Japan occupied by US forces B. New Divisions and the End of Empires i. Decolonization led to independence for Malaya, Indonesia, Philippines ii. Taiwan ruled by Chiang Kai Shek, mainland to Mao a. Taiwan emergs as separate republic iii. US intervention preserves South Korean independence C. Japanese Recovery i. Recovered economy in surprising speed a. US provided opportunity for selective westernization ii. New political system a. Ruled by General Douglas MacArthur b. Got rid of wartime political structure i. military disbanded ii. police decentralized iii. officials removed iv. political prisoners released c.
Democratization i. women suffrage ii. encouraging labor unions iii. abolishing Shintoism as state religion d. People in favor of demilitarization e. Parliament system easy to incorporate – already have history iii. New economic pattern a. Broke up landed estates b. Tried, but failed to break up zaibatsus iv. Other changes a. Military abolished forever – unique for industrialized nation b. Emperor becomes symbolic figurehead only c. 1963 law for taking care of elderly v. Japanese society a. Education – reduced nationalism in textbooks i. Back to state control after occupation ii. Have to teach tradition to children b.
The Essay on Political Leadership
... by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association Stable URL: http://www. jstor. org/stable/2127069 Accessed: 04/08/2008 ... information about JSTOR, please contact org. http://www. jstor. org POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND THE PROBLEM OF THE CHARISMATIC POWER* ... GeselIschaft, 1922, Part I, Chap. 3, paras. 1014; Part III, Chap. 9, and elsewhere. An abbreviated edition of ...
Extreme meritocracy – rigid examination system D. Korea: Intervention and War i. Gave Russia control of north in exchange for potential help against Japan ii. North Korea – People’s Democratic Republic of Korea a. Communist totalitarian state – Kim Il-Sung until 1994 iii. South Korea – Republic of Korea a. Parliamentary institutions but authoritarian iv. Korean War a. 1950-1953 – N. Korea invades, S. Korea + United Nations pushes back b. China gets invovlved, pushes back to original borders c. Sign armistice v.
Two divergent paths since then a. N. Korea – isolated one-man rule i. Power to one political party + military . S. Korea – w/ help from US economic + military bases vi. Tensions continued between two nations with border clashes E. Emerging Stability in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore i. Nationalists take over Taiwan island after losing civil war a. Communists couldn’t threaten Taiwan – no navy a. Becomes authoritarian – must keep island under control c. Support of US – convinced Chiang to not attack mainland ii. Hong Kong – returned to China from British control in 1997 a. Chinese population swelled – economy boomed iii. Singapore a. British naval base until 1971 b. Became strong port and independent nation iv.
Second priority – improving their personal opportunities c. French stopped attempts at peaceful resistance i. Violent resistance only option – Vietnamese nationalist party a. French respond w/ imprisonment, repression, execution ii. Communist party of Vietnam – lone nationalist party a. Led by Ho Chi Minh – ignored at WWI Paris Peace Conference b. Tried to foment revolution – but hard w/ only peasants c. Forced underground, but gained support from Comintern C. The War of Liberation Against the French a. Viet Minh take over i. Help push out Japanese in WWII ii. Encouraged land reform and mass education iii.
The Essay on World War 1 European Nation
The number of casualties was 37, 508, 686 (Gilbert 4). The cost was over $125, 690, 477, 000. 00 (Gilbert 4). The very first line of Sidney Bradshaw Fay Thesis states, "None of the Powers wanted a European War." Why was so much money spent and why were so many lives sacrificed for a war that no nation anticipated or wanted? Who would start a war like this? Some people say Germany is to blame for ...