed then they were most likely to be right thumb dominant. And so forth with the Left-Handed people. So the conclusion would be that the subjects are most likely to be the same dominant has what they are handedness.
How can the conclusion be supported by using statistics? Answer: The conclusion can be supported by using statistics by looking up all the information needed for this. It helps to look up other theories on this experiment. Are the results meaningful? Answer: Any experiment with results are meaningful because it tells you a lot about the whole experiment. It provides information and it tests your hypothesis at the same time. It’s very important in one way or another. Were enough subjects used to be conclusive? Answer: Enough Subjects were being used.
It’s not a 100 percent correct but it gives us an idea of what the hypothesis and experiment will turn out to be. You could have interviewed 40 subjects to 7 subjects. It wouldn’t have mattered anyways. What experimental conditions are responsible for the results that were obtained? Answer: Some of the experimental conditions were that the 50 subjects I got, it showed the different information we needed to obtain for this laboratory. The subjects did receive all sorts of stuff. Some of the conditions were that the hypothesis would turn out wrong depending on how many I did.
What follow-up experimentation might be of use, based on this experiment? Answer: One follow-up experimentation might be our inheritance. Basically our genes and all that information. Going into detail of why Left-Handed and Right-Handed people have differences and similarities. We could go into critical thinking and really think about what other experiments we might go into to. If the obtained data results do not agree with those that are provided in the example above, which set would you believe? Why? Answer: Either one because overall this is just an experiment, nothings been hundred percent correct.
In this project I will be testing whether or not popcorn yields a higher percentage of popped kernels when frozen. This is relevant because most people would like to get the best value out of items they purchased and this may demonstrate one way to do that. I will be freezing multiple bags of popcorn and then popping both frozen and unfrozen bags in the microwave. Finally I will count the popped ...
This is just a hypothesis I am working on, nothing has been determined quite yet to be true. Exercise 1-2: Writing a Laboratory Report Results: Your laboratory report will be the result for this exercise. Discussion: Propose a hypothesis for a hypothetical experiment and outline the experiment that would be conducted to test it. Use the steps of the scientific method to organize the outline. Answer: First of I would think about my data results and then go from there. I would start drawing conclusions on why I think the experiment turned out that way.
A hypothesis is a lot to take in. My hypothesis would be that the number of Right-Handed people were most likely to be Right handed dominant. And that Left-handed people were left-handed dominant. Read a scientific research paper in a scientific journal. Identify the parts of the paper that address aspects of the scientific method. Find the parts that would be considered the abstract, background information, the hypothesis, the procedure, the data, and the conclusion. Did the experiment include a control? Why or why not? Is a control always necessary?
Answer: The abstract part of this experiment would be testing the subjects and not letting me know all of their information. The background information would be the questioning of the subjects to participate in this experiment. The hypothesis is when we got all the data and then drew a conclusion from it to see if we can form the right hypothesis. The data is all 50 subjects and the percentages of what we counted. And finally the conclusion is when we see if any of the background information and the data turned out correctly or made any sense for us to even make a conclusion from it.
As the complexity of systems-on-a-chip continues to increase, the difficulty and cost of testing such chips is increasing rapidly. One of the challenges in testing SOC is dealing with the large size of test data that must be stored in the tester and transferred between the tester and the chip. The cost of automatic test equipment (ATE) increases significantly with the increase in their speed, ...
This experiment did include a control group because we weren’t experimenting on any subjects, I was using the subjects as in example. The control isn’t always necessary because it all depends on the experiment itself. Verify what you have learned by answering the following questions: What are the essential elements of the scientific method? Answer: The essential elements of the scientific method would be all of the following: Observation, the collection of data, being able to share the data, the hypothesis, the experiment alone and the analysis of the data.
What is a hypothesis? Can more than one H1 be tested? Can there be an H2? Answer: A hypothesis is an explanation of limited evidence for an experiment or project. There can be more than one hypothesis if only you have more data to back it up. There can be H^2. Can a hypothesis be proven? Why or why not? Answer: Yes, a hypothesis can be proven by researching the answer or other information that was given for this experiment. It can be proven in many ways. Is it sufficient to do a single experiment to test a hypothesis? Why or why not?
Answer: It can be sufficient to do a single experiment to test a hypothesis because one is enough but if you can get more then one then the hypothesis is more likely to be proven right. What statistical techniques can be used to add robustness to the data results? Answer: There can be more data and more subjects to it. There can be more information like getting the background information in more detail. You would need to do lots of critical thinking for this. Why is it easier to test only one substance at a time or only one action at a time when doing an experiment?
Answer: It’s very important to test only one substance at a time because the results will come out more accurately. It makes more sense that way. Also because if you do more then one subject at a time, your whole experiment won’t turn out correctly. Is it possible to test more than one outcome at a time? What revisions in the testing approach would need to be made to do this? Answer: It all depends on the experiment. In some cases it wouldn’t matter if someone tested more than one outcome at a time but since this one had 50 subjects it was best not to.
You would need a whole lot of other information, like the genes in the 50 subjects and their DNA. What is the purpose of a control in an experiment? Does every experiment require a control? Answer: The purpose of a control in an experiment is basically processing all the information at once. It will include everything you would need for an experiment. It includes the data, the experiment itself and the observation. Not every experiment requires this but it’s so important to have one though. Do the following statements represent a hypothesis, conclusion or theory? )The data show that various vaccines protect people from disease. Answer: I would say conclusion only because they tested this before and now are making a conclusion to the problem. 2)All living things are made of cells. Answer: This represents a theory because this statement is true. 3)e=mc2 Answer: I want to say a theory or a conclusion…. (Could be wrong) 4)The instructor loves chocolate chip cookies! (Okay, just checking that you’re still awake, but you could test this! It would definitely require multiple tests! ) What applications might the Scientific Method have to daily life? Give an example.
A Test of Time: The Bible - from Myth to History by David M. Rohl Century Ltd., London, 1995 426 pp., 51 color and 424 b/w photos and graphic illustrations sterling17.99 hardcover (available at this time only in the U.K.) ISBN 0-7126-5913-7 Where to start in discussing this piece of work ? David M. Rohl s A Test of Time is quite unlike any other history book that I ve ever read from forward to ...
Answer: An example would be Hypothesis 1: “My jacket is in the car” Test: You look for jacket in the car, not there Hypothesis 2: “Since the Jacket isn’t in car, it’s in the laundry room” Test 2: Look in laundry room, jacket is not there. Hypothesis 3: “I left my jacket in my closet” Test 3: Look there and I found it. A hypothesis is basically stating something and testing to see if its right or not. A hypothesis is based on information that is given and data that is given then being tested how many times to see the results. Laboratory Summary: What have you learned from doing this laboratory? Answer:
I have learned so many thing such as experiments can teach you so much about something. For example this experiment has taught me that if you are right-handed then your most likely to be right-handed dominant and so forth if you are left-handed. Laboratories always teach you something. I enjoyed this experiment very much and although I struggled at times, I still think I did an alright job and had fun with it. It also teaches you things about what exactly is an hypothesis, how to analysis your data and getting all of your background information.